Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Right now, I'm enjoying my camera and I'm always learning, but I can't get my head around why and when RAW vs JPG is best.

I'm wondering - When do you guys use raw images and when do you use JPG?

The quality looks, literally, exactly the same for me.

I know there are preset 'modifiers' for raw, ie: exposure, brightness, contrast etc... but you can do all of this with any JPG as well...

Help me get my head around this guys - Please!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375787-jpg-and-raw-images/
Share on other sites

If the white balance is wrong for example - that's something you can completely fix if you have the RAW.

And the amount of information stored in a RAW is truly amazing (I always shoot RAW).

If you get the exposure and white balance right you can probably just shoot JPG...

What software do you use to adjust your preset modifiers (before you check the quality)?

Edited by ZENNON

But if you over expose, raw or jpg - it is not fixable?

ie: a white t-shirt, if over exposed is just a big white thing in the shape of a t-shirt - if I make exposure darker digitally.. it just makes the whole shape of the t-shirt darker and the details within do not show..

or wrong?

Sorry didn't see your question before: I use photoshop

Edited by wilorichie

If something is completely blown out. i.e. not showing on the histogram (do some reading if your not sure what i mean, it's very useful) you'll never recover it. but if it's inside the histogram but to far to either side you can bring it back to the right exposure level.

so if a shot is under or over exposed about 3 stops you should be able to get most it looking good with a raw. with a jpg though... the camera stores less information and you're a lot more restricted in what can be recovered and exposed correctly.

So do you use RAW or JPG matt? When do you use these?

Do you always have the graph up?

I have a 4gig card... I think my card might not be big enough to always use RAW. I generally always like to use the highest quality setting because I can downgrade later, but with my 4gig, I thought I'd ask you guys what you think first.

RAW feels like it takes about 1 second longer to save/process... I feel this might get annoying.

What camera are you using again, Richie? Even on a 4gb car, you should still be able to get a few hundred shots in at least.

I personally always shoot RAW, due to the better ability to manipulate photos better in PP.

I was just playing around with the graph - very cool indeed! When you say '3 stops' what am I looking for here? That one I'm not sure on sorry.

My camera is one of the entry level canons called a 1000D - I do have a decent (Well what I would call decent) lense on there though so I do expect quality photos - But unfortunately the photographer is lacking a bit haha.

I do like the fact that RAW images could fix under or over exposure better than JPGs. Is there any other benefits that you guys know about?

I see each RAW file is 10 meg and a copy of the JPG also sits there at around 3 megs. So this 13 megs in total instead of 3 megs. Which roughly a 4gig card should hold approx 300 photos.

Nick, do you find RAW much easier to work with than the JPGs?

Thanks for your time and help guys, I really appreciate your knowledge.

My camera is one of the entry level canons called a 1000D - I do have a decent (Well what I would call decent) lense on there though so I do expect quality photos - But unfortunately the photographer is lacking a bit haha.

I do like the fact that RAW images could fix under or over exposure better than JPGs. Is there any other benefits that you guys know about?

I see each RAW file is 10 meg and a copy of the JPG also sits there at around 3 megs. So this 13 megs in total instead of 3 megs. Which roughly a 4gig card should hold approx 300 photos.

Nick, do you find RAW much easier to work with than the JPGs?

Thanks for your time and help guys, I really appreciate your knowledge.

Ahh cool, I'm familiar with the 1000D, my cousin has one and I used to have (still own, but it's on loan to another cousin) a 450D, which is one step up.

Alright, the main benefit of using RAW images is that when you modify them in any way, the original file is NEVER damaged and/or written over - the changes you make are written to a small separate file. When you modify a Jpeg file, unless you've made a copy, you'll never be able to revert back to the original photo as shot by the camera.

RAW feels like it takes about 1 second longer to save/process... I feel this might get annoying.

Oh, and with this, it helps to use faster cards (class 4 or higher) where possible if you're going to be shooting using the burst mode.

How many MP is a 1000D? 10MP? You'll be able to get around 250 Raw shots on a 4GB card. I have a 7D and use 8GB cards and i can get 270-300 Raw shots but the file sizes are around 20-30MB.

I always shoot RAW. Much easier to manipulate the file. You can do it with a JPEG but it will not be as clean and it won't take much for the file to basically "crumble".

A stop is 1 stop. E.g. F5.6 to F8 is one f stop. 1/125th to 1/250th is 1 stop etc... Google it, if you want the full stop calculations, i don't want to type them all up, will take too long lol.

RAW's advantages over JPEG is easily the manipulation. You would be surprised how much you can recover in a RAW. Although blowing out a white shirt and pulling it back 3 stops might be an extreme as it will start to lose it's dynamic range. If that is the case, i suggest you work on your exposures.

If you shoot a JPEG it will already (In-camera) adjust the sharpness, saturation, contrast etc... to whatever you have set in the camera. Whereas the RAW PREVIEW will show exactly the same thing, but once loaded into camera raw in photoshop, these will be stripped and the image will be "flat" until you adjust it to how you want.

Shoot an image 2 stops over-exposed/under-exposed as a JPEG and shoot the same thing as a RAW and you will see the difference. Try recovering them both and you'll see the difference.

Most sport shooters shoot in JPG at events so that the "card runners" can collect their cards and upload straight away to the editors etc.. 95% of pro's/most photographers will shoot in RAW. Much less destructive than JPEG editing.

IF you google RAW vs JPEG i'm sure there are over a million answers why you should shoot RAW :)

IF you google RAW vs JPEG i'm sure there are over a million answers why you should shoot RAW :)

I suppose that is funny, because before I posted this thread, of course I did a bit of Googling - And the first 3 articles I read, is why you should shoot JPG. I had decided just before that, I wanted to shoot RAW and I wanted to read an article telling me this was a good idea! Simply because it is easy to downgrade, but not possible to upgrade (Photo editing stage).

