Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have just had issues with this importer myself!!

My thread

Hopefully this guy starts losing business!!

sorry to hear u having same drama as me with this dodgy seller, i have lodged a formal complaint with Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal and thereafter will take it to small claims tribunal if need be, if a satisfactory outcome is not achieved, i will at least ensure he loses x10 amount he ripped me off for by trying to make a quick buck.. keep up the pm n shame so at least others sau users arent a victim

Edited by BWRGTR
  • 5 months later...

small claims? lol just call your bank and lodge a dispute under Items not received as ordered.

if the bank says nah we cant give you your money threaten with "FOS" Financial Banking Ombudsman.

anything under $500.00 the Bank should get the Money Back.

...

Oh I forgot to mention I work for FOS.

its the quickest way to get your money back.

ohhhh my bad for bringin up a dead thread.

  • 1 month later...

small claims? lol just call your bank and lodge a dispute under Items not received as ordered.

if the bank says nah we cant give you your money threaten with "FOS" Financial Banking Ombudsman.

anything under $500.00 the Bank should get the Money Back.

...

Oh I forgot to mention I work for FOS.

its the quickest way to get your money back.

ohhhh my bad for bringin up a dead thread.

Might be an Old thread, but thats a GREAT bit of advice man!

  • 2 weeks later...

This guy offering you $50 to call it even is about as close as you'll get to an admission of guilt from him I think. He's basically trying to bribe you with $50 so that you'll forget about the $420 he ripped you off. Did he think this one through properly before making such a ridiculous offer? How could he on any reasonable grounds be only $50 responsible for something which cost over $400 all told? If he honestly didn't think he did anything wrong he wouldn't (and shouldn't) have offered you a token $50 refund. This guy knows he's done something wrong and is trying to cheap his way out.

This guy offering you $50 to call it even is about as close as you'll get to an admission of guilt from him I think. He's basically trying to bribe you with $50 so that you'll forget about the $420 he ripped you off. Did he think this one through properly before making such a ridiculous offer? How could he on any reasonable grounds be only $50 responsible for something which cost over $400 all told? If he honestly didn't think he did anything wrong he wouldn't (and shouldn't) have offered you a token $50 refund. This guy knows he's done something wrong and is trying to cheap his way out.

if this is the case dont accept that offer from the merchant. it give the bank and the financial ombudsman service no right to pursue the matter as it was technically handled directly with the merchant in agreement of settlement.

may help in a situation like that

if this is the case dont accept that offer from the merchant. it give the bank and the financial ombudsman service no right to pursue the matter as it was technically handled directly with the merchant in agreement of settlement.

may help in a situation like that

is that for all states FOS ?

small claims? lol just call your bank and lodge a dispute under Items not received as ordered.

if the bank says nah we cant give you your money threaten with "FOS" Financial Banking Ombudsman.

anything under $500.00 the Bank should get the Money Back.

...

Oh I forgot to mention I work for FOS.

its the quickest way to get your money back.

ohhhh my bad for bringin up a dead thread.

is there a timeframe for the claim to be made? the small claims i lodged was with victoria office as the trader is vic based only to be told later, i will have more luck lodging in nsw (where i was living).. i didnt bother as it looked like i would be going around in a circle

This guy offering you $50 to call it even is about as close as you'll get to an admission of guilt from him I think. He's basically trying to bribe you with $50 so that you'll forget about the $420 he ripped you off. Did he think this one through properly before making such a ridiculous offer? How could he on any reasonable grounds be only $50 responsible for something which cost over $400 all told? If he honestly didn't think he did anything wrong he wouldn't (and shouldn't) have offered you a token $50 refund. This guy knows he's done something wrong and is trying to cheap his way out.

yeah, he even offered to give me a good price if i bought more stuff from him in the future, what sort of idiot will do that? as it stands, i still have the panel sitting somewhere as it looked shit when fitted.. he is a trader on sau so i posted on all his thread to warn others who may look at dealing with him and pm'd other members who posted in the thread.. its gonna cost him more than what he ripped me off for in lost business and ill make sure of that.. if it was an individual who ripped me off and not a business, i would chaulk it down to bad call, however i was dealing with a business (even a trader on here) and it had a business policy covering refund/returns, which at the end of the day was worth jack shit

if this is the case dont accept that offer from the merchant. it give the bank and the financial ombudsman service no right to pursue the matter as it was technically handled directly with the merchant in agreement of settlement.

may help in a situation like that

nope did not accept the $50 offer, pretty much told him to shove it up his ass

  • 2 weeks later...

is there a timeframe for the claim to be made? the small claims i lodged was with victoria office as the trader is vic based only to be told later, i will have more luck lodging in nsw (where i was living).. i didnt bother as it looked like i would be going around in a circle

nope did not accept the $50 offer, pretty much told him to shove it up his ass

not really a time frame. with internal bank disputes you have 60 days to make the claim. any disputes lodged after that will be declined. we have people making complaints through FOS for situations that have happened years ago, but keep in mind, those situations are generally large ones..

yeh good. mate PM Me i'll try and give you some help..

