Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Tinyest of updates from me

The 31 was off the road while i repaired a bit of rust (not 100% done because i couldn't get my hands on a mig)

Had to get some new rear tyres so was wearing stockies for a little bit

IMG_20120518_141228.jpg

Saved some penies and bought some round things for the back

IMG_20120522_162742.jpg

and some more pics of the shitter corolla

IMG_20120616_150806.jpg

IMG_20120616_150749.jpg

IMG_20120616_150817.jpg

haha, for lolz (got a few paint pens on ebay, got bored after doing the tyre writing on 1 tyre so started attacking the engine bay)

also, out of picture is the "flux capacitor"

my housemate also painted the inside of the front mudflap fluro orange :glare:

im thinking the angle grinder might make an appearance sometime, but its already a pretty dodgy car (mainly dying gearbox and super worn bushes)

WTF is that on your gearbox :):D ? Is that a "pipster ockey clutch special" or am I seeing things here....

Haha, yep

Otherwise the clutch fork comes off the pivot ball and the clutch slave goes on an angle and the pedal gets heavy sometimes

Guess the guy that did the clutch for me f**ked something up,

meh, it works I guess

Pretty dodgy tho

  • 2 weeks later...

yeam mine has the hectic black guards, and a ful sik HKS exhaust which seems to neither add power nor change the noise, just looks different.

Yours has been lowered a fair bit too I think, looks good.

Keeping the Stag as my weekender: but just put a deposit on a Toyota 86: due in December at this stage... :)

december really?? friend of mine has been on toyotas back about it. took one for a test drive on monday (which was an auto because the other person who booked in a test drive wanted auto......lame) and they told him 12 months wait time......seems a bit silly

this is pretty long gone now, but was fun while i had it

64906161.jpg

this is also gone now unfortunatly

omy20tedit2.jpg

but it made way for

CEG1CgBmkKGrHqYOKjgE0dTfBV5BNS7il8pQw_3.jpg

IMAG0132.jpg

100_7038.jpg

:D i also had a 1983 series 2 nissan bluebird with a cA18det in it, but have no photos of it, they got burned in a fire :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...