Jump to content
SAU Community

Mishimoto Racing Radiators


Tomei_Powered
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Wondering if anyone is interested in doing a group buy on Mishimoto R33's and R34's racing radiators.

Spoke to one of their distributors and they are willing to give us at $390.00 shipped to anywhere in Australia instead of paying USD360.00 from US which doesnt inc. shipping and tax. I have enquired once. It cost +/- $200 just for shipping alone.

We need 10 ppl to involve in this group buy to get price at $390.00 shipped.

MMRAD-RHD-R32.jpg

MMRAD-RHD-R32_2.jpg

MMRAD-ECL-95T_3.jpg

MMRAD-INT-94_3.jpg

Check them out at www.mishimoto.com

I will open this group buy till 16th December 10'.

If you guys have any questions pls feel free to PM me. If anyone is interested with their intercoolers we can work out another group buy for that.

List of confirm buyers :

1. Tomei_Powered

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys, below are the specs for Mishimoto R33 radiators.

Overall Size: 26.4" x 21.8" x 2.07"

Core Size: 15.75" x 25.51"

Rows: 3

Inlet: 1.4"

Outlet: 1.4"

Core Thickness: 1.57"

Tank Wall Thickness: .08"

Fill Neck: 1.25"

Drain Plug Thread Size: (M16) .06"

Drain Plug Thread Length: .047"

Purchase Includes:

Mishimoto Radiator

Mishimoto Radiator Cap

Magnetic Drain Plug

Limited Lifetime Warranty

Engine Codes:

RB25DET

RB26DETT

Chassis Codes:

R33

Note: Will Fit Turbo Applications Only

Note: This item is for Manual Transmission vehicles. For automatic applications, please purchase optional Mishimoto transmission cooler (P/N: MMTC-U)

Edited by Tomei_Powered
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mishimoto R34 radiator specs :

Overall Size: 26.4" x 21.8" x 2.07"

Core Size: 15.75" x 25.51"

Rows: 3

Inlet: 1.4"

Outlet: 1.4"

Core Thickness: 1.57"

Tank Wall Thickness: 2mm

Fill Neck: 1.25"

Drain Plug Thread Size: (M16) .06"

Drain Plug Thread Length: .047"

Purchase Includes:

Mishimoto Radiator

Mishimoto Radiator Cap

Magnetic Drain Plug

Limited Lifetime Warranty

Engine Codes:

RB25DET

RB26DETT

Chassis Codes:

R34

Note: Will Fit Turbo Applications Only

Note: This item is for Manual Transmission vehicles. For automatic applications, please purchase optional Mishimoto transmission cooler (P/N: MMTC-U)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The company that will be supplying the radiators will be Performance Werkz, Malaysia since they are the closest country to us where we can save on shipping cost.

Price will be at $390.00 shipped to anywhere in Australia which retail + shipping will come close to $500.00.

Those who has paid pls PM me your adress and contact no#. I will arrange the shipper to ship to your designated address. Those who are in Sydney can arrange COD.

Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...