Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys I recently bought myself a r32 gtr with some mods already done to it such as 550cc injectors, full 3 inch exhaust, hks induction kit, boost controller and some other stuff.

it's got stock ceramic turbo's but has been dyno-ed and mapped by RisingSunPerformance (14,5psi) 408,3 HP @ 1 bar of boost

Considering it's going to be used for track days, I dont think the ceramic turbine will last long at 1 bar of boost, so I'm thinking about rebuilding it with steel internals.

But do I need a remap again if I want to run 1,2 bar of boost?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/360474-remap-after-boost-increase/
Share on other sites

I just got the car 2 days ago, I got lots of paperwork including receipt from RSP

anyway here it is

j6llk6.jpg

speclist far as I know

HKS mushroom filters

Toad alarm system

Nismo lower strutbrace

Poly bushed upper mounts

Rising Sun Performance custom chip

Bilstein dampers

splitfire coilpacks

Denso purple top 550cc injectors

steel braided brake hoses

engine brace

Greddy PRofec B spec-II boostcontroller

3 inch full exhaust

Havent checked the turbo's yet so it may be upgraded ones,

Back to the original question ...

That depends.

If you want to run much more boost, the old mapping might run out of it's load scale.

Meaning the ECU uses the last 'known' 'cell' for ignition and fuelling which might lead to knock or/and lean mixture.

Sounds quite technical .. so in your case I'd say 'yes' ... remap!

u better off getting an aftermarket ecu if u plan on further mods.. a chipped ecu will need to be re-flased each time you make significant changes..

if u handy with a spanner, take off your induction kit and see if can get a better look at the front turbo, maybe able to identify the turbo

also re: dyno graph, do u have one showing what boost was being run.. u based in the uk??

No I'm from Holland, I was told by the previous owner (from UK) the 408hp was at 1 bar of boost, and he got me another dyno read out (345hp or so) wich believed to be at .75 bar of boost.

I will take a look at the turbo's tomorrow,

as for the boost. If i find out it's just stock turbo's then I think the best way is just get them rebuilt with steel internals and not go further than 1 bar.

Always a good idea to get the ecu remapped or at least checked when you up the boost. I increased my mid range by 2psi and when I took it in the tuner said it was pinging heavily and that it was good I brought it in. $2-400 to ensure everythings ok is cheap compared to the alternatives if something goes wrong.

You can get 300KW from the stock twins, but only with a tonne of supporting mods such that you only run 1 bar at most, which isn't the case so definitely you'll want to get a proper ECU if you plan to up to 1.2, and you'll be a lot safer with what you have now with a proper map.

You can get 300KW from the stock twins, but only with a tonne of supporting mods such that you only run 1 bar at most, which isn't the case so definitely you'll want to get a proper ECU if you plan to up to 1.2, and you'll be a lot safer with what you have now with a proper map.

all the supporting mods wont change the fact stock turbo will still need more than 1bar boost to see anywhere close to 300kw.. 1.2/1.3 bar will see it coming close, hell u could up it to 1.5 bar and have it running with little more gain

A valid point,

HP and 'at the clutch' makes for big figures ... :)

On the other side, I see a lot of dyno graphs form OZ with speed in km/h on the X-Axes.

I really don't understand what this is for since I'm interested in at what rpm the engine makes

what power/boost.

Cheers from London ...

Never quite understood anyone who would tune on S_HP when it's a calculated 'guess' as to the clutch power - rather than a 'real' figure at the wheels ..

I guess it makes the owner happy, but beyond that?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...