Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nice. After my playing with turbos I was just going to go with my one but went T67 just so I could baseline my results against others as I am still not sure about the performance of my new kinder surprise engine. I have said this before but this time will follow through. Need to get my car over to you for a few runs so I can understand whether its far off what a T67 setup can do,

I am making 325rwklws at 18psi falling to 16psi from about 5,500rpm onwards. After PI am going to make a few changes then will give it a few runs. Feels pretty healthy at 16psi and will be pretty easy on the engien and the track...also a little easier on the RB20 box

its all good, i know what its like, i have a similar list of things i never get done :P just let me know in advance and we will do whatever we can to help out.

That isn't flash! What setup, assuming stock SR20 with bolton internal unit? How much boost, was that maxed out? Looking at one for that kind of setup....

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2

STD 1988 laurel RB20 @ 19psi wont make anymore no matter what @ 19psi... @ 23psi today it made 245kw but id prefer to leave it at 19 psi... was hoping for 250 @ 19psi but impossible. the HKS GT2535 had alot more topend... but laggier.

dont get me wrong area under the curve is great and it drives well, but car has full comp grip setup and 230-240kw is struggle town on new semis at drift days.

post-34927-0-73198900-1367748464_thumb.jpg

Ok so i just had my rb20 tuned with adjustable cam gears td05 18g. He is saying that the boost is spiking to 22 psi and then dropping to 18psi. I was wondering if its the gate that could be doing this. Its just making 190kw and thats just not enough for me.

I do have a cheaper vband gate on there swapping it to a turbosmart.

I have 750cc e85 injectors bad idea if i just go e85

Can anyone help

I've done a TD05-18G on an SR from Kando, which works well. Has done a couple of tens of thousand K's since install and countless beatings.

Holds 16psi well with a minor tapper.

The TD05H-18G gives reasonable down low with a sudden surge onto good power at the 3700 mark. Motor is an SRDE non VCT. VCT models would do better in terms of spool character.

Back to this - after much umming and ahhing the PE1420 from a certain S14 is going to be replaced with a Kando TD05-16G, T25 internally gated with the 3" intake housing and will fabricate to suit. Will be interesting to see how that performs :)

Back to this - after much umming and ahhing the PE1420 from a certain S14 is going to be replaced with a Kando TD05-16G, T25 internally gated with the 3" intake housing and will fabricate to suit. Will be interesting to see how that performs :)

A birdy told me that one of our SAU commoners saw 300+ at the hubs from his stock E9 turbo on 25psi (TD05HR-16G6 for those unawares).

I am also in talks with Stao to consider a high flow small inducer turbo for my own SR, the thought itself came from the 16G6 wheel which is a 50 trim 68mm wheel :) Thus I will be very keen to see your said 16G6 results also. Don't be shy with the boost though! It should be great.

  • Like 1

I know people who have done ~300kw @ hubs from stock EVO 9 turbos as well, as well as EVO3 16Gs with the bigger comp and turbine housings. We are going the non-EVO fit EVO3 spec 16G with 8cm housing so I'm picking we'll be able to make some decent power. The car only has a 2.5bar sensor so we can't get too carried away with boost, but I am sure we'll still get OK results :)

Sounds mickey mouse. On E85 the sensor shouldn't hold you back too much, safety margins will be in place from the fuel alone to let you push beyond the absolute MAP reading.

Looking forward to seeing what its got. Hopefully big spool and 300+ at the hubs.

Its a stock engine, with a stock gearbox, and a track car which had more power than braking/traction last time it was out so pushing the turbo to it's limit right at the start (we've already maxed out and popped a PE1420 lol) is not the highest priority :P It will make more than enough power on 18-20psi at this stage. When the VE head goes on things will get more interesting ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...