Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Cut and pasted from another disco post:

700177-2 ... GT2835 52T with 84T turbine

700177-3 ... GT2835 56T with 84T turbine

700177-4 ... GT2835 56T with 90T turbine

So is the -3 the one to get for a stock RB25? What ID's does everyone else have?

I run the 4" Garrett 3076 with 3" reducer and have no issues. Now I know that the specs for the HKS are different and could do different things, but all things considered, I reckon you'll be fine with it.

I run the 4" Garrett 3076 with 3" reducer and have no issues. Now I know that the specs for the HKS are different and could do different things, but all things considered, I reckon you'll be fine with it.

Great to hear mate thanks for the first hand experience! So you run the reducer straight off the turbo then a 3" 45/90 deg bend to the afm?

Mine came with a reducer to the Intake pipe. I'm pretty sure its 4" on the turbo, definitely bigger than the intake pipe. I'll measure it on the weekend.

See thats the thing all the people on here that I have spoken to with the Pro S (joeyjoejoe, 75coupe and others) all have the 3" intake.

Are you sure the Pro S kits came with a 4" to 3" reducer at the turbo? As far as I know the Pro S kits have been discontinued and only the KAI is still made.

That would be great Fat_Tony, that would put the issue to rest.

Out of interest what results did you get from yours? Do you have a dyno sheet in the dyno thread?

No sheet. 345rwhp on 18psi. I think its a little low but my engine old and tired. Almost dead.

I have 700177-3 ... GT2835 56T with 84T turbine as well harey, 4" at turbo and 3" intake with black reducer. I think we have identical huffers but your dump is a little different by memory??

Im gonna run the 3" intake, my tuner (Unigroup) reckons its not a problem

I have 700177-3 ... GT2835 56T with 84T turbine as well harey, 4" at turbo and 3" intake with black reducer. I think we have identical huffers but your dump is a little different by memory??

Im gonna run the 3" intake, my tuner (Unigroup) reckons its not a problem

Great to hear! My dump has been modified as the angle at the front pipe is different and there are lots of extra welds. My tuner is going to modify it.

Don't trust my fallable memory because it could well be 100 and 80mm .

All GT2835 Pro S turbos (AFAIK) used the -3 cartridge meaning the cropped 84 trim GT30 turbine and the 56 trim 71.1mm GT compressor wheel . I think other HKS variants used smaller trim compressors or the 90 trim turbine but not the Pro S one .

A .

Hey disco it appears that although Harey and I have the same turbo we have slightly different dump pipes.

Do you know anything regarding the hks dumps, as in was there a revised edition with a slight design change?

No issue stepping up the intake as long as it has a reasonable length intake pipe.

I have installed one of the early proS kits on a mates rb25 with the supplied 3-4 inch adapter and 3inch intake pipe and there was no stalling issue there. Stock bov.

I ran my 3071 rb25 with a 3-4 inch step and no bov and it never stalled.

I ran my old hks t300s low mount kit rb25 with a 3-4 inch step and a very tight type r bov that didn't open unless there was 15psi+ behind it and it never stalled.

My old gcg highflow on a high mount manifold with very short intake pipe, 3-2.5 step down and no bov stalled like a mofo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Got you mate. Check your email!
    • I see you've never had to push start your own car... You could save some weight right now...
    • Sounds good.  I don't 100% understand what your getting at here. When you say, "I keep seeing YouTube videos where people have new paint and primer land on the old clearcoat that isn't even dulled down" do you mean this - there is a panel with factory paint, without any prep work, they paint the entire panel with primer, then colour then clear?  If that's what you mean, sure it will "stick" for a year, 2 years, maybe 3 years? Who knows. But at some stage it will flake off and when it does it's going to come off in huge chunks and look horrific.  Of course read your technical data sheet for your paint, but generally speaking, you can apply primer to a scuffed/prepped clear coat. Generally speaking, I wouldn't do this. I would scuff/prep the clear and then lay colour then clear. Adding the primer to these steps just adds cost and time. It will stick to the clear coat provided it has been appropriately scuffed/prepped first.  When you say, "but the new paint is landing on the old clearcoat" I am imagining someone not masking up the car and just letting overspray go wherever it wants. Surely this isn't what you mean?  So I'll assume the following scenario - there is a small scratch. The person manages to somehow fill the scratch and now has a perfectly flat surface. They then spray colour and clear over this small masked off section of the car. Is this what you mean? If this is the case, yes the new paint will eventually flake off in X number of years time.  The easy solution is to scuff/prep all of the paint that hasn't been masked off in the repair area then lay the paint.  So you want to prep the surface, lay primer, then lay filler, then lay primer, then colour, then clear?  Life seems so much simpler if you prep, fill, primer, colour then clear.  There are very few reasons to go to bare metal. Chasing rust is a good example of why you'd go to bare metal.  A simple dent, there is no way in hell I'm going to bare metal for that repair. I've got enough on my plate without creating extra work for myself lol. 
    • Hi, Got the membership renewal email but haven't acted yet.  I need to change my address first. So if somebody can email me so I can change it that would be good.    
×
×
  • Create New...