Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

from what i understand japan has the same "premium unleaded" fuels, or at least similar ones to us, but the 100 ron is called "super unleaded". maybe some of the members on here who have been to japan, or live there could fill us in on a bit more info.....

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm getting around 350kms a full tank, somethings not right.

that all depends. how many litres are you calling a full tank? what sort of driving are you doing? do you let the car warm up before driving? how long does the temp gauge come up to the middle of the gauge (normal operating temp)?

that all depends. how many litres are you calling a full tank? what sort of driving are you doing? do you let the car warm up before driving? how long does the temp gauge come up to the middle of the gauge (normal operating temp)?

Not sure but $60 is roughly a full tank of 98, thats from almost redline empty to completely full. City driving to and from work, generally a 20km trip but it can be stop start traffic. I generally dont let it warm up for more than 30 seconds every startup but nor do i hammer it at all in the first 10 minutes. Doesn't take the temp gauge long at all maybe 5 minutes if that. My best mate who drives a S2 R33 N/A gets easily over 100km more a tank than me and he drives a bit quicker than me.

Not sure but $60 is roughly a full tank of 98, thats from almost redline empty to completely full. City driving to and from work, generally a 20km trip but it can be stop start traffic. I generally dont let it warm up for more than 30 seconds every startup but nor do i hammer it at all in the first 10 minutes. Doesn't take the temp gauge long at all maybe 5 minutes if that. My best mate who drives a S2 R33 N/A gets easily over 100km more a tank than me and he drives a bit quicker than me.

based off roughly $1.45 a litre, $60 is only about 41L, meaning you still have about 24L left in the tank (if they are like a 33 with a 65L tank), and about 10 to 15L before the fuel light comes on. at 41L and 350kms you are using approx 11.7L/100kms, which isn't too bad for city driving.

Hey,

I have a 33 gtst, i get bout 11 -12L/ 100km's

You'll use more fuel depending on how many cold starts you do too, and if it was a gtst and now gts, then you should be able to run alot more ignition timing, like fully advanced, that would help it alot, be much more lively and better on fuel, correct me if im wrong...j

but 10-12 would be the best you can get id say, and thats not that bad...

what would be wrong with that, if its the car is designed to have a turbo on it, and now it doesnt, cant it handle major advancing ???

how would that be worse than 10psi of turbo pressure thru it?? the motor is basically lacking now isnt it???

i advanced my ignition fully with the turbo and didnt even ping that i could hear, not that im saying to do that with a turbo, just saying without the turbo should be able to tune it alot more agressively..

:wacko:

yes you could run full advanced timing on a RB25DET with the turbo removed, however it will still be putting out about 40hp less than a natro motor and use more fuel as you will have to floor it everywhere to not get overtaken by an 80 year old lady in her 1970's corolla

also if you were able to run full advance on your natro without hearing any pinging then either you need to learn more about what pinging sounds like, or realise that not all pinging is audible to the human ear over the sound of the engine.

based off roughly $1.45 a litre, $60 is only about 41L, meaning you still have about 24L left in the tank (if they are like a 33 with a 65L tank), and about 10 to 15L before the fuel light comes on. at 41L and 350kms you are using approx 11.7L/100kms, which isn't too bad for city driving.

Oh you're good.... I don't have a fuel light :(

yes they all have a fuel light. it may be blown though (or there is a short in the system or issue with the sender). but they generally all come on with about 10L left in the tank, so if you are filling up with less than around 55L then you aren't getting the tank low enough for the light to come on. there are a few ways to test if the light is working. 1 is to pull the return line off the injector rail and run it into a bucket then run the car until it either runs out of fuel or the light comes on (best to do when the car is low on fuel). another would be to pull the fuel gauge sender out of the tank. yet another would be to figure out which wire in the fuel sender wiring is the one that sends the signal to the dash and short it out and see if the light comes on. or you could simply drive around with a few litres of fuel in a jerry can and just keep driving until either the light comes on or you run out of fuel.

i also have a feeling that in the 33's it doesn't come on until below the line. i don't think mine came on until it was at the top of the E

Change your spark plugs, run 95 at least, change your o2 sensor and get a pod filter which will help. Clean your AFM and maybe clean your injectors. If nothing changes i highly suggest get a SAFC it will get you extra power and much better fuel economy. I used to get 250ks a tank i got a SAFC and a tune and i got more power and was average 450-500ks a tank.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...