Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Cool :)

Just remembered who bought it too.

My memory sucks these days.

Also I dont see Russ Newman's name on the entry list, anyone heard if the 32 is entering again this year?

Edit - just found him, in Open class this year

lol, you sure are a fountain of (mis)information zebra!!

but yeah spewing lofty is giving WTAC a pass this year. he can drive and they have been quietly playing with GTRs since jesus was in short pants. Jeff's shed is like an alladins cave of GTR.

the 180sx certainly has some bits and looks like some aero well set up as well, i have never herd anyone say to much horsepower is a bad thing before. Times are very quick are SA so i suspect it is well sorted

Any idea on what sort of times its running at Mallala?

Luke Fink

Really? Can he drive a car straight? He's a good drifter with great car control but does he know how to drive fast? I've never heard of him doing anything other than drift.

andrew you should drive it mate. don't let luke have all the fun...

Such a huge build with so much of your effort put into it mate, you need to enjoy it.

I dont fink its a good idea to have Luke drive it.

Any idea on what sort of times its running at Mallala?

Ran a 1'12 on Sunday in the Philcom Rally. Steve Knight beat him in his evo with a 1'11. Also I don't know if Willall are bringing their cars up but RH9 would be another to watch if it does make the trip up there.

Ran a 1'12 on Sunday in the Philcom Rally. Steve Knight beat him in his evo with a 1'11. Also I don't know if Willall are bringing their cars up but RH9 would be another to watch if it does make the trip up there.

Should do alright with the long straight at EC then.

RH9? as in the 9'sec Drag R34 thats never run a 9?

Really? Can he drive a car straight? He's a good drifter with great car control but does he know how to drive fast? I've never heard of him doing anything other than drift.

well i did actualy make that up, but one could be forgiven for thinking that fink drives for andrew. if you have ever watched any of the drifter unleashed or motive dvds.

Im sure andrew will be driving. he was on a tv show (blood sweat and gears) driving jet200 in its first build state. did pretty well to if i recal correctly

Im sure andrew will be driving. he was on a tv show (blood sweat and gears) driving jet200 in its first build state. did pretty well to if i recal correctly

Yeah against toranas, XY's and lebo's in ferrari's haha. It was a funny show.

He was prob the best driver there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...