Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've joined this forum as I've read a few threads on insurance here and where better to post a cry for help about car insurance that here right? Sorry, I don't have a skyline but my brother does.

Today I was hit from behind whilst turning left into my driveway. The 4wd behind did not slow and hit the rear right side tail lights and bumper on my commodore with her bumper bar. My car is drivable and not really that much damage, but you know with the cost of repairs, parts, panel beating etc it's going to add up. My guess is that it will cut it close to the market value of the car which is a 2000 model. All very amicable, no-one hurt, kids/babies ok. Both have comprehensive insurance. The other car was completely undamaged.

Here's my problem. We are both insured with suncorp (Qld).

According to the redbook, the market value of the car is around $3 and I'd say repairs would get close to 75% of that. So the problem is, my insurer should pay for repairs and collect from the other insurer....which is suncorp. But if it gets to 75% of market value, they'll write it off. Now if they do write it off, do I have to hand over the car?

I thought as a third party you are not obligated to have your vehicle written off and the they cannot take the vehicle off you.

Can anyone clarify if possible please?

It seems very unfair that my well maintained and serviced vehicle may be taken away and I would be $$$ out of pocket and having to buy a new car due to no fault of my own because the other driver did not slow down.

Thanks in advance for any replies.

Cheers,

Mel

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/371085-not-at-fault-drive/
Share on other sites

Soft u smart ass lol

Mel, if the repairs r the same as the market value of the car they will write it off but I'm pretty sure h can buy the car back. Only prob you'll have to get it repaired but itll be good if u know sumone and get it done cheap

I believe it's immensely harder now to get statutory write-offs re-registered, if not impossible.

http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/registration/written_off_vehicles/vehicle_owners/index.html

The exemptions are at:

http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/registration/written_off_vehicles/vehicle_owners/exemptions_wov.html

So based off it having been in an accident, I don't think you'll be able to get it registered again in NSW. Might be best to try and get salvage, and part it out?

I had my supra written of about a year ago was not my fault and was insured comprehensivly with just cars

They payed me out agreed value but becouse i.was only 2 months into my renewed insurance agreement they made me pay out the whole year of my insurance

they offered it back.to me at auction price but.i declined

dont know if this helps you

oh my friend had a 91 falcon becouse it was not worth much they gave it back to him for free and payed him out market value but he argued that the car had cost him in modifications and maintanance which got him a few hundred more ontop

ok, this is what Suncorp said. 1. If I make the claim via my insurer, the claim is against my policy. They will assess and repair if the cost of repair is less than the market value etc. If the car is a repairable write off, they pay me out, keep the car and teminate insurance keeping the premium. In this way I would be considerably out of pocket as the not at fault driver if the car is written off. I am not entitled to a hire car via my policy but I can claim a hire car against the at fault driver via my insurer which is still suncorp.

2. If the car is a repairable write off, I could take the payout then buy it back for salvage value but still lose the rego and insurance. This seems like the most expensive options as the payout might meet the cost of buyback then I'd have to pay for repairs too. Won't take this option if it is offered.

3. If the car is a repairable write off, I could ask for repairs to be done to make it road worthy if it comes in less than the market value in which case I keep the policy and the rego going but then I still have a busted up car through no fault of my own and have to pay for the rest from my own pocket.

4. Wait to see what the assessor says. If they repair it - fantastic. If they want to write it off I can cancel the claim, and submit the claim to the other insurer as a 3rd party claim....or pay for repairs and car hire myself then send the documentation/bills to the at fault drivers insurance (same company). If it looks like a repairable write off, get I can get my own quotes (and say it's not insurance so it's not stacked). If those quotes come in under the insurance quotes, submit that and tell them I want it repaired. If they still want to write it off, withdraw the claim and submit it via 3rd party's policy. That will add 2 weeks to the claim. However, you still get to keep your premium if it's written off because the claim is not against my own policy, therefore they have not fulfilled their legal obligations and have to pro-rata payout or transfer to a new title.

The offer price for a write off is negotiable. Salvage is possible via either my own policy or 3rd party. Either way they keep the car if it's written off unless I buy it back under salvage.

I have to look at the insurance certificate but apparently I looked at the wrong market value on redbook. Should be looking at caryard and private sales not wholesale which puts the value up considerably which is great. My brother (who owns a skyline ;-) says there's not enough damage to write off which is a big phew! Let's hope that it gets repaired. Guess we'll see on Monday.

Cheers for all your help. Helped to ask the right questions of the insurer and since it's all recorded these days, they can't lie. In fact the people that I spoke with were very helpful indeed going through all the options that might give me the best outcome and even to my surprise said that their offers are all negotiable. I thought that was pretty good after all the bs that my brother went through went some A**hole ran up his trucks bum when it was parked.

Cheers,

Mel

PS I'm still embarassed about the $3 car typo. I sound soooo cheap.

as long as the car is standard then you dont have an issue, i had someone reverse into me and there assessor came out and only claimed damadge was 600 when i got qoute from the guys to fix for 1000 dollars and that was the cheapest one. also i had a genuine jap brand bodykit which was worth twice the cost or repairs but they will only repair to 'standard' replacement or repair value. insurance companies are a joke. at least yours is with the same company, make sure the at fault driver has already lodged the claim and you get the claim number, otherwise no work will get done to getting your car back on the road

good luck

As far as I understand that's standard practice if you have comprehensive insurance, uless clearly stated otherwise in the policy.

Even though the accident wasn't your fault, you lodge a claim with your insurance company, they sort out your repair or in the case of a write off pay you out, and then recoupe the money from the other drivers insurance company.

Since you were not at fault it won't go against your insurance record, you won't have to pay an eccess, and it won't affect your no claim bonus.

It's just that having comprehensive means any accident goes through your policy.

Paul

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...