Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Too true Devil but u have to consider others too. 50km/hr and my old skyline (1980 c210) feel like 120km/hr in my old supra and in a semi modded r33 u can up that by 50 more ks. So basically ure playing in a higher bracket the better car u get.

If you hit someone doing 50 its alot different from 150. Sure better brakes etc etc but accidents happen and ive been in ghost car incident before. God has a cloaking device and hes not afraid to use it.

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

At the end of the day i think that unless a person Attitude does not change (does not mature, or find the difference between right and wrong) nothing will change, like alot of things in life there is the good and bad people for all the good people this may make there life harder *if police target HP cars* but then again it should make it easier to catch the bad people and take them off our streets.

To me this new law is tring to do that

I like the idea, but tehn again if it will work or not is another story and we will see in the next few months

im gettin the feelin that most of us have the same opinion on this

this new laws not going to be the problem

its the fact that just like yellows and dangerous driving its left up to individual officers

having coped the usual cop v young bloke crap it scares me a little

ive got yellows and fines for sum pretty petty stuff (and sum i deserved)

i dont wanna lose the sky cause some cop thinks i took of to quick at the lites

It will be only when a 60 year old gets his/her 89 Camry impounded and goes on TT that something MAY be done.

As Colin Barnett said. It's a draconian law which, may increase the number of stolen cars and violence against police.

Why doesn't the public in WA have a voice against these wacked out ideas I'll never know!

All i gotta say is that now i'm always checking for the boys in blue.

I just wish the gov. would figure ways round the problems rather than coming up with stupid laws.

I would like to see a small dragstrip or track easily accsesible to the public..and nearby so tht if u see some1 wanting to try his stuff against urs u take it off the street and have a good clean/safe run.

Kwinana once a week is too far too little for me...

I don't know maybe there is one around and i don't even know about it?... is there!?

-Dan

I think the laws are a knee-jerk, as a few other people said. I too, am scared that it's all upto "The coppers interpretation" of what hooning is.

I drive down a street at about 30km/h and just the BOV sounding quietly together with a loud exhaust is enough to get the onlookers yelling at me to slow down! It's all about perception, an older cop will think that someone is "hooning" before a younger cop will.

I've yet to meet a decent copper, however many times I try to be civil and show respect to them, I get reamed. Sorry boys, you've ruined it for yourselves!

I now take each and every infringement to court and play hardball with them, as they do to me. Tit for Tat, it's only fair.

The police have the power of autonomy in situations relating to infringements, whatever they say goes, and WE have to prove OUR innocence. That's not right, anywhere in the world.

It's a whole new can of worms being opened I see......

Kwinana is too far? meh, its not far at all, you want another small strip ? how about wannaroo? We get looked after pretty damn good as far as drag racing goes in perth any excuse for street racing that includes, there is no where to race, is just bullshit.

Maybe im just being old.

This is tough but fair legislation. It is the result of extensive consultation on the part of our Government through the establishment of an interagency working group to examine this issue.

translated: we got some angry residents, some old people and some grumpy traffic cops together, showed them videos of today tonight footage until they were frothing at the mouths, and then gave them a texta and a pad of butchers paper and let them wank on.....

what a ****ing joke.

I know I'm not far wrong. I have to run wankshops like these, and participate in them at my work. theyre a joke and theyre very dangerous.

people with no background knowledge, biased opinions and minimal education making broad sweeping generalisations, demanding theat they be given their chance to save the world and the worst part - at the end of it, when all that has been minuted is emotive claptrap, someone turns it into policy!?

the process is then made 100 times worse if there happens to be a local government politician in the room somewhere...... but that's a story for another day.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...