Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Like that last one!

edit: IMO Its a shame the lights don't continue on the left.. maybe if you're bored it could be a photoshop exercise for ya :D

right at the edge of the screen? that's an easy fix if that's what you mean :)

Love the unique bar, skirts and rear pods on that beast. Gives it a real ground effect without being overly done. Tell the owner it looks great!

Thanks Eric, I'll let the old man know. But you do realise that all Camry Sportivo's came with that kit, right? :P

so, went for a little ride last night (2 1/2 hours, lol) to take some photos of the sunrise in the city.

180262_1646451594252_1025781561_31424228_7749069_n.jpg

but this was the main reason i went in. been wanting to light paint this for a while. spewing i stuffed it up tho. its been too long, ive forgotten how fast i have to move lights, lol. will be going back to hit it up again as soon as i can.

179254_1646471314745_1025781561_31424259_1980635_n.jpg

So for the rest of the morning I just walked around taking HDR's.

168167_1646464314570_1025781561_31424248_5076508_n.jpg

180851_1646464474574_1025781561_31424249_8331839_n.jpg

167067_1646464634578_1025781561_31424250_6615310_n.jpg

179327_1646464754581_1025781561_31424251_5193023_n.jpg

adelaide can be an awesome looking city in the early hours.

This is a shot i took at yallingup

its a bit stalker-ish, i dont even know the guy but na_goodness assured me "There's a fineline between stalking and photography, you're still well above it" haha

so here you go

post-62384-0-30958600-1296715393_thumb.jpg

daaaaaymmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm jay. killing it. each one of those shots is gold man! loving the skys, loving how you haven't over done and killed the hdr. not many people understand what hdr is about but you sir, seem to have it covered. keep em coming.

nice shot too, passive. very lonely. done well.

I had a go at some commercial shots during my lunch break at work today. 3 strobes. One for the back wall, 2 on the car. I'm really happy with how these are turning out. Must be the square little model I was using...

5412199395_ab04ab9e03_b.jpg

5412223535_d5c55cba5c_b.jpg

CC the hell out of me. Pretty new to working this look so ideas/tips/hates/loves will be useful. cheers!

OK Matboy. As requested. Some pics of the BEASTS at work. I took my lil Olympus 8MP camera with me today and just so happened to get some free spare time in the middle of the day when I was not operating my digger as they were training another bloke to drive it. So I took a drive around the pit and clicked away!

Keep in mind I am not profesional and it was a basic camera. I just wanted to show you guys what I do for a living.

This is the Shovel I operate

stuff034.jpg

It weighs 300ton and will pick up about 50ton in a scoop,

stuff037.jpg

This is a brand new caterpillar D11 dozer. They dont make em any bigger than this!

stuff041.jpg

stuff042.jpg

stuff043.jpg

This is our biggest trucks. they carry 400ton on their back.

stuff048.jpg

stuff046.jpg

stuff047.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...