Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wow amazing! About bloody time some one updated the "spark plug". Was actually discussing this with my mate a few months back talking about how there really havn't been any proper advancements in spark plugs for decades other than using precious metals as electrodes.

i would be concerned about the battery's ability to handle the laser ignition...

Batteries provide a huge amount of capacitance, so I cant see any obvious problem. What am i missing?

Pfft - diesels have been running without spark plugs for a century. Nothing new here.

how the hell does that compare? diesels have a compression ratio of something like 20:1 to ignite the fuel. try using that kind of compression in a petrol engine.

Batteries provide a huge amount of capacitance, so I cant see any obvious problem. What am i missing?

i have no idea about batteries, that's my problem, i'm looking forward to see what can be done about these laser ignition systems, and would they be relevant to our aging RB engines?

i have no idea about batteries, that's my problem, i'm looking forward to see what can be done about these laser ignition systems, and would they be relevant to our aging RB engines?

That's exactly what I was wondering. Surely the roll-out of this technology would require serious modification to existing vehicles? Ecu, coilpacks, for a start would probably need a change.

i would reckon its not just supplying a current, but also the timing and such, not sure how electrical signals work, but maybe, there can be a "translator" sort of thing that changes the signal for the sparkplugs to something relevant to the lasers?

i would reckon its not just supplying a current, but also the timing and such, not sure how electrical signals work, but maybe, there can be a "translator" sort of thing that changes the signal for the sparkplugs to something relevant to the lasers?

Hmmmm sounds cheap lol. It'd need a retune to take full effect of the new technology though.

Lol I guess if they lasted a lifetime though they may pay for themselves (it'll be a while before the new technology becomes that reliable)

i wonder how they'd get around the carbon build up on the lazer lens. unless it closed somehow.

Maybe like a spark plug does now - the laser could burn off any carbon.

Next step to upgrade the tech on an RB would be direct injection since that's a mature technology already. The laser stuff is a while away if it ever gets into production.

I reckon internal combustion has got a fair bit of life left in it. Either ethanol or gas (Australia has shedloads of gas. There's just been a $90 billion 20 year deal signed with China).

In regards to the battery issue...BMW and M-Benz have been pushing for 48Volt sytems for a few years now.

They say they have gone as far as they can using 12 volt

these cars have elec brakes/steering/throttle/suspention & 11ty diffent computers etc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...