Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

gts4 still wont be anywhere near as good build wise as a GTR, diff driveline too

yeah but youve got the base to work with.

change engine and diffs for a start to attempting to make a gtr.

could go all out and change the type of attessa.

but the maint point is OP is silly if he wants to convert a rwd 32 to a GTR.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/372683-gtst-to-gtr/#findComment-5944347
Share on other sites

20 grand, shit you can get a clean 32 GTR for 15 these days

when you say clean you mean paint yeah?

i know this. but you better be ready to spend another 10 on maintaining the f**ker.

there is a reason a 15k GTR is 15k

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/372683-gtst-to-gtr/#findComment-5944380
Share on other sites

Thank you guys u have opened my eyes I'm just going to stick to my RWD I like going sideways more than going str8 anyway thnx again guys. Iv already ripped out the RB20 and put in a RB25 motor and box. It pushing out 211kw at the wheels. And other mods I can do to get more power out of it. I have got a Haltech ECU and I'm getting new platinum and a Slightley bigger turbo with a retune people say i will get 400hp at the wheels what are ur thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/372683-gtst-to-gtr/#findComment-5944530
Share on other sites

as bronx said, you will need bigger injectors to get that sort of power. the stockers generally max out around 240 to 250kw, as does the AFM. that said, with those you should be able to get around 400hp, but that will be th eupper limit of what the stock internals will hold and still be somewhat reliable, so don't be suprised if it goes bang not too much longer.

to the original post, for the cost of converting a gtst to a gtr you could build a stupidly quick gtst which would shit all over a lot of gtr's

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/372683-gtst-to-gtr/#findComment-5944572
Share on other sites

Thnx bois

Yes I am also getting 750 cc injectors forgot to mention that. And I also got a after market fuel pump good for 500hp the name starts with W I forgot the name. Oh this motors only till I finish building my other motor I don't know if it should be a str8 25 or 25/30 what do u boys think?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/372683-gtst-to-gtr/#findComment-5944755
Share on other sites

decent tyres and suspension and even an ecu with launch control will help a lot getting it off the line.

With the Haltech ECU u can program launch control. And iv already got pedders coil over right round the car grips ok for now.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/372683-gtst-to-gtr/#findComment-5944767
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...