Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The storey I get is that all turbo RB25s and 26's have the same size and shape chambers and valve head diameters as well . A look around in aftermarket valve circles will tell the storey here if not in factory WSMs .

You could also look around for std reeplacement R33 and R34 RB25 pistons to see if the crown height/style/dish volume is the same .

I tend to think the six throttles and twinned turbos give a std RB26 lower restriction gas paths at high revs .

People should think of compression as dynamic rather than static and I think in many cases the 26's would be higher dynamic once the throttles opened up more than a tad .

I think the main difference between std 26s and Neo 25s is that the Neo would make better part throttle torque because its not intended to be a power at revs engine like 26s were intended to be .

I think valve train wise hydraulic cam followers , buckets if you like , are going to be significantly heavier than plain buckets , "solids" , so less valve train innertia for the valve springs to have to control .

Hydraulic buckets are all about no maintenance because they self adjust enough under normal operating conditions .

It is a major and expensive PITA to have to reset clearences on an under bucket shim engine like an RB26 or FJ20 .

Belt off pulleys and cams out to remove the buckets so you can get at the shims .

It always made me wonder why people ran single throttle and single turbo RB26s particularly if it was in a RWD car , if they changed pistons rods and cams then about the only minor differences are the stroke and slight port differences . Some might argue that a 26 block is a bit stiffer but how many people break blocks in a RWD car ?

The jury is still out about twin scroll single and parallel twin turbos so IMO probably the best thing 26s had was the six throttle inlet system and possibly the water riser/log system .

If you can live without these then a Neo should be cheaper to buy and still have the non hydraulic bucket valve train .

A .

So how do the AWD block RB25s neo and non neo differ from the RB26? Many of the Stagea blocks I've seen have interchangeable sump and sump parts with the Rb26.

Edited by WHITE gtt

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...