Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It's just not practical for road cars to have a cage, period.

Sprints on cold tyres? What about 30 cars door to door battling for T1 on cold tyres.

I dont buy that argument (that sprints are more dangerous).

edit: btw that video was awesome.

Its not practical for road cars to have roll cage - its not practical for road cars to run slicks! Its not practicle for daily drivers to do sub 1.40's at Eastern Creek as an example

  • Replies 156
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Its not practical for road cars to have roll cage - its not practical for road cars to run slicks! Its not practicle for daily drivers to do sub 1.40's at Eastern Creek as an example

it's not practical to swap tyres out at the track?

ok, whatever.

Its not practical for road cars to have roll cage - its not practical for road cars to run slicks! Its not practicle for daily drivers to do sub 1.40's at Eastern Creek as an example

Look what popped up again! Ok to solve the problem could the R35 GTR stop being driven on the road as daily drivers. You are only allowed to drive them on weekends to race track and put slicks on there to do sub 1:40’s.

Duncan (LSX-438) can you please go buy another every day road car to keep the completion fair for others at sprints and do more mods to the R35 as it must only be your weekend car now.

This crap is going nowhere lets forget about it......

No Mate,,,this is as funny as,,,. While we are playing head games,,,why don't we get the RTA and the EPA to check the road legalness of ALL the cars with rego labels and plates.

Now that would be a barrel of laughs.

Cheers

Neil.

No Mate,,,this is as funny as,,,. While we are playing head games,,,why don't we get the RTA and the EPA to check the road legalness of ALL the cars with rego labels and plates.

Now that would be a barrel of laughs.

Cheers

Neil.

Now that would be hilarious. Dunno how many "registered" cars i've seen turn up, on trailers, gutted, caged, carbon panels with all sorts of race gear. Truth is even a car with a simple tune or exhaust is probably "illegal" in that sense anyway, no car in the paddock would pass.

Can't wait for someone to open that can of worms one day.

No Mate,,,this is as funny as,,,. While we are playing head games,,,why don't we get the RTA and the EPA to check the road legalness of ALL the cars with rego labels and plates.

Now that would be a barrel of laughs.

Cheers

Neil.

indeed....would be the easiest championship my car would ever win.

All of which makes the point that seperate and open rules for "street registered" cars are bullshit. Same with SV for that matter. Just put them in the appropriate 1/2/3/4/5 class that all cars are meant to run in. I don't see how having a log book defines which class you should be in, and more than 50% of cars are in these "special" classes now which makes it all pretty meaningless.

Regardless of anything else going on in this thread, Duncan I am surprised you are happy to be doing the lap times you are without a roll cage.

I didnt say i'm happy. I have looked into a cage, it's just not going to work in a street car.

I can see the safety argument of course, but at the same time sprints are not racing, and NOBODY is racing anywhere under CAMS without a cage.

Why change the rules to exclude the vehicles for which the category was invented for?

To me that's stupid.

A better approach is to just buy a race car, and go racing.

I can see the safety argument of course, but at the same time sprints are not racing, and NOBODY is racing anywhere under CAMS without a cage.

.

I can see what you are saying, but you are still going just as quick, if not doing quicker lap times in the Sprint series than you would door to door.

going 11/10ths in a sprint or a "race" is still going 11/10ths

you can still drop a wheel in the dirt and end up on the roof etc and a quicker car on slicks is going to have a bigger stack than captain slow in his daily drive civic.

So yes there are arguments both for and against requiring a cage in the quicker classes.

And not everyone wants or can afford to go door to door with their race car so they have fun at sprints, which isnt what owning a club racer is all about? fun? Not "you have a cage gtfo of my sprint series" etc.

Its not practical for road cars to have roll cage - its not practical for road cars to run slicks! Its not practicle for daily drivers to do sub 1.40's at Eastern Creek as an example

i dont see why not if you drive maturely.. i ran semi slicks(toyo r1r's) on my last daily(gtir) and it was awesome.. id use them again if they werent so bloody expensive for 18's

No Mate,,,this is as funny as,,,. While we are playing head games,,,why don't we get the RTA and the EPA to check the road legalness of ALL the cars with rego labels and plates.

Now that would be a barrel of laughs.

Cheers

Neil.

Just to keep the stupidness going I have plan Neil, you go buy at shitty Suzuki Swift that is road registered still. Stamp the VIN number on your car somewhere and put the number plates on the Radical take one part of the swift and put it on the Radical and you have a Radical Swift Kit Car and can run in SV with the Clubmans. It’s not your Daily drive so it will be fine........

