Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the way i worked it out was its probably revving to about 7000, maybe a bit less like most ppl do...

the graph doesnt show RPM but it does show rod speed.. so if 180kmh is close to 7000, 90kmh is close to 3500.

its a few rpm off but close enough, boost is definitely well and truly on before 4000. a good achievement.

no way 3500 is 90km :no:

Anyway out of curiosity and boredom I just laid my dyno sheet next to battery's..

Im sure many of you have done this already.. but im posting it.. :D

Not alot in it really, they are running almost identical boost , I have a fair bit more midrange torque and an extra 20kws at 5k, but nose over after 6k where they are both pulling 300kws,

Then he keeps pulling past 7 and smashes me..

Just remembering though I have alot less mods under the bonnet <<read excuse for losing... :Pbatterydynosheet.jpgtune300.jpg

Im not gunna bother comparing anything to Simons freak of nature....

well know how many revs it is if we know where the run ends.. speed and RPM are always relative. you will do double the speed at double the revs in the same gear etc.

nice comparo too :) i cant wait to pop a 20G on my SR

Aaww don't be sad Simon you know your my hero.

Its more the fact I can't be bothered converting all your dynosheet figures to something legible. :laugh:

I think u were making the same as me at 5Ooorpm

On low boost mine is about the same as yours at 5000rpm, high boost close to 30kw more

You guys need to screw more boost in... 2bar or bust :)

Edited by SimonR32

Yeah you can see my 20g making more on the green line but that was 21.5 psi which is 4psi more than the blue line and the gains were insignificant..As Roy said the little comp just can't push any harder ,its giving all she can give..especially on my setup..If I get a better manifold and plazmaman plenum and better cooler it could possibly push for a little more.. But looking at the comparison I would sooner just get a T67 than push this any further.

Not sure why battery didn't push more in..

Got a scanner Artz? I think I could use my broken ass Photoshop skills to overlay onto the same image..

Just re did all my cooler piping in 2.5"(was a mix of 2.25/2.5" before) and now i'm thinking maybe I should move to a bigger Throttle body, not sure if there is much point cause the stock one is still bigger than the 2.5" piping ??

Haha I was putting mine over a picture of yours on the computer, I was gunna trace it but gave up..its almost identical though with yours just dipping a Little between 4-6rpm

That's the same size as my cooler piping I guess there is hope for it yet :D

Got my T67 today and have a few questions.

It came with a 4" Anti surge compressor housing which i did not want i wanted a standard 4" Compressor housing. Will this matter that much?

What is the best way to block the water lines? The shorter of the 2 (Water return??) I was simply going to find a bolt wth the same pattern but shorter and bolt it in nice and tight with a coper washer.

Not sure what to do with the one that goes around the back of the block should i just cut it off shorter and fix a blocked off bit of hose on the other side? Or blank it off at the source, which im guessing is under the plenum?

Any help is appriciated keen to get her back together, tonight i have connected oil feed(One supplied with the turbo is a bit long) and return. Finished replacing exhaust manifold studds.

Also I have one of those NZ manifolds and i am not happy with the way the wastegate pipe comes out it is really really close to the body and air con lines.

Should i modify this pipe or just blank it off and run the gate off the turbin housing?

Also I have one of those NZ manifolds and i am not happy with the way the wastegate pipe comes out it is really really close to the body and air con lines.

Should i modify this pipe or just blank it off and run the gate off the turbin housing?

is this one of the mild steel ones from ebay? i was pretty keen to get one of these for my rb20 anymore negatives?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...