Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok i have a 89 gts4 rb20det awd with gtr g/box & diff. i want to convert it to a rwd. i have the switch but i dont like the extra weight from the front diff & transfer.

so can i get a rwd sump and bolt that to my rb20. then drop the transfer and front shaft and get a rear drivershaft made up to fit, or do i need a rwd engine, box and diff?

also how much work is needed to fit a rb25 into the r32?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375628-converting-awd-to-rwd/
Share on other sites

By the way. I'm putting a 25DETNeo into my R32 and it is costing me thousands. The motor and gearbox set you back ~$3k, then there's all the sensible work to do (like timing belts, coolant hoses, and so on) and wiring changes and air con hose changes and power steering hose changes and tailshaft surgery. It all adds up, even if you do a lot of it yourself - you still need to buy or otherwise obtain a bunch of bits and pieces.

cheers

ok i have a 89 gts4 rb20det awd with gtr g/box & diff. i want to convert it to a rwd. i have the switch but i dont like the extra weight from the front diff & transfer.

so can i get a rwd sump and bolt that to my rb20. then drop the transfer and front shaft and get a rear drivershaft made up to fit, or do i need a rwd engine, box and diff?

also how much work is needed to fit a rb25 into the r32?

No, the block is a different shape because of the diff/sump, you will need a RWD block. Its going to be better and cheaper for you to buy a RB25.

block is not different. yes you can fit a RWD sump.

you can buy a RWD RB20 box and then RWD RB20 tailshaft and that should all fit fine. otherwise you can leave the transfer case there but cut the side off it and just keep your standard tailshaft (but it means sacrificing your transfer case and a bit of extra weight).

if you go this way, sell me your front GTS4 diff/pinion. I need a spare. :)

you cannot just remove the transfer case as the output from the gearbox is made to go into the transfer not to bolt onto a shaft. so that's why you need to keep the transfer but with the front drive bit cut off and the guts out of it. or just get a RWD box (it has the right output shaft).

Don't forget that if you don't have a front diff, then you don't have front driveshafts. If you don't have front driveshafts, you don't have axles for the front wheels / hubs.

Sell the GTS4, buy a GTSt if you only want RWD. Don't go destroying a perfectly good car because you made the wrong choice of car in the first place.

block is not different. yes you can fit a RWD sump.

you can buy a RWD RB20 box and then RWD RB20 tailshaft and that should all fit fine. otherwise you can leave the transfer case there but cut the side off it and just keep your standard tailshaft (but it means sacrificing your transfer case and a bit of extra weight).

if you go this way, sell me your front GTS4 diff/pinion. I need a spare. :)

you cannot just remove the transfer case as the output from the gearbox is made to go into the transfer not to bolt onto a shaft. so that's why you need to keep the transfer but with the front drive bit cut off and the guts out of it. or just get a RWD box (it has the right output shaft).

Is there a difference in the design of the r32 and r33/r34 blocks? I know i could not align my 4WD sump onto a near new r33 RWD block as they were a different shape to the 4WD block. When i rebuilt my engine i had to bore the old block out 40 thou to compensate, ended up better anyway.

EDIT: maahhh bad O.P., i thought you were wanting to keep it 4WD =/

Edited by central coast person

yeah i also realised the front cv's/axles after i posted. im not going to bother with changing it, car is quite quick for a stocker just going to keep working on it. ive got a 5 puk exedy and rear main just need the flywheel. then fmic, nistune, and carbon fibre boot then upgrade turbo and exhaust. :D thinking a hks 2530 and 5zigen 3' exhaust with no cannon.

Edited by drop2nd
  • 2 weeks later...

I've just converted my R32 GTS4 to RWD, not because I wanted to tho... I stacked my GTSt and bought a GTS4 to replace it, I could only find an auto one tho.

The engine became smokey shortly after buying it so I swapped in the engine out of the GTSt into it with a R33 GTR gearbox to convert it to manual.

Cos the blocks are different and it's my daily driver I didn't have time to adapt the 4WD sump on the GTSt engine.

The RWD engine bolts up to the 4WD box no worries, and I just disassembled the front CVs and fitted the stub axles in the hubs.

If you're worried about the extra weight of the transfer case I saw a gutted transfer case on ebay earlier today.

Good advantage of keeping the 4WD box is its much stronger and half the price to replace as an r33 gtst box.

Comparing the GTS4 to the GTSt, there is a fair bit more beef in the front and rear K frames, and they hang lower in the GTS4.

Convert or replace, its prob as much trouble either way?

just going to keep the gts4, possibly getting a rb25neo awd motor from a stag :D if not just going to trick it out with the garret version of the 2530, 6boost manifold, 5zigen 3' zorst, return flow fmic, nistune and a tune, c/f boot and some drifteks. meanwhile get a s13 and start building a drift machine.

anyone else with soem conversion stories?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...