Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Pathetic... I cant believe the people of NSW are just gonna cop this... Are we so "Civilized" that we just ask for more and more dick in the ass from the government and the RTA?

I dont understand how the people of australia can allow there government get away with so much? Like really getting a fine for going 61? Who the f**k notices there at 61? Let alone see it? You could be seeing the needle on 60 but your going 61...

And this whole this with 2000+ mobile camera's HOW the f**k do we just put up with this? THERE is no f**king proof they work for f**k sake because if no one notices the signs they dont slow down for that brief period of road.. Because honestly come now guys i see people see "Oops camera slow down"" Then once there pass ZOOOOOM they go in there super fast family carriers.. Its funny how the government can feed us so much bullshit media and entertainment that we dont even bother rise up when there clearly f**king us in the ass over and over...

End rant..

Sid

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358645-bang/page/3/#findComment-5731635
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, I said there were going to be 2000+ mobile speed camera sites, not 2000+ mobile speed cameras. The justification for their introduction was to monitor traffic "red spots" only, which numbered around 140. Now that they have been introduced under that pretense the RTA wants to increase the sites by a couple of thousand, no biggie......:unsure:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358645-bang/page/3/#findComment-5731774
Share on other sites

oh, so you mean the average driver DOESN'T calibrate their speedo on a weekly basis after they pump up their tyres while abiding by the designated speed limit at all times? :O

Unless your speedo starts eating the gear drive, you don't need to calibrate them, this is why they have to be between 0 and 10% over read at any time for any configuration of tyre approved by the manufacturer.

Most cars over read by at least 3% on brand new tyres. Oh and new to worn out tyres will alter reading by approx 0.5%...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358645-bang/page/3/#findComment-5732091
Share on other sites

What's the bet this one gets settled, with a confidentiality clause, way before September.

http://www.heraldsun...x-1226018034109

Constable Pitman's court transcripts should still be obtainable through FOIA.

She certainly seems to have a case.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358645-bang/page/3/#findComment-5732470
Share on other sites

This, is, horse s***.

How the hell do they intend to keep this in? 1kph? How long does it take the average car to accelerate 1kph over the limit without the driver intending or noticing? 1,2 seconds? More, less? Even factory and after-market cruise controllers sometimes struggle to regulate your speed within 3kph. Do they honestly believe a driver should be checking their speedo LITERALLY every second?

How the F*** is that logical or safe? A slight decline in the road over 2 or 3 seconds could do this. For those whose speedos read within 1 or 2kph lower, and DON'T intentionally speed, you're all about to get f***** hard...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358645-bang/page/3/#findComment-5732479
Share on other sites

SMH states that the ADRs specify a 10% margin for error either way, yet the actual ADRs say that the margin for error only applies that the car is always going equal to or less than the speed displayed on the speedo...

I wonder what else in that article is incorrect?

TL;DR - Sensationalist journalism

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358645-bang/page/3/#findComment-5733410
Share on other sites

Two words: GHOST PLATES.

Cameras won't be an issue anymore with a pair of those things on your car.

lulz

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/61870-ghost-plates-ghostplatescomau/page__view__findpost__p__1167458

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358645-bang/page/3/#findComment-5733487
Share on other sites

Two words: GHOST PLATES.

Cameras won't be an issue anymore with a pair of those things on your car.

^ ^ ^ Read Craig's post #22 HOT_R33

Familiar? :rofl:

".....he drives a holden"

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358645-bang/page/3/#findComment-5733504
Share on other sites

The new ADR rules of +10% only applies to new cars complied as new cars.

It doesn't apply to any older cars, it doesn't apply to used imports, a car may be tested to have a speedo 3% higher than actual speed when new, give it 10 years and the speedo can go either way, no matter if the car is a Hyundai or an R35. Digital speedos arn't any better either.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/358645-bang/page/3/#findComment-5733652
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...