The first 3-4 posts (including yours, FST) have given me more than enough confidence that RAW is a much better decision than JPG - And I have happily made the switch :)

  • 3 weeks later...

If you don't shoot raw.... your a f**king idiot.

Ir someone who is happy with snapshots. I only shoot raw. Ditch the jpg baby.

You can only manipulate about 20% (without spending ages making actions and splitting pics apart) in jpg. Raw gives you so much more control.

You've made your mind up so I will say no more.

Except get a class 10 card. Faster writing speed. I always have a 16gb stick and its been sufficient 98% of the time.

I've just downloaded a trial of Lightroom 3. When loading NEF files, the colours go off as soon as it loads.

Seems ridiculous that you can do eleven biliion different things with the photos in LR3 , but can't stop it from buggering up colour and contrast in the original RAW files. :domokun:

Edited by Stang
  • 2 weeks later...

I discovered RAW a few months ago, and wish I knew about it earlier.

I use Lightroom for all my photo editing now, I haven't had any reasons to head back in to Photoshop to fix up or change anything.

So now, Photoshop is now a work tool, and Lightroom for fun :)

RAW saves all the information the camera captured, where as a JPG is a flat image.

Think of RAW like the raw ingredients going in to cooking, they're sitting there unprocessed and not quite ready to consume. You cook them (edit in Lightroom), and export them in to a JPG for consumption. You can still add things to the final product to make it how you like, but that's it.

If you over cook a JPG from the camera then that's it, you're stuck with that, and can't fix it up too much. (depending on how bad)

If you under cook a JPG you might be able to recover a bit more, but again that's a stretch.

But with RAW you can always go back and change it again, and again, and again!

I used to always shoot in JPG and edit in Photoshop, I made do just fine. But there was always something my fussy self would notice but I'd make do. Now that it comes to RAW, I'm so much happier with the final products!

I have a 16gig card, And I just shoot dual JPEG + RAW, basically because I'm lazy :P

If I have a photo I want to keep that looks good enough without touching, I just grab the JPEG, but then I always have the option of playing around with it in RAW. Perks of having a 16gig card, not really necessary but I find it handy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Stock ECU (or more accurately stock tune) absolutely refuses to go over 10psi and behaves like you have seen. The Nistune is the same if it is the stock tune. If the Nistune chip has been tuned, the resulting tune could be literally anything for any combination of parts. The Nistune just makes the stock ECU Tunable.
    • So stock ECU does not like anything above 10 psi?  That Nistune one is just for "try" if it will be any different, I know it need to be tune for that. I know but YOU may know about these problem but i/we dont. They few little Skylines here let alone people who know anything about tham so that is why iam asking here  
    • So now we have a radiator with no attachments whatsoever. It lifts up with a particularly tight spot between the drivers side air box mount and the lower radiator outlet, but if you've got this far you will sort that too. This is the lower mounts with the rad out so you can see where the rubber bushes go, it is a straight shot upwards Done! Assembly is the reverse of disassembly, with blood less likely to be shed.
    • Right, onto the second last trick. The Air Con condenser is mounted to the front of the radiator and stays in the car when the radiator is removed. There are 2x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the condenser to the radiator, remove those The bottom of the condenser is attached to the radiator with clips. You need to lift the condenser out of those clips and clear (up, then forward). f**ked if  could work out how to do that last bit with the front bumper on. I hope you can, and you share the trick.  Bumper removal probably deserves its own thread one day once I've recovered the will to live, but basically you need to remove the wheels, front inner guard liners (clips and 10mm headed bolts), the self tapper between the guard and the bumper at the rearmost point of the bumper (same as an R32 that bit), any remaining clips at the top/front of the grill, an absolute bastard design with a plate that holds the top of the bumper above the headlight each side (only 1 bolt which is tricky to get to, but the plate catches 2 places on the bumper and must be removed....carefully!) and push clips between the bumper and guard under the headlight. If you've done all that you will be faced with wiring for the fog lights on both sides and in ADM Q50 RS at least, 4 nasty tight plugs on the driver's side for the ADAS stuff. So, the clips at the bottom look like this on drivers side (looking from the front) And on the passenger side (also from the front), you can see this one is already out Clearance on both of these are super tight; the condenser needs to move up but the upper rad support mount prevents that, and the radiator can't move down far because it is (rubber) mounted. Once you achieve the impossible and drop the condenser off those mounts so it does not stop the rad moving, you are good to go
    • OK, next the shroud needs to come off and there are a couple of tricks. Firstly, there is a loom from near the passenger side headlight to the fans, coolant temp sensor etc and there is no plug to undo.  In my case I was OK to leave the shroud on top of the engine so I just undid the passenger side fan plug and about 10 of the clips which gave enough free wire to put it aside. The fan plugs were super tight, the trick I used was a small falt screwdriver to push down on the release tab, then a larger flat screwdriver to lever the plug out of the fan unit....be careful with how much force you apply! If you need to remove the shroud altogether for some reason you will have to deal with all the plugs (tight) and clips (brittle)....good luck. I removed all of the clips and replaced them with cable ties that I will just cut next time. Also, in the Red Sport / 400R at least, the intake heat exchanger reservoir hose is bolted to the shroud in 2 places with 10mm headed bolts; so remove them (the hose stays in the car; no need to undo it at the t fittings down at the radiator lower mount. Once you've dealt with the HX hose and the wiring loom, there are 3x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the shroud to the radiator; remove those.   The shroud then lifts out of the bottom mounts where it sits on the radiator, up and onto the engine out of the way. Simples
×
×
  • Create New...