Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah dude, if you're going to make a technical statement online. You'd better have your MOFO scientific calculator and text books on hand !

Nah, I'm sorry about the technical rant, just wanted an excuse to draw a pretty picture

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/368395-m35-2jz/page/3/#findComment-5880966
Share on other sites

*sigh*

Obviously a generic form that they fill out.

Just so as we are clear, in no way am I advocating that I would prefer a "Rotah" over a "Motah" (lol), but I feel you guys needed to understand that not all rotors are without torque.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/368395-m35-2jz/page/3/#findComment-5881150
Share on other sites

Was gonna say...4L displacement and only puts out ~200kw...:sick:

yeah by RTA regulations its classed as a 4Ltr and as we all know jap cars are all restricted to the 206Kw so that doesnt really mean anything either in terms of how good an engine is and what its capable of..........

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/368395-m35-2jz/page/3/#findComment-5881271
Share on other sites

yeah by RTA regulations its classed as a 4Ltr and as we all know jap cars are all restricted to the 206Kw so that doesnt really mean anything either in terms of how good an engine is and what its capable of..........

Ahh yeah just read up on the engine classing on Wiki...makes sense now...:blush:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/368395-m35-2jz/page/3/#findComment-5881298
Share on other sites

How many people actually think 206 is a real power figure. Lancer evo states 206 but have been stock dynod at over 300. And my stag did lose against a newish one. Isn't the 206 just a regulation in Japan so they just out that so they can avoid legalities.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/368395-m35-2jz/page/3/#findComment-5881881
Share on other sites

How many people actually think 206 is a real power figure. Lancer evo states 206 but have been stock dynod at over 300. And my stag did lose against a newish one. Isn't the 206 just a regulation in Japan so they just out that so they can avoid legalities.

Stock dynoed at 300HP but not KW.

My old Evo 8MR was 225kw stock. After mods it was close to 300KW at all 4 wheels. TBE, Profec B II ( 1.65bar), Ecu, Fuel pump ect.

I'd be interested to see the stock dyno of the VQ25det, I recon 206-210 would be pretty darn close.

Edited by ArdentEagle
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/368395-m35-2jz/page/3/#findComment-5882121
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...so a "development" here aswell The swap is "done" and car went "test drive" BUT it seems the clutch(maybe gearbox?) is a little bit sad? I bought this clutch kit https://justjap.com/products/xtreme-heavy-duty-organic-clutch-flywheel-kit-nissan-skyline-r31-r32-r33-push-type "Problem" is that the first gear is hard to put into and it seems that the clutch is not disengaged. It was not the problem with the old clutch...(or like sometime the first gear would not get as easy specialy when the fluid was cold) So? Can it be like...bad "install" or is the clutch wrong ((it should not have been) i done research to get the right one) Or is this "normal" with new clutch and needs to be break in? 
    • @Duncan I can try  and thanks i did not thought about VIN and part numbers for 33/34. @GTSBoy yeah it looks like iam gonna do that  
    • Forgot to include this but this is the mid section of my steering rack that looks like it has a thread/can be turned with that notch mentioned in the post:
    • Hey everyone, Wanted to pick some brains about this issue I'm having with rebuilding my 33 rack (PN is 49001-19U05). All of the tutorials/videos I've seen online are either R34 or S Chassis racks which seem to be pretty straightforward to disassemble but this process doesnt carry over to my rack. Few of the key differences that I've noted The pinion shaft on the other racks bolt on with 3 torx bolts: Whereas my rack bolts on with 2 allen head bolts: These changes are pretty inconsequential but the main difference is how you pull the actual rack out of the housing. The other skyline/s chassis racks can be taken out by tapping the rack out of the body with a socket and it just slides right out. I'm unable to do that with my rack because there's a hard stop at the end that doesn't let the seal/shaft be tapped out. Can also see a difference in the other end of the rack where mine has a notch that looks like you're able to use a big wrench to unthread 2 halves of the rack whereas the other racks are just kinda set in with a punch. My rack: Other racks: TLDR; Wanted to know if anyone has rebuilt this specific model of steering rack for the R33 and if there were any steps to getting it done easier or if I should just give this to a professional to get done. Sorry if this post is a bit messy, first one I've done.
    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
×
×
  • Create New...