Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

must look at this once I get my launch diagun back.. I do not remember seeing a menu for HVAC in the earlier cars. it IS there for the later ones (V35/V36)

fari point about the undocumneted BUS as well.

$1E - (B7) that is the compressor control relay. output. writing to that will fire the compressor up.

$13 - (B4) AC request input from HVAC unit.

$43,$47 - that is where I would be playing myself.

*looks* like you can get access to it IF the unit supports it.

I'll have a look for the actuation tests once my diagun comes back.

"basically not", are you saying that you can communicate with the AC control unit (at least on your R33 GTS/whatever real model it is), i.e. it exists on the consult bus?

At least for my 33 gtst, a positive definate maybee.

in short, there are active tests for the doors (fresh/recycled air, dash/vent/foot) and fan test with 2 speed etc etc but you can only adjust the cabin temp by +-2 Deg (not enough)

however the mysterious test 0x44, could easly set the temp and more ( the temp range could be covered in 5 bits, leaving 3 spare), I just havn't found any further info on ox44, or had the time to sus it out.

the potential is high to hijack the A/C via Consult, however it does seem to fall in the 'just to easy' category

attatched the file, see last page, last couple of lines

Generic_Nissan_ECU_Sensor_or_Data_register_table_Ver_2.pdf

Bundy

ps piped by slow typing AGAIN !!

Edited by BundyBear

$42 - set temp location. VAL/16 is the word to write to it. that LOOKS like the right spot.

looking further at that I *think that is the cabin temp sensor read location. correct me here.

fond of the unknown myself, but having the standard controls and consult access woult be very nice, best-O-both worlds

yea can't leave God's country but ...hehe

got a bro-inlaw up there but ... another 33

Edited by BundyBear

$42 - set temp location. VAL/16 is the word to write to it. that LOOKS like the right spot.

looking further at that I *think that is the cabin temp sensor read location. correct me here.

I read as:

0x20 0x21 0x22 Temp sensors

0x42 target temp (ie display temp) 0x40 as a trim

then again there's

0x26 sun load, could be a calculated value?

& 29, 2A

Edited by BundyBear

when ive got some time ill try get the consult2 out and sus it out.

if there are any official listing of the names of the data sensors, and active tests, from the service manual (i.e. like how most service manuals have, in the EC section, an on-board diagnostics bit which lists all the data sensors/active tests and what they mean), that'd make things easier to find.

once I get my launch back I'll take a few snaps of the data screen. I usually have a R32,33 handy to fiddle with so it wont be an issue.

I read as:

0x20 0x21 0x22 Temp sensors

0x42 target temp (ie display temp) 0x40 as a trim

then again there's

0x26 sun load, could be a calculated value?

& 29, 2A

$26 - that will affect the $40 value. unsure by how much though.

would be good to have one of these things mocked up on a bench with all the sensors attached. that way you could write to the registers and see what you could and could not access.

What init string are you using, from memory the documented DF ecu does not respond over my consult, I do have something at 0xE7 which afaik is undocumented, always thought this might be the a/c on a 33? Either that or ABS.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, sort of blurring two different things together, aren't we? I just meant O2 feedback closed loop. I used to have a 0-1V LCD meter on my dash, wired directly to the O2 sensor signal. So you could easily see what it was doing. Normal running it would flick back and forth nicely. Slow down to an idle and it would keep flicking, as the ECU tried to servo to maintain stoich, but it would slow down as each swing happened until it would stay at one end of the scale. As I said above, the sensor heater is not enough to keep it hot enough when there is also little heat in the exhaust flow. Give it a blip and it would start swinging again, then peter out again. Meanwhile, idle speed control would run just fine, because unrelated.
    • It's not even O2 feedback, it's just simply when the ECU sees the closed TPS signal for whatever reason the idle will start steadily dropping until the engine dies. With the TPS adjusted to not trigger closed TPS it will idle at some ridiculously high RPM and something like 6 degrees of timing. In the absence of getting eyes on it personally and a lot of quality time doing diagnostics I couldn't tell you what the real problem was but it was interesting nonetheless
    • Oof. One of my mates has an R34 GT-R that he initially was a "I want to go twins for response and convenience" on his stock 2.6 with Kelford 272 cams, but his friends are pests and were always in his ear about their place being in the bin.   Eventually one of the 2860-5s decided to add it's own input and force his hand, so he conceded and went for a Pulsar 6262G ("G35 900") with T4 0.85 hotside.    Here's an overlay of the results, same cams, same stock bottom end, same boost, same fuel, just from a pretty tidy 2860-5 install to a Pulsar turbo on a 6boost maniifold on BP98.   Worth mentioning here, it may seem like a dead horse thing but the dyno plot doesn't tell the story of how much better it is to drive - transient response has completely changed the car, he used to have flat foot shifting to stop it having to wind up again on gear changes even at >7000rpm... now it builds boost faster than that even short shifting.   It's 100% transformed the car before you even consider how much better it holds on: Pulsar and Garrett aren't the same, but from our experience if you're just looking for a better drive and the ability to make the same or more power I think the divided G30 770 would probably be the smallest I'd go to.
    • Great work Duncan, any events local you will give it a test once all done? 
×
×
  • Create New...