Someone in Bankstown will give you a pink slip every year for $100 to keep is registered.

I can see what you are saying, but you are still going just as quick, if not doing quicker lap times in the Sprint series than you would door to door.

going 11/10ths in a sprint or a "race" is still going 11/10ths

you can still drop a wheel in the dirt and end up on the roof etc and a quicker car on slicks is going to have a bigger stack than captain slow in his daily drive civic.

So yes there are arguments both for and against requiring a cage in the quicker classes.

And not everyone wants or can afford to go door to door with their race car so they have fun at sprints, which isnt what owning a club racer is all about? fun? Not "you have a cage gtfo of my sprint series" etc.

NOBODY is proposing that race cars (with a cage or whatever) should NOT run in sprints at all. The issue here is some think (certain) road cars should NOT run - in sprints no less. A category invented so people with road cars can have a crack at the track. All i am saying is, if you insist on unadulterated CAMS rules - go and play in a race category.

Yeah I get that, but street cars dont run slicks do they...Which is the the issue a lot of people have.

I dont care if you turn up in a Maserati MC12 GTR, but if you want to run in a road car catagory then you should run road tyres, if you want to play with the race cars on slicks then you should have a cage like a race car.

Not directly having a go at you Dunc, But I like the Vic rules better, where if you want slicks then get a cage.

I guess it's just me but i see an obvious distinction between swapping tyres out at the track (no matter what they are) and fitting a cage. You do realise some road legal semi's out perform SOME slicks don't you? Where do you draw the line? You can't.

But it's not just about the tyres though, there have been issues/unofficial protests about engine capacity, gearboxes (dsg) window nets, wings, race seats, etc etc etc etc etc. And it's all come from a single person this year with a hidden agenda.

I guess it's just me but i see an obvious distinction between swapping tyres out at the track (no matter what they are) and fitting a cage. You do realise some road legal semi's out perform SOME slicks don't you? Where do you draw the line? You can't.

But it's not just about the tyres though, there have been issues/unofficial protests about engine capacity, gearboxes (dsg) window nets, wings, race seats, etc etc etc etc etc. And it's all come from a single person this year with a hidden agenda.

LOL, sounds awesome!

I'm starting the "name and shame!" chant :)

I for one, chose to build a non-registered track only S13 with full roll cage because I enjoy the extra security in the event of a big crash.

As the car was not road registered, I was required to obtain a CAMS log book. (which I happily did)

If I built another car, it would keep the car road registered and install a rear 1/2 bolt in cage only and run in type SV or 3.

As people have said, at the end of the day, it's only a supersprint and we are not racing for sheep stations!

If LSX-438 wants to run at those speeds without a cage, so be it. Fingers crossed nothing bad happens.

I guess it's just me but i see an obvious distinction between swapping tyres out at the track (no matter what they are) and fitting a cage. You do realise some road legal semi's out perform SOME slicks don't you? Where do you draw the line? You can't.

But it's not just about the tyres though, there have been issues/unofficial protests about engine capacity, gearboxes (dsg) window nets, wings, race seats, etc etc etc etc etc. And it's all come from a single person this year with a hidden agenda.

....Keyser Soze

I guess it's just me but i see an obvious distinction between swapping tyres out at the track (no matter what they are) and fitting a cage. You do realise some road legal semi's out perform SOME slicks don't you? Where do you draw the line? You can't.

But it's not just about the tyres though, there have been issues/unofficial protests about engine capacity, gearboxes (dsg) window nets, wings, race seats, etc etc etc etc etc. And it's all come from a single person this year with a hidden agenda.

Hi Duncan

I would draw the line, when tyres say for racing purpose only, if I was scrutineering and you didn't have a cage at supersprint, hillclimb or rally.

Just a question, how come you didn't run slicks or electronic wing at superlap?

Secondly, I don't have a hidden agenda - the d*)khe#d that let you run in 4D (Sports Sedan) in the first place f*!ked the 4D sports sedan class, period.

Note to all - next year NSW supersprint, R35's and similar can run 4E class, this allows, for over 6ltr, traction control, no window nets, no race seats, no roll cage etc etc etc

(but must be road registered)

I like your competiton and watching R35's compete - I had no quarms on championship points or previous years - still don't. I think it is wrong that they were allowed to go in 4D and obtain records, in a totally non complying car - my opinion and the way I read the CAMs manual - and if the NSW supersprint panel continues to make new classes and changes and the owners can't nominate the correct class or get them changed to suit f'it who's gunna bother turning up. (Irace Do You?)

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...