Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Interesting comments????

I hit nothing!

There is absolutely no damage to any other part of the rim, or even the old tyre. The dealer, after viewing the rim is of the opinion that there is no sign of abuse or impact to cause the crack!

Which is why they went to bat on the subject with Nissan HQ.

I picked up my car yesterday and the dealer informed me that Nissan is now wiling to pay one third of the bill which they did, but only because the dealer got stuck into them.

Being responsible for what you do is a bit like someone being pregnant, you either are, or you are not. So I guess Nissan worked out they are only one third pregnant on the issue.

On the subject of money, the reason most people end up in a strong financial position is because they always make sure not to waste money. The $2K plus for the rim (now less one third) is not the issue. It is the fact that, a large and indifferent mob like Nissan really don't give a rats about anybody. The middle management 'suck but' that made the decision to screw me on the rim no doubt has an ego directly opposite in size to his penis.

However, just so you know, I still believe the R35 GTR is without a doubt the greatest value for money performance car ever made! It is only the flakey warranty cover and the people who fail miserably to support it that are the problem. If they treat a GTR owners this bad, I have nothing but pity for the Tiida buyers.

Anyway, Guess what!!!!

I am going to the drive day for the new R35 down at Phillip Island next week and I am going to hunt down every Nissan HQ manager I can find and give it to them face to face. And being a current R35 owner, I am looking forward to sharing my experiences with any prospective R35 buyers willing to listen!

I'll let you know how it wentdevil.gif

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

This argument will never get resolved in everyone's heads...

a) here on SAU Forum

b) Nissan HQ or

c) Kym unless...

there is irrefutable evidence of metal fatique in that there wheel!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Assuming Nissan is playing chess, you Kym would need to take the next step (with $$ in hand) to gain proof from an expert in metal fatigue and using a sample of that same wheel, that Nissan is wrong. The experiment would need to be done on a different and 'undamaged' section of the wheel. Your move 'White'.

But then...

Nissan could use the legal argument that if the cracked section had supposedly sustained a hit, what's to say, another section of that wheel has been weakened as a consequence? 'Black' moves

As i said banged up R32'S with so called your inventive modifications, which basically are just a tight ass way to refurbish stock items as your not inventing anything nor do you have the trillion dollar research and development facilities doesnt make Nissan money.

once again you never cease to amaze me how little your arguments ever have to do with the actual subject.

Also your talking to me about driving cars? Dude everyone sees my cars driven out on the road, i remember you riding a bike to shows because your car is never in running order:).

lol what? ive never ridden a bike to a show, i dont even go to many car shows, only a few AJD's and the SAU day. and my 32 was my daily/work car for years, main reason it ever came off the road at any time was because it got defected, very rarely was it off the road due to breaking down. wrong person to be talking about reliability mate, my car is known to be one of if not the most reliable drift cars in SA.

what shits me is the way you think you know everything, and basically are putting words in peoples mouth. You dont know why this rim cracked, your just trying to be a hard ass by adding your 2c worth where its not wanted.

you seem more consumed in arguing my right to have an opinion, rather than arguing my opinion itself, we're not in china mate.

The OP clearly stated he hasnt hit a pothole UNTILL he or we find out different shut your mouth, and go waste your time on using a jack to see how flexible a wheel is.

im sorry, but how the hell does nissan know that? you expect every car and wheel manufacturer to just willy nilly replace wheels when they come in damaged, just because the user says "yeh i didnt hit anything"

A simple Xray would surely rule in or out an impact, would it not?

I don't think a metal xray is terribly expensive.

Well a macro pic > X-Ray would be the cheapest option Vs Stress test using a press.

Yeah I agree.

First time that I have posted on the Forum but after reading this post it brought back a lot of memory's.

I have owned numerous European cars over the years and find there approach to assist the customer with problems within and outside the warranty period of a much higher sympathetic level.

I had a Oz R35 for 1 year which I purchased of the same dealer on the gold coast and found them to be a good quality dealer and always helpful to the best of their ability.

I had placed a $5k depoist on the new model with Max a few months ago but pulled out when I had the same frustration with Nissan H.O over a cut and dry Warranty Problem.

Whilst I enjoyed the R35 experience I will never ever go back to Nissan again regardless of how fast a car they make.

My suggestion is write directly to the CEO of Australia.

In most situations the people that make these sort of decisions are mid line managers who believe saving their company money is the right thing to do.

CEO's generally can see the bigger picture and have a more favorable opinion.

It worked for me..but they still lost a customer for life.

Great Car..Micra Thinking.

Edited by Gazza1

I had placed a $5k depoist on the new model with Max a few months ago but pulled out when I had the same frustration with Nissan H.O over a cut and dry Warranty Problem.

