Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

mine were maxing before it cut.

so my informeter told me anyway.

so i was forced to baby the car around lol

emanage can clamp the aiflow at 4.6 as mine is.. anything after that is mapped by a boost sensor plugged into the emanage.

Yeah the Informeter suggests I max my injectors out without the suction.; hardly have to baby it - its first/second gear at 5k where I get into the upper region.

But yeah - mapping the extra airflow via boost sensor sounds fine to me. Its just clamping it at 4.6 WITHOUT the emanage that sounds like danger to me

So the suction pipe doesn't max the injectors just the AFM? If that's the case wouldn't a fuel cut defender fix that by clamping at say 4.6V? If the injectors are maxed then obviously needs bigger injectors.

If you're gonna cut fuel what's the point of flowing more air?

Am I missing something here?

mine were maxing before it cut.

so my informeter told me anyway.

so i was forced to baby the car around lol

emanage can clamp the aiflow at 4.6 as mine is.. anything after that is mapped by a boost sensor plugged into the emanage.

I've got the MAP sensor installed but doesn't seem there's a need to use it...>_<

Yeah the Informeter suggests I max my injectors out without the suction.; hardly have to baby it - its first/second gear at 5k where I get into the upper region.

But yeah - mapping the extra airflow via boost sensor sounds fine to me. Its just clamping it at 4.6 WITHOUT the emanage that sounds like danger to me

yeh it probably is a bigger danger doing it without bigger injectors.. which cant be done without an EMU

If you're gonna cut fuel what's the point of flowing more air?

Am I missing something here?

lol fuel cutdefender in this case would be used to clamp the voltage of AFM to 4.6v.. allowing it to rev freely without an air flow cut.

I've got the MAP sensor installed but doesn't seem there's a need to use it...>_<

it adds fuel to the map if you have more boost.

ie. cold whether more boost - the map sensor will add fuel to keep it safe. get cihan to set it up

Ironpaw had a tune done before the map sensor was installed, so after 4.6 volts, cihan guessed the mapping, which he is really good at.

when he goes for the next tune, cihan will integrate it with the emanage

Whats wrong with your 3 dials? My boost gauge isn't working, but I found a thread on Scotty's soldering fix, so I'll do that, get it working, then think about changing it :D

mines an RX, only RS had the dials and the relevant sensors/loom etc. so if i cant get it working, ill be selling all the working bits and going a double DIN

the voltage readout works lol and i think if i change the BCM ill get the attesa working too. the boost sensor is missing the plug in the enging bay loom. but i rekon the wiring is there

i think there were tests done and raising the back of the bonnet doesnt really work. bonnet vents are the only real way to get air out :(

did you run a line from the battery directly to the pump? then its 14.4v already :P

i think there were tests done and raising the back of the bonnet doesnt really work. bonnet vents are the only real way to get air out :(

Would creating a vent at back of the bonnet by timing the plastic trim on the back of the bonnet?

Cheers

Andy

i think there were tests done and raising the back of the bonnet doesnt really work. bonnet vents are the only real way to get air out :(

did you run a line from the battery directly to the pump? then its 14.4v already :P

Depends what else you do while raising it....trimmed some plastic out so it can flow/get dragged out.

I used a 12v relay...so it's 12v at the moment....If I need to step it up I will use the other one I got from Scott.

the voltage readout works lol and i think if i change the BCM ill get the attesa working too. the boost sensor is missing the plug in the enging bay loom. but i rekon the wiring is there

Did you want a factory boost sensor Iain or did you get one from the wreck?

Well that sounds like verdict is rip it off until I have done injectors, emanage and fuel pump? DAMMIT! And I was so looking forward to dyno day!

Wouldn't have thought a standard car with plenum spacer, exhaust and suction pipe would have maxed out the injectors?

Well that sounds like verdict is rip it off until I have done injectors, emanage and fuel pump? DAMMIT! And I was so looking forward to dyno day!

Wouldn't have thought a standard car with plenum spacer, exhaust and suction pipe would have maxed out the injectors?

I would leave it on until and see what the tuner can get out of it.....remember he will lean it off....you may get away with it running at about 92% duty cycle on standard boost!

I would leave it on until and see what the tuner can get out of it.....remember he will lean it off....you may get away with it running at about 92% duty cycle on standard boost!

I just spoke to Andrew, he was recommending a tune just with the exhaust. Sounds like I can do it without doing injectors etc, but excuse my ignorance can I get it tuned without going Emanage? I've only ever had one car tuned, and that was the R31 after I did the engine rebuild. Not exactly sophisticated so it was just done at Ultra Tune.

I just spoke to Andrew, he was recommending a tune just with the exhaust. Sounds like I can do it without doing injectors etc, but excuse my ignorance can I get it tuned without going Emanage? I've only ever had one car tuned, and that was the R31 after I did the engine rebuild. Not exactly sophisticated so it was just done at Ultra Tune.

Unfortunately not on the stock ECU. Unless you send it to Japan.. :whistling:

Exhaust, Sierra S1 and stock boost you should get away with no injections with the E-Manage tune....or Exhaust, Suction Pipe, standard turbo and stock boost!....maybe!...anything more and you are pushing the envelope like I did!...not fun!

You will be in the 90% duty cycle mark more than likely.....so make sure your injectors are alway's clean!

Edited by Jetwreck

I just spoke to Andrew, he was recommending a tune just with the exhaust. Sounds like I can do it without doing injectors etc, but excuse my ignorance can I get it tuned without going Emanage? I've only ever had one car tuned, and that was the R31 after I did the engine rebuild. Not exactly sophisticated so it was just done at Ultra Tune.

Yep. No tune for u unless u get an emu installed...or a fcon...

Lol at ultratune 'tuning' cars!!

Edited by ironpaw

Yep. No tune for u unless u get an emu installed...or a fcon...

Lol at ultratune 'tuning' cars!!

Yeah agree, but it was just timing, nothing complex! Thats my excuse and I'm sticking to it!

Off to buy an Emanage then... any suggestions where?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...