Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Excellant work bobby I commend you.

Thought I'd add I was working for APC in springwood couple years

ago, in which I had the pleasure of working on a Bathurst r31 skyline.

I was told by the owner that during the racing year of 1987 the budget was

3 million dollars. Replacement cost of the exhaust manifold on the car was surprisingly

10 thousand dollars!

Excellant work bobby I commend you.

Thought I'd add I was working for APC in springwood couple years

ago, in which I had the pleasure of working on a Bathurst r31 skyline.

I was told by the owner that during the racing year of 1987 the budget was

3 million dollars. Replacement cost of the exhaust manifold on the car was surprisingly

10 thousand dollars!

Thank you

Was that rod marklands old car the R31 rb20 turbo?

There has been a slight change in this build with cam selection. Previously mentioned we were using IN EX 260 10.25 lift Tomei now we will be using IN 270 10.25 lift EX 260 10.25 Lift still Tomei cams, John has done some further calculations and found this to be the best combination for the motor.

I will get more info on why he has decided on this Intake cam!!

Do you get a cam card with the Tomei camshafts?

If so do you know what the IVO, IVC, EVO and EVC degrees are?

Those figures should actually be decided on by the engine builder. The info they supply (Tomei etc) are for a given lobe centre figure. That why i laugh everytime i read some-one quoting cam sprocket degree adjustsments as cam settings. . Unless you know where the cams are set ie: lobe centres before you start playing with them your just guessing and hoping for the best...

Good to hear your getting close to start up Bobby :thumbsup:

  • 2 weeks later...

headpic.jpg

The above pic shows the external oil supply tot he head , No oil will be supplied from the block. We can alos control the amount of oil for the head.

The above video, John has give a light skim of the head, he only took off 2 thou.

Motor is ready for final check and finished off very soon

Huge respect for this build, proven builds are great in practice and economic terms, but there is something to be said about the satisfaction of looking outside the box and creating solutions which push the boundaries. To succeed doing this is to properly achieve something, however just dumping a bunch of cash at a workshop to build your car to 400kw using the same methods that have been used a million times before, is just that, very little has been learned, and in my mind, very little has been achieved.

Huge respect for this build, proven builds are great in practice and economic terms, but there is something to be said about the satisfaction of looking outside the box and creating solutions which push the boundaries. To succeed doing this is to properly achieve something, however just dumping a bunch of cash at a workshop to build your car to 400kw using the same methods that have been used a million times before, is just that, very little has been learned, and in my mind, very little has been achieved.

Thank you for your comment.

Yes its not the money its all about getting it right

We have also changed the headgasket to a 0.9mm Nismo Gt500 gasket from the 1.00 mm cometic, and the final deack height is +4 thou and using the 0.9mm head gasket we can achieve 33 thou squish.

With this quench distance, static compression 10:1 what boost pressure will be achievable to make the power you want?

With this quench distance, static compression 10:1 what boost pressure will be achievable to make the power you want?

Squish at 33 thou 10: 1 comp - boost in manifold will be 34psi and in the cylinder i think john said this will become like 15 psi.

In the documents with calculation there is a right about boost pressure.

Bobby, early on you mentioned that John looked at making a custom plenum for this engine... can you go into any detail on what was proposed before you scrapped the idea?

I have been looking at "Lehmann" style plenums recently and wondering if this is what John was considering.

There was a really good thread on the hydridz forums about a 'lehmann' style dual plenum inlet manifold being designed and made for an L28 I think it was. It was a long thread but had alot of drawings and CFD testing done with the guys design, think he got it all CNC machined out of two big chunks of billet in the end. Looked amazing!

Damn you Michael! I want to make one now!

There was a really good thread on the hydridz forums about a 'lehmann' style dual plenum inlet manifold being designed and made for an L28 I think it was. It was a long thread but had alot of drawings and CFD testing done with the guys design, think he got it all CNC machined out of two big chunks of billet in the end. Looked amazing!

Damn you Michael! I want to make one now!

I read it! :)

I want to design one and I want you to make it... I am so time poor it is making me sick.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have you done the Ignition Sync Wizard in the AEM software?
    • Find out what RPM it was idling at with the IACV unplugged. It's very weird that the rpm didn't change at all, and then it stalled. When it stalls is it nearly like a switch off, like you've turned the engine off? Or is it more stutters and sputters and coughs to death over a few seconds? Or does the RPM just slowly keep going down and down? Have you done a test of trying to start it with the AFM unplugged? Does it still die?     If you Follow Josh's advice on using Nistune to check the voltages (which is a perfect method!) if you see anything out of wack voltage wise, THEN get the multimeter out and read the voltage directly at the sensor. If the two vary, then you're now looking for a wiring issue vs a sensor issue. So be aware, what the ECU sees, may not be what the sensor is actually saying too...
    • You very likely need to get it on a dyno and tune it. My assumption is, you've got an RB25DET tune in it, which has a different manifold, different injectors, and different cams as a minimum. What O2 sensor are you running?   When you say it runs extremely rich from idle all the way to redline, is this just free revving it you see that?
    • I seem to the be only person that is using a Haltech 2500 on an NA motor, I've installed a Bosch DBW throttle body to the OEM intake manifold and am having problems maintaining AFR even with the wideband o2.  It will run extremely rich at idle and up to redline, but under load it will go extremely lean in the 20s and i'm essentially having to rev it over 4k and feather the clutch to get it up to speed.  I've read a few other threads of about the butterfly, it seems removing the vacuum to it is supposed to have it remain open, i've noticed no difference under 4k with the vacuum line to it plugged.  I'm hoping someone here has had luck using the NA manifold with Haltech, and if they happen to have a tune for it.  
    • I don't know any details, but I really wouldn't be surprised if they do it as a LHD only version, at least initially.
×
×
  • Create New...