Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Car: '95 GTR R33 V-Spec, RB26DETT

Miles: 24,000

Current Condition: Bone Stock

Have ordered most of the STD goodies to prepare for this buildup:

* Nismo TwinPlate

* PFC w/Commander & Datalogit

* Fuel Rail, Pump, Lines

* HKS Type R Intercooler

* 264 Cams, Cam gears, etc

etc, etc, etc...

Just finished my RX7 single project, Large Street Port 13b w/Garrett GT35/40, put down 420rwhp @ 16psi (94 Octane pump) and just over 500rwhp @ 22psi (100 Octane). Get excellent spool for my driving habits, starts boosting by 3800rpm, full boost by 4500 - 4800rpm & 9000rpm redline.

Would like to have similar spool and performance caracteristics on the GTR and looking for insight on a single turbo choice for it. The car will be 98% street driven, with a current power goal of 600awhp (US Dynojet). Am currently looking at the Garrett GT40R or GT42R. Will the GT40R take me to 600awhp? Are there other singles I should be considering?

Thanks for your expertise, opinions and advice!

K

Just my personal opinion, having driven both big single and twin high mount versions, I much prefer twin terbs for the street. They tend to be more responsive and give a broader torque curve.

Also, there is no sound on earth like a GTR with two large highmounts spooling up!

my personal opinion , sorry to say this to you GAV but ive also had both twin turbo and single turbo set up in my gtr's and i can honestly tell you that there is no beter feeling, then driving a gtr with single conversion, (eg t78 or t88) waiting for the boost to kick in and hearing the external wastegate open up will serioulsy demolish any thoughts of twin turbo set up being beter, sorry no offence its just my 5 cents.

HKS T04r cut back, or the new HKS T04z.

Both support around 600hp, although the T04z is newer and is supposed to spool up quicker due to the holes drilled in the compressor cover.

Trust T-78 either 33, or 34D.

thats for high mount single.

However, it would be very hard to achieve (on an un-stroked RB26) 600hp and have full boost hit by 4500rpm. thats with any turbo.

I know two people who have made 320rwkw on thier R33 GTR's with HKS 2530's. These are a low mount bolt on application.

They have a great spool and would hit full boost around 4500rpm.

how much does 320 rwkw equate to in HP?

if u r aiming for 600ps or less then the best option would be to go 2 lowmount turbos ..maybe twin trust t51z's or twin hks 2540's or gt-rs's ..that way it will give the best response and torque ..however if u want to go down the single turbo path ..maybe a to4z cutback ..or trust t78 or even a t67 for good response ...there are other things we need to know like are u going to rebuild the engine and gearbox options!

nocab72,

according to Ray Hall's turbo match app, it seems that with a rev limit of 9000rpm and 26psi on an RB26, you will require a GT42 with A/R 1.22 exhaust housing which would give you ~700bhp and 64lb/min worth of air flow.

http://www.turbofast.com.au/TFmatch.html

yeah, it sounds all good and sweet but then again, i'm not too sure how this turbo would be for a street GTR, i would dare say that it would be quite laggy down low but with a monstrous top end power band.

Hi nocab72, my suggestion would be a Garrett GT35R, good for 700 bhp less around 60 hp for losses on a 4wd hub dyno. However I wouldn't be aiming for that sort of power on standard RB26 internals, particularly pistons and conrod bolts.

As for spool up, being a 3.9 litre 6 cylinder 2 stroke, 13B rotaries have a lot of exhaust gas flow. If you want that sort of boost build out of an RB26, I would suggest around 2.7 litres with 9 to 1 compression ratio, porting and a good dose of ceramic coating.

Hope that is of some help.

Hi Harry, looks awesome. What else have you done, other than 2.8 litres of course?

Full spec here

PS; Why di they stop the run at 7,000 rpm?

run went to 7500rpm - chart updated now (my mistake) - limited as no need to run further - engine was set up for max torque on or around 4000rpm onwards

Nice graph there Harry, how is the car to drive? Happy with it?

Excellent!!! and v happy so far - havent really had a chance to drive it in anger yet - still a bit wet here :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...