Jump to content
SAU Community

Will My Sard 700Cc Injectors Support 400Awkw?

Marko R1

By Marko R1,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Marko R1 Grand Master

Marko R1

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I'm currently running the same SARD 700's you are while making 400awkw at 21psi. My duty cycle is sitting on 79% but that power had been made with quite a bit of mechanical tuning as well. Happy to give a full list of specs if you need. I'm running normal 98 RON so you shouldn't have to change unless you really want to go to E85 in the near future.

what percentage is considered dangerous, i.e anything over 90%? when do injectors lose efficiency?

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Piggaz
Piggaz

Yes 1600's man.

Piggaz
Piggaz

Going off my wideband they were fine (which I'm sure Brett is referring to in his post). The old wreck Sard 800's were 10 times more grumpy than the ID2000's are.

Posted Images

HYPED6 Collaborator

HYPED6

Posted
Posted

The only problem with running injectors at 100% is that you are not controlling the fuel.

The injectors will happily sit at 100% all day. So will injector drivers in ECU's

But if you are at 100% then you are at the limits of the elements with fuel control. If a condition changes, eg. 1 more psi, colder charge temp etc, there is no adjustment for this.

This is the only reason that 100% DC is not recommended.

Nee-san Grand Master

Nee-san

Posted
Posted

i used to run 1650cc on my pfc

Sorry to bug you Marko but, can I have some details, I was told that the max you can run was 1000cc or atleast with any sort of resolution ?

Piggaz Grand Master

Piggaz

Posted
Posted

Sorry to bug you Marko but, can I have some details, I was told that the max you can run was 1000cc or atleast with any sort of resolution ?

Im running ID 2000's and they are fine.....

GTRNUR Grand Master

GTRNUR

Posted
Posted (edited)

Im using 700's. Based on the scaling of my MAP sensor and running 1.6 bar with a rich 11.5:1 afr I think there is room for well over 400kw from the 700's, provided you can make that power below 8500 rpm. My calculations show that at 1.7 bar boost and at around 8000 RPM i'll be brushing up against the 100% duty limit.

My hope is that i'll achieve 450kw at the tyres with this setup, and at the most with the addition of water/methanol injection. Im using a nismo in tank pump too.

Edited by GTRNUR
Marko R1 Grand Master

Marko R1

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Im using 700's. Based on the scaling of my MAP sensor and running 1.6 bar with a rich 11.5:1 afr I think there is room for well over 400kw from the 700's, provided you can make that power below 8500 rpm. My calculations show that at 1.7 bar boost and at around 8000 RPM i'll be brushing up against the 100% duty limit.

My hope is that i'll achieve 450kw at the tyres with this setup, and at the most with the addition of water/methanol injection. Im using a nismo in tank pump too.

Well my plan is stay on pump 98 so I'm hoping I can get away with 700's.

I'm also going to run a pierburg fuel pump intank which supports 360lph, compared to the 044 which runs 200lph it is 66% more efficient.

I'm going for a clean setup :)

Not many ppl know about the pierburg apart from the odd workshop. They run them in the mercedes amg series and the bugatti veyron

Marko R1 Grand Master

Marko R1

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Course you'll get away with them.

700cc - ~700hp, that's @ factory pressures too.

I don't even see 70% duty with 370rwkw from my 700 Sards. About 65% i think is the most.

ok - i'll let crd decide when i take it to jim

Nee-san Grand Master

Nee-san

Posted
Posted

Nice well Im just going to dump some ID 1600's into my HKS rail and see how she rolls.

I was always told by a certain person that a PFC will not run over 1050CC injectors...

Awesome, thanks guys.

Marko R1 Grand Master

Marko R1

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The id1000's are almost half the price of id1600's and id2000's, 1600's and 2000's are 250each ouch...and I thought jap injectors were hefty

In my old setup I had bosch 1600's (indy blues) and they were only 90bucks each

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kapr
      What brakes on R34 GTT(Europe)

      By Kapr · Posted

      Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Kinkstaah
      What brakes on R34 GTT(Europe)

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Kapr
      What brakes on R34 GTT(Europe)

      By Kapr · Posted

      Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • niZmO_Man
      Lock up the old for sale / wtb threads.

      By niZmO_Man · Posted

      Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • Kinkstaah
      R34 Gtt Wheel Offset Advice

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...