Be interesting for you to expand on this. Clearly it's not as clear cut as you make it out to be as Nissan said no.

Be interesting for you to expand on this. Clearly it's not as clear cut as you make it out to be as Nissan said no.

I went through the same thing that Kymbo is dealing with ..no no no from Nissan.

It was resolved at the end by sending written communication to Nissan HQ as I mentioned.

I suffered 5 weeks of contempt and refusal prior to the above.I was made to feel the guilty party.

This was the straw that broke the camels back.

Just prior to the above issue I had placed a deposit for the new model.

Ironically I still received a invitation to Phillip Island for the new launch

btw, just in case people forgot, you paid 150k for a car with 500k performance.

Not sure what your point is though. You'd still expect "$150K treatment". I'm sure C63 and M3 owners expect better after sales service than what you'd get if you purchased a Tiida.

Edited by fungoolie

I actually work for nissan, and if they have had it at nissan head office and have had one of there engineerers inspect this and it gets knocked back, theres obviously a reason why. We have had about 2/3 new 370z wheels crack around the spokes, and these always get replaced under warranty (as its a pretty common issue). I really dont think too many people have cracked r35 wheels at all. I can raise the issue for you if you like with nissans technicle forum, and maybe even ask the engineers themselves. But believe me, if they knocked it back, they have pure cut evidence this is not a manufacturing defect!

I actually work for nissan, and if they have had it at nissan head office and have had one of there engineerers inspect this and it gets knocked back, theres obviously a reason why. We have had about 2/3 new 370z wheels crack around the spokes, and these always get replaced under warranty (as its a pretty common issue). I really dont think too many people have cracked r35 wheels at all. I can raise the issue for you if you like with nissans technicle forum, and maybe even ask the engineers themselves. But believe me, if they knocked it back, they have pure cut evidence this is not a manufacturing defect!

I know I'd be interested to hear what they say.

As it stands it's "ZOMG, I never hit nothin'!" bloke who drives a $150k car on tyres till they are belts and in 11,000ks of driving knows, 100%, he never hit a pothole and who apparently watched his tyre fitter for every second they were fitting his tyres vs a team of engineers who have said it's not a manufacturing defect.

While I'd be willing to bet the OP has hit something at some stage (not marks on the rim means nothing) I would still like to hear the actual reason Nissan have knocked it back. I don't think it's good enough to deny a warranty claim without providing justification and I can understand why the OP may be a little upset at that.

I actually work for nissan, and if they have had it at nissan head office and have had one of there engineerers inspect this and it gets knocked back, theres obviously a reason why. We have had about 2/3 new 370z wheels crack around the spokes, and these always get replaced under warranty (as its a pretty common issue). I really dont think too many people have cracked r35 wheels at all. I can raise the issue for you if you like with nissans technicle forum, and maybe even ask the engineers themselves. But believe me, if they knocked it back, they have pure cut evidence this is not a manufacturing defect!

Hi Mark

My dealer is in QLD and only sent some pics to Melbourne HQ who based their decision on that, then knocked back the claim.

The wheel is at home in a box. When I get a chance I am dropping it in to a local engineer who can provide a proper analysis. It is simply the principle of the thing, I can not stand being ripped off!!!

I think part of the issue is that, Nissan have accepted part liability in the fact that, they paid for one third of the replacement cost instead of the whole amount.

So, what are they saying with that??????????

Bottom line is, they have never before dealt in the higher end value prestige/sports car market and it shows big time!

That is why many GTR owners will only ever be one time buyers. The attitude and customer service experiences offered by BMW, Mercedes or Audi etc, etc, by comparison to Nissan, is SO incredibly different!!!!!.

Such a shame!

Everyone arguing that it must have hit a pothole needs to stand back a little and realize these cars are on run flats!

By their very nature they are different to what many folks have experienced in the past with bruised or cracked wheels.

Fact: I crewed for a 35 in a rally that did several kilometers over very rough roads on a completely flat tyre without any rim damage whatsoever.

I actually work for nissan, and if they have had it at nissan head office and have had one of there engineerers inspect this and it gets knocked back, theres obviously a reason why. We have had about 2/3 new 370z wheels crack around the spokes, and these always get replaced under warranty (as its a pretty common issue). I really dont think too many people have cracked r35 wheels at all. I can raise the issue for you if you like with nissans technicle forum, and maybe even ask the engineers themselves. But believe me, if they knocked it back, they have pure cut evidence this is not a manufacturing defect!

If I'm reading this correctly Mark, that's a damn lot of 370Z rims!!!! :w00t:

Kymbo, we'd like to have an update on your engineer's analytical diagnosis/report! Umm... perhaps after Nissan has perused it I guess. :yes:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...