Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Specs;

0-300kmh: 14.53 seconds

300-0kmh: 6.66 seconds

0-300-0kmh: 21.19 seconds

0-200mph: 17.68 seconds

200-0mph: 7.28 seconds

0-200-0mph: 24.96 seconds

Koenigsegg is renowned for producing cars that are up there with Lamborghinis in terms of sheer unbridled power.

Indeed, less than 2 weeks ago, another model apparently battered the competition.

A statement on Koenigsegg's website read: "Today, 2 September 2011 at 12.08pm, a standard Koenigsegg Agera R took several new production car world records at the Koenigsegg proving ground in Angelholm, Sweden" and that “all results will be submitted to the Guinness Book of Records.”

These figures reflect both phenomenal acceleration and breaking performance. To give you an idea, a 1,200bhp Bugatti Veyron Supersport does 0-200mph in 22.2 seconds.

Koenigsegg also said that a short film of the record breaking efforts will appear in the coming days.

Meanwhile, you can try and figure out how the Agera R – which we think stands for ‘Ridiculously Fast and Beautiful!’ – didn’t take off on the track!

5843e52b43b257da49d9c18e0e28010f9gxeid.jpg

00ebe2233aede550b5ddfbb110618b6er8wk7b.jpg

f5ffeeef8eff61ce615eaecb03418f645f8ims.jpg

ac5e9759e26b266475f118a42f9b94c3go45y0.jpg

Source; Gumball3000

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376977-agera-r-the-king/
Share on other sites

Sounds good, but it's very close to the Koenigsegg CCXR Edition, which I prefer :)

2008-koenigsegg-ccx-edition-3-588x441.jpg

always loved the koenigseggeggeggsgsesgg over the pagani

pagani-zonda-cinque--4_460x0w.jpg

I'd still take a Pagani Zonda Cinque anyday :D

Or ultimately the Pagani Zonda R.

I love the Agera looks and performs in a class of its own. Although after going to Italy and meeting Horacio Pagani (he signed me a Pagani polo and poster) and also seeing the cinque, zonda r and uno in the flesh I am a solid Pagani fan.

There workmanship is second to none just check out there factory.

I love the Agera looks and performs in a class of its own. Although after going to Italy and meeting Horacio Pagani (he signed me a Pagani polo and poster) and also seeing the cinque, zonda r and uno in the flesh I am a solid Pagani fan.

There workmanship is second to none just check out there factory.

pics or GTFO :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...