Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

One of my mates has encountered an issue with his GTR which his tuner (as well as many of the top workshops in the eastern states) have not been able to figure out.

Lewis Built RB26

260 x 9.15 tomei cams

SARD 700cc injectors

CNC ported head

Trust T517Z's (8cm)

Haltech Pro Plugin

No O2 sensors

Walbro intank pump with 044 from external from surge tank.

The car had a few electrical gremlins that were sorted out before tuning, it then went on the dyno and was tuned and it made 360kw @ 20psi (T517Z's).

The issue came the next day when they started it it was mega rich and was pumping out thick black smoke. They adjusted the tune and pulled out 25% fuel to bring it back into line. Then as the engine warmed and it got to around 50 degrees it started to lean itself out and needed the fuel added again. They shut it down and let it cool, then started it again and it did the same thing.

They though the pump might be dying (even though it made power) so they put a fuel pressure/flow gauge on it and watch it again as the engine warmed and once again it went rich then lean but the pressure and flow were unchanged.

They then scoped the injectors to see what was happening at the injector and there was no change in the firing time with the change in AFR's. They then fitted another set of the same injectors the same thing happened, they removed the resistor and changed the impedance at the ECU there was no change, the voltage is only fluctuating by 0.1V-0.2V so it's not latency related.

They though that it might be the ECU itself even though the injector scope said that the firing time wasn't changing, so another ECU was used and it changed nothing.

The engine was previously running a Power FC L-Jetro and there was no issue with the AFR's changing themselves.

The Tuner is Simon at Morpowa and he has rang CRD, Godzilla Motorsport, and Haltech themselves and no one can think of what would cause the symptoms. Haltech have now been sent the tune to run on their simulator so see if that can shed any light but when they were trying to diagnose the fault Simon fixed all the cells used for idle to the same value to make sure that the ECU wouldn't be changing injector time, but that had no effect on the issue.

I spoke to Simon yesterday and he gave me a rundown but any specific question that he didn't give me the info for will take a day to get the answers for the thread.

Has anyone got any ideas or come across anything similar?

Edited by D_Stirls

They had played with both the ATC and WTC initially and it had no effect on the issue. But both those corrections it would have changed the injector firing time and that would have been seen on the scope.

Graph all injector values vs time and compare when it is fine and when it isn't, see if stuff like pulsewidth/latency is changing etc. This way you don't need to look for what COULD change these things, you can just look at what IS changing and then work backwards. This is assuming the ECU is powerful enough to graph random variables like pulse width etc which would never normally change.

Also get someone to look at the fuel pressure when it is fine and when it isn't making sure it doesn't change.

Ultimately it sounds like an ECU issue where one of these variables is getting reset or changing for whatever reason, either that or some weird trim/compensation map is kicking in.

Something else worth graphing is the rpm and load (whether it is afm or map) when this happens, see if the RPM signal changes dramatically or the load suddenly doubles even though it hasn't actually. Could be a faulty sensor.

Edited by Rolls

what "electrical gremlins" were "sorted out" before the tune?. using onboard map sensor in the ecu, or an external one? doyou have the full injector dead time figures (8-16v)? if not SET THEM TO ZERO. remove injector resistor. set injectors in the main set up table to the propper setting.(drop down menu explaines)

was it tuned throttle over map,afm,or just map? ve or injection time? set coolant temp correction to zero and warm up. (all this will have to be done at the dyno)

injector latency is not nessesary, all it does is add a time to each event. if it is not set correctly the thing wont evan start. (had the same issue at work with id1000's. there values were heaps differant to the default haltech ones. changed them and started first kick.

so if you dont have the exact documentation on the values, set it to zero as it will make tuning and cold starts uber hard with the varing crank voltage.

Under what conditions would it "lean itself out"? Was it only idle, or under load, or everything? Just trying to work out whether you should be trying to resolve an issue with too much fuel, or conversely - not enough air going through the engine as the conditions change for some reason.

Can you provide more details on the ecu relay? I'm having similar issues on my 33 gtst random leans outs and miss firing at idle. during the lean out i am not seeing a change in injector duty cycle

Myself and quite a few other people have found that RB's need to be fairly rich to idle properly.

But that is another matter.

If you have swapped ECU's and it is still doing the same thing than that is not the cause.

I'm also dudious that there is no change in injector pulses, have you checked the voltage at the injectors when both lean and rich?

I have basically swapped out everything apart from ECU and FPR.

I'll borrow my mates occeloscope to check injector voltage.

I suspect my issue is electrical, also suspec OPer's issue is electrical aswell.

I took my car to an auto electrician to be told nothing is wrong. I see an alternator putting out 13v and the ecu seeing 10.5v as a problem

New alternator has mostly resolved my voltage issue tho, but still seeing all these weird problems.

I will be putting in a PFC and Sard FPR as testers ASAP

Under what conditions would it "lean itself out"? Was it only idle, or under load, or everything? Just trying to work out whether you should be trying to resolve an issue with too much fuel, or conversely - not enough air going through the engine as the conditions change for some reason.

+1

Fuel presure, flow, and injector duty cycle are the same, meaning it *shouldnt* be fuel, so not enough air?

Amount of fuel to flow out of the injector is dependant on the opening time(For this purpose we will ignore injector lag times) and fuel pressure.

The more fuel pressure the more fuel will flow at the same opening time(This is also discounting changes in manifold pressure)

If you have a faulty FPR it could make the fuelling go all over the place.

That said if injectors are not getting a constant good voltage source, injector opening times will change, this will change the amount of fuel being injected but wont nessesarly change the pulsewidth's especially if the ECU is not seeing the same voltage drop

As I said you need to graph all injector values to see why it is getting more fuel. Opening time, pulse width, fuel pressure, voltage.

Fuel pressure I imagine you'll have to have someone sitting there looking at a gauge but it is better than nothing.

As I said you need to graph all injector values to see why it is getting more fuel. Opening time, pulse width, fuel pressure, voltage.

Fuel pressure I imagine you'll have to have someone sitting there looking at a gauge but it is better than nothing.

Agreed totally with this, I will be attempting this on the weekend, just need to acquire the tools or some one with the tools to do this.

As I said you need to graph all injector values to see why it is getting more fuel. Opening time, pulse width, fuel pressure, voltage.

Fuel pressure I imagine you'll have to have someone sitting there looking at a gauge but it is better than nothing.

Given the people involved, the diagnostics they have been resorting to and generally giving them credit I'd think (or hope) that its almost insulting to make these suggestions on the assumption they weren't the first points of call. It'd be very interesting to see a datalog file as the car warms up, however - if that were a possibility?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...