Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I put my car on the dyno at Rotomotion on Friday to get my tune checked. I was/am using an innovate wideband that is about 3 months old. Anyway there was a 5 point difference between my wideband and the one at the dyno. Mine read 12.0 to 1 at wot. The dyno read 12.5 at wot. I got my tune adjusted accordingly. Scored and extra 5 rwhp as well. Anyway just putting it out there. It would suck to melt something cos of trusting a $260 sensor/gauge.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373886-wideband-discrepency/
Share on other sites

I have tuned most of it myself over the last few months. I was still at work while the car was being tuned. I didn't get to see any logging when I picked it up so I'm pretty sure they just had a look at it and changed the bits I asked them to. I got it to 247 rwhp with the stock turbo at 12 psi and they found the extra 5 rwhp by adding 1 degree to load 16.

leaning out the tune under high load/boost wont really improve fuel economy. You want to have the AFR's there Safe rather then economical

The economy comes from your lean cruise points, so at constant 60km/h, 80km/h, 100km/h etc. Having your own wideband + tuning software makes this easy and you can get it running pretty good

My best friend used to tune my car for me and he said my car actually responded better to having a bit more fuel chucked in when boosting

[quote name='89CAL' timestamp='1313234034' post='5964918'

My best friend used to tune my car for me and he said my car actually responded better to having a bit more fuel chucked in when boosting

Flame takes up more space in the exhaust, more fuel equals more flame equals more spool, that's how antilag works. If you boost up on your cold start map you will see this very well.

When I said lean it out I only meant from the 11.5 it reads now to 12. Safe is good tho. On the subject of spooling up early its gotta be lean to get the exhaust gas hot and expanded to create more volume of gas to turn the exhaust wheel. Having the timing right for spool up is equally as important. Enough but not too much or it will run rich. Cars will have more power leaner but run a lot hotter. Then you reach a point where you lose power cos there aint enough fuel there. However that point is far beyond safe under high load. Don't go there! Running lean (16.5-1)and high timing (30-39) at light load on my car is optimal as I use bugger all fuel and have the engine ready to spool early. As soon as it spools and gets up in the revs (over about 4k) you gotta cool it off with the extra fuel. Antilag is not like spooling up in the normal rev range. You use stacks more fuel and completely different timing to achieve it. Phew... back to movies and beer :thumbsup:

You don't necessarily gain more power by running it right on the edge (12:1 or so). It was discuss not long ago that the japs run 10:1 AFR's and more timing to get just as much or more power as tuning done over here with leaner mixtures and less timing.

I think 16.5:1 is a bit lean for the lean cruise AFR's personally. But that's more up to you

If the tuner is used to using a sensor in the tail pipe he should be able to do a good job but both tuners i use will put another bung in the down pipe for their sensor if there is not a spare already, Just takes a few minutes and then its there for next time.

I have thought of running super rich and more timing but haven't tried it yet. Its a pity the weather is wet or I'd have a go today. I have found though that the amount of fuel used between 12 to 1 and 11 to 1 is very noticable. I can get around 650 ks a tank running at lean at light load and obviously heaps less on boost. I have found that anything past 16.5 to 1 the car surges, although most of the time in normal driving it is under that. 16.5 is just when my foot is still on the throttle at 60kph.

You don't necessarily gain more power by running it right on the edge (12:1 or so). It was discuss not long ago that the japs run 10:1 AFR's and more timing to get just as much or more power as tuning done over here with leaner mixtures and less timing.

I think 16.5:1 is a bit lean for the lean cruise AFR's personally. But that's more up to you

12.5 is safe on a RB... when tuned right... even seen 13's on a 500hp endurance engine so 12's is nowhere near the edge.

To the OP 0.5 is often the approx difference from dump to tailpipe depending on cat and dyno pickup design at the tip.

So Trent, do you reckon that 12.5 is fine for mine? Most of the RB dyno sheets I have seen are at 12 to 1. I figure that seeing as it is only driven on the street and isn't at wot for very long it wont get too hot. I haven't got a pyrometer so I cant really tell tho. In saying that I still have a stock turbo so I dont want to spit the exhaust wheel out just yet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
    • For race cars, this is one part where I find having the roll cage bar having gone through a hole in the floor better than the build it up on a ledge inside... The Merc I help on, the main hoop ends are marked on the car, and the jack is marked... Jack goes under a few inches and lifts one whole side of the car up... Removes that fight for long slim jacks for race car duties!   My biggest issue for the daily drivers I work on, is my jacks don't go high enough. The jacks start out on a few blocks, jack it up, then start a second jack under it on more blocks, and then I can get an axle stand under it. My axle stands are presently in use, and are nearly fully extended. The car is sitting with barely more than a cm of clearance to get the wheel off the studs! Sarah's Kluger is the same, as it has an ungodly amount of droop available in the suspension and a distinct lack of good jacking points!
    • Happy? Yep, my to do list is getting shorter and shorter. Either this light approaching is the end of the tunnel, or I'm about to be hit by a train... Ha ha ha   Also, Duncan isn't that far out of town that you need to make a multi day drive out of it. 😛
×
×
  • Create New...