Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For the money I would rather get genuine nismo 740s. The Nismo 740s are meant to be very good to tune with, as good as stock and better than the Nismo 555s.

Do it once, do it right.

deatchwerks are meant to be very good as well from what Ive read

I'm all for cost saving on things like the turbo, if its built to spec then its built to spec.

But injectors I believe are a different ball game. I'd get the Nismo's, they are what they are meant to be. Purpose built to replace the RB/SR side feeds.

Why not try find a genuine used set?

Otherwise get a FReddy and china rail + bosch (my 2nd choice and FReddy + T67 seems to = WIN)

I'm all for cost saving on things like the turbo, if its built to spec then its built to spec.

But injectors I believe are a different ball game. I'd get the Nismo's, they are what they are meant to be. Purpose built to replace the RB/SR side feeds.

deatchwerks are built to spec and with a proper spray pattern, they bolt straight in and are highly regarded, from what I've read they are just as good as the nismos and there is no reason to doubt them.

old truck turbo.

i just killed my 1st set of tyres. On 9 psi this 20g has no problems laying 3rds, going much better now with the correct spark plugs, its a 2nd hand motor and i never checked the plugs when i fitted it.

i took a rolling 1st 2nd 3rd video but for some reason it didnt record sound

25. Stock with injectors and turbo. Very curious to see what power it will make. Planning to be at eastern creek drift day next thursday

So whats your current opinion on the 9psi its on? Comparable to what?

I used the tight ass method, cut the water line above the banjo fitting then braze over the hole with an oxy and bolt back on!

alternatively you could just run a hose straight from the water source at the inlet manifold to a fitting in water return on the block..

alternatively you could just run a hose straight from the water source at the inlet manifold to a fitting in water return on the block..

More things to go wrong man.. useless hoses melting and crap like that.

Just block em.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...