Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Cut and pasted from another disco post:

700177-2 ... GT2835 52T with 84T turbine

700177-3 ... GT2835 56T with 84T turbine

700177-4 ... GT2835 56T with 90T turbine

So is the -3 the one to get for a stock RB25? What ID's does everyone else have?

I run the 4" Garrett 3076 with 3" reducer and have no issues. Now I know that the specs for the HKS are different and could do different things, but all things considered, I reckon you'll be fine with it.

  On 09/03/2011 at 6:27 AM, tridentt150v said:

I run the 4" Garrett 3076 with 3" reducer and have no issues. Now I know that the specs for the HKS are different and could do different things, but all things considered, I reckon you'll be fine with it.

Great to hear mate thanks for the first hand experience! So you run the reducer straight off the turbo then a 3" 45/90 deg bend to the afm?

Mine came with a reducer to the Intake pipe. I'm pretty sure its 4" on the turbo, definitely bigger than the intake pipe. I'll measure it on the weekend.

  On 09/03/2011 at 12:05 AM, Harey said:

See thats the thing all the people on here that I have spoken to with the Pro S (joeyjoejoe, 75coupe and others) all have the 3" intake.

Are you sure the Pro S kits came with a 4" to 3" reducer at the turbo? As far as I know the Pro S kits have been discontinued and only the KAI is still made.

  On 09/03/2011 at 7:55 AM, Harey said:

That would be great Fat_Tony, that would put the issue to rest.

Out of interest what results did you get from yours? Do you have a dyno sheet in the dyno thread?

No sheet. 345rwhp on 18psi. I think its a little low but my engine old and tired. Almost dead.

I have 700177-3 ... GT2835 56T with 84T turbine as well harey, 4" at turbo and 3" intake with black reducer. I think we have identical huffers but your dump is a little different by memory??

Im gonna run the 3" intake, my tuner (Unigroup) reckons its not a problem

  On 09/03/2011 at 8:51 AM, DaveO74 said:

I have 700177-3 ... GT2835 56T with 84T turbine as well harey, 4" at turbo and 3" intake with black reducer. I think we have identical huffers but your dump is a little different by memory??

Im gonna run the 3" intake, my tuner (Unigroup) reckons its not a problem

Great to hear! My dump has been modified as the angle at the front pipe is different and there are lots of extra welds. My tuner is going to modify it.

Don't trust my fallable memory because it could well be 100 and 80mm .

All GT2835 Pro S turbos (AFAIK) used the -3 cartridge meaning the cropped 84 trim GT30 turbine and the 56 trim 71.1mm GT compressor wheel . I think other HKS variants used smaller trim compressors or the 90 trim turbine but not the Pro S one .

A .

Hey disco it appears that although Harey and I have the same turbo we have slightly different dump pipes.

Do you know anything regarding the hks dumps, as in was there a revised edition with a slight design change?

No issue stepping up the intake as long as it has a reasonable length intake pipe.

I have installed one of the early proS kits on a mates rb25 with the supplied 3-4 inch adapter and 3inch intake pipe and there was no stalling issue there. Stock bov.

I ran my 3071 rb25 with a 3-4 inch step and no bov and it never stalled.

I ran my old hks t300s low mount kit rb25 with a 3-4 inch step and a very tight type r bov that didn't open unless there was 15psi+ behind it and it never stalled.

My old gcg highflow on a high mount manifold with very short intake pipe, 3-2.5 step down and no bov stalled like a mofo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • With stone chips, you really can't just try to fill them. You really have to sand that spot to lower the edges of the chip, so that the filler will end up covering a wider patch than just the chip. Otherwise, you're trying to have a sharp edged paint surface match up to some filler, and they just do not sand the same and you always end up with a noticable transition. A bunch of adjacent chips should be well sanded back, to round off all those edges, and use a lot (in a relative sense) of filler to raise the whole area back.
    • To expand on this to help understanding... The bigger/longer the block is, the more it's going to work to sit on your far away high areas, and not touch the low stuff in the middle. When you throw the guide coat, and give it a quick go with a big block, guide coat will disappear in the high spots. If those high spots are in the correct position where the panel should be, stop sanding, and fill the low spots. However, using a small block, you "fall off" one of the high spots, and now your sanding the "side of the hill". Your little block would have been great for the stone chips, where you only use a very small amount of filler, so you're sanding and area let's say the size of a 5/10cent piece, with something that is 75*150. For the big panel, go bigger!   And now I'll go back to my "body work sucks, it takes too much patience, and I don't have it" PS, I thought your picture with coloured circles was an ultra sound... That's after my brain thought you were trying to make a dick and balls drawing...
    • Oh I probably didn't speak enough about the small sanding block for blocking large areas.  In the video about 3 minutes in, he talks about creating valleys in the panel. This is the issue with using a small sanding block for a large area, it's way too easy to create the valleys he is talking about. With a large block its much easier to create a nice flat surface.  Hard to explain but in practice you'll notice the difference straight away using the large block. 
    • Yep I guessed as much. You'll find life much easier with a large block something like this -  https://wholesalepaint.com.au/products/dura-block-long-hook-loop-sanding-block-100-eva-rubber-af4437 This is a good demo video of something like this in use -    You have turned your small rock chip holes into large low spots. You'll need to fill and block these low spots.  It's always a little hard not seeing it in person, but yes I would go ahead and lay filler over the whole area. Have a good look at the video I linked, it's a very good example of all the things you're doing. They went to bare metal, they are using guide coat, they are doing a skim coat with the filler and blocking it back. If what you're doing doesn't look like what they are doing, that's a big hint for you  
×
×
  • Create New...