Im interested to hear how this is worked out. Cant stand dodgey bastards deliberatly ripping off people and getting away with it. Especially when they are a trader on our site

chances are if the bank resolves it, the "dodgey bastard" will still get away with it.. funds will just be reimbursed by the bank itself. it sucks i know but at least the OP is no longer out of pocket

  • 1 month later...

this has given me something to think about, i know that dodgy things can happen on eBay, but the way this has been worded, has given me a reminder of when i bought some items off a guy, i went away and asked the misses to keep the payments going each time, she forgot to do so, and as such came back to a some what angry message from the guy, but as the money had not been payed and just sat in the bank, i was able to do the remainder of the payment to him to which he was happy, but i could clearly see that to him i was doing the dodgy to him in a way.

  • 2 weeks later...

Mate, shoot me the business name of this cretin so I can be certain I won't do any business with him, and can advise mates likewise. He owes a replacement or refund. No question. You can also lodge a complaint with fair trading in Vic, and possibly even NSW. If he runs a business he has to follow the law. This would probably even fall under the trade Practices Act for misleading a customer if he has lied at all, like saying you aren't entitled to a refund or replacement, and possibly even shown a pic of the item in good nick and then sending on as damaged.

Keep on his back, and claim any extra costs as well if it comes to it. I've just had a major win over my insurance company in ACT for a rental house I have there. Storm damaged roof - hail 18 months before my current claim and they fixed it and said they would have the entire tile roof checked to ensure it was fine. Then wind storm lifted ridge cap in the current claim and they said it was due to poor maintenance. They then lied that they had a report from the roofer that said the roof was in perfect condition after the hail repair. It was BS of course as my tenant, a contract painter said the only attention they paid was to the hail damaged areas and they left, no detailed checks. I demanded the document and any others relating to that repair under Right to Information (FOI) and advised that I would have the mortar tested at a NATA test facility as the house is only 13 years old, not the 25 they alleged. I had the house built btw. So after screwing around for many months now and failing to produce the report they have folded and asked for the repair invoice to pay me. Of course they said another builder inspected the roof who said it could be due to previous hail damage, not poor maintenance so they have to cover it. I don't care that they have to pretend someone else screwed up, as long as they meet their obligation.

BTW, Tiles are shit roofing material. Colorbond all the way. Stinkin' southern builders have quoted 20K extra to do colorbond on one house I built so they didn't have to do it, yet up here in Gods country tiles cost more. Go figure that out.

Stay on his ass brother.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • You're not the first person that's said that about this car lol. A Touring wagon GT in Spark yellow mica would be the dog's danglies 😆 I will keep an eye out for a future purchase for sure. The seats are almost like the OEM Recaros... electric adjustment for fore/aft and tilt movements except reclining.   
    • Yes!! I love these! It's a shame its not the wagon though!   Thank everything that's holy that it doesn't have the interior of the Aussie delivered ones. Those seats are so much nicer.  
    • I'm both sorry and thankful that you do that. 
    • 2001 BE5D Subaru Legacy B4 RSK (3rd gen) EJ208 (pink injector) Twin Turbo 280PS 5-speed manual Full time 4WD "RSK" grade which means all of the above LQC option which means stock rear spoiler  I got it primarily to export to someone outside Japan who was interested. These BE5 Legacy B4 RSKs are going through a bit of a resurgence right know in Japan as they are one of the few cars from the "turbo, manual, RWD/4WD, 280hp gentleman's agreement era" cars that don't require stupid money to purchase. Which for some people might be a good opportunity to get as a base for restoration. If I can't find anyone to purchase it I will certainly be doing that myself over the long term. Why? Because it's properly fast in stock form, handles well enough for a GT sedan, there's still enough aftermarket and (if you can wait a while) genuine part support to make it a restoration candidate (<-- that will only get worse over time so it's a case of do it now or choose get a BL5 4th Gen). Mechanically it's fine, has only 89,200kms on the odometer. The problem with this car is that the body and exterior trims are weathered from at least the last 10 years being parked outdoors. I'm the 3rd owner, the first owner was the one that had it for 14 years and barely drove it, had a low-speed front impact (which didn't damage anything behind the radiator support) and got it fixed and sold it. The 2nd owner put most of the kms on it and parked it outside for the last 10 years, hence the door rubbers have seen better days but if you overlook those cosmetic details, it presents pretty nicely. There is some minor rust on the LH rear wheel arch which I'll have looked at too at some stage.  Also as you'd expect from a car this age, the clear top coat is gone, leaving a satin finish on the roof.  Mechanically it's fine (as you would expect from a car with less than 100K kms) but the steering does feel slightly vague around the centre position at higher speeds. So first on the list is to get the steering rack bushes looked at. There's also the Lock button on the remote which doesn't work, but the Open button does.... it means that the anti-theft system thinks it's always open? It seems like if you open the car and don't start the engine within 3 mins or so the anti-theft kicks in again without any beeps or signals. So if you got to start it after that, it won't. You have to push the open button again. That's how I understand it anyway. Just a small irritation but not a big problem to sort out. There's only one mod, the Wangan SPL muffler. Just a tad louder than stock. It's a really good mod for those who don't want to wake the neighbours but still want to hear a more prominent unequal length header EJ20 sound. Anyway I hope to get all those things done eventually, that is unless someone wanted to import it to their country from Japan (where I live). I'm open for negotiations as I really would like a Skyline... but this will definitely suffice in the meantime 🙂 *Disclaimer: This is how I picked it up from the dealer, minus the stuff on the back seat. I haven't cleaned the engine bay or done a thorough exterior clean, aside from spray painting the wipers. 
    • Wow, even with the Audi logo centre caps. I love OEM wheel mismatches. 
×
×
  • Create New...