Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 234
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

http://steamunpowered.eu/agreed-to-originbf3-eula-ea-may-collect-and-share-your-data/

Might change some people's minds I guess. Not that keen on d/l Origin now myself.

Edited by DivHunter

EULA don't actually hold any legal weight anywhere really, they are never tested in court because they would fail. However, their information gathering and sharing provisions are a worry.

But no longer for me, BF3 was a total waste of bandwidth. I don't pay for map packs, especially ones claiming to be new games.

Cancelled my pre-order, uninstalled BF3 + Origin.

Jacob don't be a sook you got owned at BF3 so you raged and uninstalled (comment not designed to start a flaming war just pointing out possibilities)

BF3 is a completely new game engine to BC2

Frostbite 1.0

Frostbite debuted in 2008 with Battlefield: Bad Company. It features HDR Audio, which adjusts different types of sounds' loudness and lets players hear important sounds clearly even if there are other noises being generated (for example, gunshot sounds are always louder than in-game music; the in-game music will lower in volume while shots are being fired), and Destruction 1.0, which allows the player to destroy certain objects, like walls.

Frostbite 1.5

The second version of Frostbite debuted with Battlefield 1943 in 2009. It improved on the in-game destruction capabilities with Destruction 2.0, allowing the player to destroy entire buildings instead of just walls. In 2010, DICE released Battlefield: Bad Company 2 using this version of the engine, which was the first game to bring Frostbite Engine to the Windows platform. The Windows version of the game has minor DX11 shader support; consequently, it doesn't take full advantage of the entire API. The multiplayer component of Medal of Honor also uses this version of the engine, though with limited in-game destruction capabilities.

Frostbite 2

A demonstration of quasi-realtime radiosity from the Frostbite 2 engine.

The next generation of Frostbite will debut with Battlefield 3. It will take full advantage of the DirectX 11 API and 64-bit processors,[4] with no support for DirectX 9 (nor, therefore, Windows XP).[5] It will also feature enhanced in-game destruction with Destruction 3.0, creating more refined physics than its predecessor. Additionally an important distinction on its naming is that Frostbite 2 is not called Frostbite 2.0.[6]

DICE has given several presentations on advances in their rendering technology:

source

But no longer for me, BF3 was a total waste of bandwidth. I don't pay for map packs, especially ones claiming to be new games.

Cancelled my pre-order, uninstalled BF3 + Origin.

LOL NOOB RAGE.

GG at judging it on it's beta you r tard. I thought it was a POS the first day, but it's really grown on me, and shows how far they've come since BC2 in terms of both gameplay and visuals. That said I've had to drop my voltages on my cards as well as the core clocks on them as it thrashes them as hard as Furmark, first app I've seen to do that. Kept having hard lockups until I did, and both cards sit on 63-69c!

I can't wait for the full game even more now

agree Bozo i dropped my CPU from 4.5ghz back to stock mainly due to cooling but in the game my cpu load is very high

i don't mind origin and battlelog

if you remember with BF2 if you crashed mid game you didn't receive your ranks and rewards with battlelog as soon as its awarded its on the website

Whats your battelog name Madaz? Mine's sherbert86.

Sorta considering buying a second 6950 over the next couple of months, I reckon it'll be pretty awesome to run this game on full graphics :)

I notice that my GPU sits on 100% load, 100% of the time with this game. CPU usage is about 70% average.

LOL NOOB RAGE.

GG at judging it on it's beta you r tard. I thought it was a POS the first day, but it's really grown on me, and shows how far they've come since BC2 in terms of both gameplay and visuals. That said I've had to drop my voltages on my cards as well as the core clocks on them as it thrashes them as hard as Furmark, first app I've seen to do that. Kept having hard lockups until I did, and both cards sit on 63-69c!

I can't wait for the full game even more now

If what they've regurgitated as the open beta was a closed alpha I'd let it slide.

Please enlighten us, what part of the gameplay has improved since BC2?

Also, my rage is pro.

Edited by DivHunter

Cpd - are they not allowing any more downloads?

Div Hunter - I'm not 100 percent sure what new things you are looking for, I have bc2 its ok I got bored with it a few months after getting it (the same will probably happen with bf3 also)

There seems to be a lot of emphasis put on team play I personally love the flash lights, lasers, don't like rockets but hey you can't love everything

Remember this is 1 map 1 gametype we will have coop modes also

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
    • 310mm rotors will be avilable from Australia, Japan, and probably a few other places. Nothing for the front can be put on the back.
×
×
  • Create New...