Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

you mean 250rwkw @ approx 13psi while the turbo is still half asleep, should see at least 300rwkw on 20+psi - I hope..

Great result so far, looking very interesting. My SS1 made 244rwkw on 98 fuel and 279rwkw on Caltex Eflex so everyone can get a rough idea that it would be around 250rwkw on 98 fuel in its current setup. Keen to see what it does with everything sorted!

DVS JEZ how is the ebay manifold holding up? and what turbo is it running?

Im keen to get one of these turbo's but don't want to spend the money on a 6Boost manifold for a budget turbo...

$250 mani +750 turbo + 400 gate + 600 for intake and dump ect = $2K for 300kw, seems awesome to me.

DVS JEZ how is the ebay manifold holding up? and what turbo is it running?

Im keen to get one of these turbo's but don't want to spend the money on a 6Boost manifold for a budget turbo...

$250 mani +750 turbo + 400 gate + 600 for intake and dump ect = $2K for 300kw, seems awesome to me.

+500 for coilpacks

+700 for injectors

+500 for FMIC

+2000 for ecu and tune

+1000 for a clutch

+1000 for micselaneous bitsand pieces and fixing other little problems that may arise..

And lets hope your not paying for any labour...

2k for 300kw...yeah right...lol

are you still having troubles with the turbotech jez as i have one sitting in my shed and im on a bit of a tight budget also. and dont really want to fork out for a ebc if a turbotech is going to do the job

Someone on here made 330-340rwkw with a t67-25g (on 98) im pretty sure. So the td06sl2-20g should crack 300 with enough boost, And with much better response.

Will echo some earlier comments on this thread. I am very keen to see any engine that produces over 300rwkws on PULP98. Be it an SR20, EVO or RB25/26 or RB25/30. I think you will find that they often make 270-280. Occassionally 280-290rwkws....but I have never seen 300rwkws out of one .

So not sure why people say "should" regardign 20G compressors cracking 300.

Anyway, if current discussions pan out than I am going to billet compressor wheel on my 20G. So will be interesting to see if it loses power, makes power, loses response/makes response

Would you also be able to plot the boost curve? I am curious to see the difference between a 20 and 25. Especially since your VCT is off. Just means the extra compression and 500cc is working for you :cheers:

I think I'm expecting more also. There are plenty of results on Evo's to compare outright power against, I dont think outright power changes that much across engine types provided the motor can flow.

+500 for coilpacks

+700 for injectors

+500 for FMIC

+2000 for ecu and tune

+1000 for a clutch

+1000 for micselaneous bitsand pieces and fixing other little problems that may arise..

And lets hope your not paying for any labour...

2k for 300kw...yeah right...lol

Was talking about turbo upgrade and not the other stuff. Hypergear turbo's can get 300kw for $1550 but that's internal gate on standard manifold and you still need to make a intake. GT3076 again is either internal and might not make the power for more money.

Will echo some earlier comments on this thread. I am very keen to see any engine that produces over 300rwkws on PULP98. Be it an SR20, EVO or RB25/26 or RB25/30. I think you will find that they often make 270-280. Occassionally 280-290rwkws....but I have never seen 300rwkws out of one .

my mates GTR made 337kw in rear wheel drive mode on 98.

luv psi the controller should be fine i think its more of a gate issue. i think it made my turbo laggy because i only had the 7 pound spring so the controller was holding back 11 psi its to much. try and get your gate as close as possible to boost pressure then use the controller to fine tune. how did you go with the manifold

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thought is if you were just moving it forward and the upstream geometry remained the same, then no difference at all. But because the current one has the filter direct into the AFM inlet, you effectively have the best chance of a completely symmetric air flow profile upstream, and in, the AFM, whilst the aftermarket inlet thingo has a (small, to be sure) bend between the filter and the AFM. That would bias the flow to the outside of the bend (downstream of the bend) which might well reduce the size of the signal seen by the AFM, for the same total flow rate. Having said that: If you're proposing to make your inlet look like a hybrid of your existing one and the aftermarket one, such that there is no bend where the filter is clamped on... then I say it will be just fine. If there is going to be such a bend, then, if you can align the insertion of the AFM blade such that it is at right angles to the plane of the bend, then there is a better than even chance that the centreline velocity where the blade is will remain more or less the same, and the velocity will just be a little faster to the outside of that, and just a little slower to the inside. **This is not professional investment advice and you should consult a suitably qualified ouija board, tea leaves or the intestines of a goat for more accurate prognostication.
    • Hi Tao, Thanks for your reply.  It's been a while and I managed to get the valve stem seals replaced with the head on the car.  Unfortunately this didn't solve my issue, the car still smokes a lot after idling (to be honest during idle you can see a bit of blue smoke from the exhaust), same after deceleration. I will try disconnecting the valve cover breathers, do I leave the PCV valve in? By engine oil drain pipe, do you mean the turbo oil drain?
    • What about if you just give it direct 12v and earth?
    • Hi guys . Can someone help me  I bought an Android screen for my Nissan fuga but it won't turn on   
    • My guesstimate, with no real numbers to back it up, is it won't effect it greatly at all.its not a huge change in position, and I can't see the air flow changing from in turbulence that much based on distance, and what's in front of it. Johnny and Brad may have some more numbers to share from experience though.
×
×
  • Create New...