Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • 5 weeks later...

Umm, I know I'm a bit Jonny-come-lately, but, which wire is it that people are cutting/switching? Sounds like something I need to do.:thumbsup:

Yeah Andy, you do! Everyone with a M35 should do this. Then crossing a busy road won't require such a big gap.

It's pin 55 on the ECU, but run it via a switch so you can "cut" the wire at will (& reconnect it also). If the ECU doesn't see the brake switch every so often (days normally) it will eventually throw a code. Good news is the code disappears if you switch the wire back into circuit & put your foot on the brake.

For more info have a read of this thread from about here (or even a few pages before -it's very interesting): http://www.skylinesa...ost__p__5832870

Edited by Commsman
  • 1 month later...

I found out today, after months driving with the wire cut, it will eventually go into throttle limp. I was driving when I suddenly noticed the throttle wouldn't go past 24% on the informeter. A quick roadside ecu reset didn't clear it, unplugging the ecu did as I couldn't get to the wires.

I have a switch in the dash now... :)

  • 3 months later...

>_< I'm getting DTC 1805. In theory once you flick the switch and press the brake does it go away? Or do you need to clear the code?

If its like other error codes Ive experienced in the M35 (eg dead AFM) the code wont clear automatically when the problem is resolved (ie plug the new AFM in and its still showing you a CEL - but the car is operating fine). If its no longer in limp mode, I would suggest that it will self clear over the next couple of days; but if you're feeling pedantic you can clear the codes manually thumbsup.gif

Funny thing is that I haven't noticed a drop in power, although I wasn't giving it much this morning. Better take it for a drive at lunch and see what's up.

If the limp mode caused by the wire cut is the same as the one with a blown AFM you'd definitely notice, even when not giving it much. Basically theres a ~2100 RPM rev limiter in place and it bounces off that once when you try and move your foot much more than 1/4" on the pedal.

If the limp mode caused by the wire cut is the same as the one with a blown AFM you'd definitely notice, even when not giving it much. Basically theres a ~2100 RPM rev limiter in place and it bounces off that once when you try and move your foot much more than 1/4" on the pedal.

Pure weirdness then. I'm sure it's 1805 but I would have revved it higher than 2100 RPM this morning. I know I was tired this morning but surely not that much! :rolleyes:

If its the wire cut you just have to reconnect the wire and press the brake, you will be good for another few months. If you leave it the car will go into limp mode eventually and limit the throttle.

If its the wire cut you just have to reconnect the wire and press the brake, you will be good for another few months. If you leave it the car will go into limp mode eventually and limit the throttle.

I just read Andys first post in this thread, he suggested that the limp mode imposed was that "Under hard acceleration = reduced response" which is a bit different to the rev limited limp mode. So, given how tired you were Jase you mightnt have noticed :P but as Scotty said - flick that switch you put in and see if it seems normal now?

I just read Andys first post in this thread, he suggested that the limp mode imposed was that "Under hard acceleration = reduced response" which is a bit different to the rev limited limp mode. So, given how tired you were Jase you mightnt have noticed :P but as Scotty said - flick that switch you put in and see if it seems normal now?

The above could be true as in my experience when the light came on (from the brake wire cut) I didn't notice any drop in performance or rev limit being imposed, but I also wasn't doing anything considered 'hard acceleration'. As for resetting the code, for me it was as simple as flicking the switch back to normal & pressing the brake pedal. Maybe it is different if the MIL has been on for a long time.... Also, I don't know how Scotty got a months driving between resetting. I got about 500km before my light came on.

Edit: just thinking about this - it's probably because Scotty has a light on permanently due to the Emanage. He is probably talking about a proper limp mode, which is quite on the cards if left for an extended period.

Edited by Commsman

^lol.

It's just 12V that needs to be applied to the ECU pin to clear the code. Can get it from anywhere. Of course if you don't use the original brake wire & switch in some permanent 12V, you'll have restricted throttle all the time.

I'm starting to think of a good idea for a "valet mode"....:whistling:

Yeah I get coming on around every 500km. Ive never noticed any difference, but its usually when im just cruising along so just press the brake slightly with my left foot while holding the button and the light goes out after a couple of seconds

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...