Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Too many variables, eg.

* If a car with standard power hits the rev limiter in top gear (unlikely) then you can quadruple the horsepower, it will get there quicker, but will still not go any faster, because the motor is turning the same gearing as fast as it can.

* If we take the same car and with all of the engine work decide to rev it 1000rpm harder, so increase the rev limiter, it will go faster, but not because of the horsepower

* If the car however does not have the grunt to turn top gear to the limiter then more horsepower will make it faster.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5805618
Share on other sites

I thought so, explains why Monaros are so slow!

my dad used to race his HG monaro (308 gts) @ ravenswood raceway back in the day....his fastest time was a 13.2, mildly worked making about 325rwhp....was running a 4.11 diff ratio.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5805969
Share on other sites

my dad used to race his HG monaro (308 gts) @ ravenswood raceway back in the day....his fastest time was a 13.2, mildly worked making about 325rwhp....was running a 4.11 diff ratio.

haha. Mine had a HJ Monaro with a well worked 308 but 3.08s in the rear was good for 14sec. But fully loaded with a trailer would sit on 160km happy to do 200 fully loaded with no trailer

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5805977
Share on other sites

haha. Mine had a HJ Monaro with a well worked 308 but 3.08s in the rear was good for 14sec. But fully loaded with a trailer would sit on 160km happy to do 200 fully loaded with no trailer

nice

my brothers 308 hg gts is running about 350rwhp and that ran a 12.9sec with slightly taller ratio than the 4.11

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5806011
Share on other sites

will a car acheive higher top end speeds with power alone or does gearing need to be changed to go faster..

Power:weight ratio determines low-speed acceleration (for a certain set of gear ratios).

Power:drag determines high speed acceleration/top speed (for a certain set of gear ratios). At a certain point wind resistance becomes so high that it relegates inertia due to mass to a relatively negligible amount when determining the maximums.

Speed is a factor of engine speed and gear ratio (in the gearbox and final drive) so the amount of power you're making does not have a direct relationship.

As others have said, if you're hitting the rev limiter in top gear with your existing power, all that adding more power is going to do is mean you will get to that speed in a shorter time.

However, if with your existing power you're not able to rev out top gear (which will be due to drag) then adding more power will increase your top speed. Of course, if adding more power meant increasing drag (say if you needed to open up the front of the car to get more air onto your heat exchangers) then your gains might not be as high as you'd first think.

One this topic, will shorter gearing give you faster acceleration, or will both cars accelerate at a similar pace? What's the advantage of short gears?

Shorter gears may give you faster acceleration. It depends on the situation. Shorter gearing will give you better acceleration in a certain gear, but note that your ground speed in that gear at a certain RPM will be lower. Whether its worth it or not is up to the conditions.

As an example, with the stock 3.5 FD in my car I'd be able to hold 3rd gear all the way around Wakefield after the main straight. With my new 3.9 I keep having to grab 4th and use about half its rev band (and then back into 3rd for some corners). Every time you change gear you decelerate while your engine is disconnected from your wheels, as drag and parasitic loss still act upon your car. Those extra gearchanges have actually cost me laptimes (both in terms of outright time and consistency) at Wakefield Park.

By the same token, at Eastern Creek where I was constantly making 3rd-4th interchanges. I should be able to avoid using 3rd so much now, and getting rid of those gearchanges should mean that I'm quicker at EC (I can't wait to get out there and find out, my Wakefield experiences have gotten me a bit annoyed at this FD).

My car also used to top out 4th gear at the end of the quarter. I'd pretty much hit the cutout just after crossing the line. With the shorter FD I'd now have to grab 5th. It's hard to say whether the extra in-gear acceleration is worth the trade-off on having to make the extra shift (and being more likely to wheelspin out the hole) but I'm suspecting I'm now a fraction slower.

Note that I've got a pretty close ratio box stock. On a car with long ratios, like Falcodores, shortening the FD is probably a good thing for acceleration in most circumstances.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5806036
Share on other sites

when talking top speed it isn't just about gearing. taller gearing can actually lower the top speed. i think it was the VR HSV GTS that had a top speed of 250kmh in 5th gear and only 217kmh in 6th because the gearing was too tall to overcome the wind resistance. very few cars on the road will actually hit the rev limiter in top gear in stock form. a lot would actually have higher top speeds with fractionally shorter gearing, but car companies don't worry about this sort of thing as they aim for top gear to rev in a nice fat torque range on the highway to give good fuel economy as well as stop you having to drop down gears at the slightest incline. top speed is all about overcoming air resistance and the faster you go the more it takes to go that little bit faster.

as for shorter gearing increasing acceleration, the short answer is yes. this is why first gear accelerates faster than 5th gear. a commodore or falcon with a shorter diff ratio will be much faster than a stock one in a drag race. first gear in an auto commodore (older 4 speed autos) is nearly the same as second gear in a manual skyline (once diff ratios are taken into account).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5807026
Share on other sites

The first reply to the thread nailed it. Marc's post there has some pretty good information too.

It all depends on what you're aiming for. You set a goal, then you change all the variables to shoot for that goal. If I want to drag people to 100km/h I'll use the standard 4.11 diff in my Skyline because 2nd gear tops out around that and if it was any shorter I'd need another gear change, which will cost me time. If we're dragging to 80km/h I'll put a 4.36 in the car, because even though 2nd gear will now top out around 90-95, I only need 80 of that and the shorter ratio will give slightly better acceleration.

If you calculate it, a standard R33 GTS-T has the gearing to achieve ~277km/h (forget the exact figure). Realistically you'll only get to around 250 because you'll run out of torque. Shorten the diff a bit and you might get 255 thanks to the extra torque of the gearing. Shorten it too much and you'll only get 230 because your car will redline in top gear at this speed. Make it too tall (say 2.5:1) and you'll have a theoretical top speed of 400km/h+ with only enough torque to get to 160-170. But 1000hp behind that ratio and you'll propel the car to around 320. There are lots of variables to it all.

All hypotheticals for the purpose of examples^

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5807229
Share on other sites

the wind resistance. very few cars on the road will actually hit the rev limiter in top gear in stock form. a lot would actually have higher top speeds with fractionally shorter gearing, but car companies don't worry about this sort of thing as they aim for top gear to rev in a nice fat torque range on the highway to give good fuel economy as well as stop you having to drop down gears at the slightest incline. top speed is all about overcoming air resistance and the faster you go the more it takes to go that little bit faster.

as for shorter gearing increasing acceleration, the short answer is yes. this is why first gear accelerates faster than 5th gear. a commodore or falcon with a shorter diff ratio will be much faster than a stock one in a drag race. first gear in an auto commodore (older 4 speed autos) is nearly the same as second gear in a manual skyline (once diff ratios are taken into account).

I never thought that I would change my opinion again, but your argument moved me in way that I've never known.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5807415
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...