Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys, I was going to buy Garrett gt35r then saw this precision ceramic dual ball bearing turbo with billet compressor wheel which is rated 700hp. need 400rwkw on built rb26. Google it and there are many pros about this precision turbo. And authorized local dealer is Powertune Australia.

anyone using this precision turbo? need some advises from turbo gurus' whether should stick with GT35R or go with 6265. dont want it to be too laggy .

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/377634-gt35r-or-precision-6265-ballbearing/
Share on other sites

The precision turbos seem to be less laggy than the equivilents in garrett speak, but they want 35psi to do their thing.... It just depends on if you want to build a setup to cope with 35psi in order to make a pissy 400kw.

If you read the "who has over 400kw" thread you will see a dude with the forum name 'Fineline' who broke a lot of 35Rs making 400kw, but has since swapped it for a garrett 3788 twin scroll and is making the power much nicer now. I think it was doing it at like.... 19psi?

The twin scroll setup also made the 3788 very similar in spool to the 35R but seems to have a bucket more power available. Personally I would be chasing that.

Just built an RB26 for a guy using one of these for the first time instead of a GT35R and I can tell you it is a frickin monster! 600rwhp @26psi and equivalent response to the 35R. The biggest difference is the GT35R won't live a long and happy life at those power levels.

It get's the :thumbsup: from me

Just built an RB26 for a guy using one of these for the first time instead of a GT35R and I can tell you it is a frickin monster! 600rwhp @26psi and equivalent response to the 35R. The biggest difference is the GT35R won't live a long and happy life at those power levels.

It get's the :thumbsup: from me

Cool! What fuel?

The precision turbos seem to be less laggy than the equivilents in garrett speak, but they want 35psi to do their thing.... It just depends on if you want to build a setup to cope with 35psi in order to make a pissy 400kw.

If you read the "who has over 400kw" thread you will see a dude with the forum name 'Fineline' who broke a lot of 35Rs making 400kw, but has since swapped it for a garrett 3788 twin scroll and is making the power much nicer now. I think it was doing it at like.... 19psi?

The twin scroll setup also made the 3788 very similar in spool to the 35R but seems to have a bucket more power available. Personally I would be chasing that.

35PSI???? no way Im gonna use 6265 then. gt3788 sounds good

Edited by hkssam

He's only saying 35psi because he's exagerrating from the fact most of the PT results he'd have seen would have been from shxtty 4cyls which NEED 30+psi to get around 600whp. They do still definitely tend to have a bit of a high boost bias over the standard GT series Garretts though, more aligned to higher boost for the equivalent power levels than Garretts you'd go for to make the same power. On an RB26 I'd expect a PT6265 to be not too bad, though I'm dubious that it'd spool as good as - let alone better than a GT35R, albeit not necessarily much in it.

The ForcedPerformance HTA range are worth a look, too...

The precision turbos seem to be less laggy than the equivilents in garrett speak, but they want 35psi to do their thing.... It just depends on if you want to build a setup to cope with 35psi in order to make a pissy 400kw.

If you read the "who has over 400kw" thread you will see a dude with the forum name 'Fineline' who broke a lot of 35Rs making 400kw, but has since swapped it for a garrett 3788 twin scroll and is making the power much nicer now. I think it was doing it at like.... 19psi?

The twin scroll setup also made the 3788 very similar in spool to the 35R but seems to have a bucket more power available. Personally I would be chasing that.

So PJ's SR20 has made nearly 485rwkw on upper 30's boost, with a 6265 but on a well built RB26 on 35psi, it will only make 400rwkw..........

HKS sam, the 6262 is a closer match for the 35R if your worried about response

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Also on the same boat as you. Im finding the same kinda info. Some people have had dramas with them, where other swear by them. Seems to be big in the evo community. I think im just gonna go out an try one. Still dont know if i wanna run 6265, or the 6765 (TO4Z comparison). Also have a read through this!

http://turbodirect.co.za/site/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=709&Itemid=21

Seem to throw out alot of assumptions on where the turbo will fail, but it seems they dont fail. I know the older plain bearing ones use to. But owell i reckon its a gooer :)

He's only saying 35psi because he's exagerrating from the fact most of the PT results he'd have seen would have been from shxtty 4cyls which NEED 30+psi to get around 600whp. They do still definitely tend to have a bit of a high boost bias over the standard GT series Garretts though, more aligned to higher boost for the equivalent power levels than Garretts you'd go for to make the same power. On an RB26 I'd expect a PT6265 to be not too bad, though I'm dubious that it'd spool as good as - let alone better than a GT35R, albeit not necessarily much in it.

The ForcedPerformance HTA range are worth a look, too...

Yeah definitely not as good as a GT35R. For similar power the 3788 still shits on the 6265 for response from what I have seen. It almost traced the same boost line. Noel (Fineline) ended up making 565 on 24psi I think but it's having some wastegate problems so the boost has been tapering off to 16 and making about 520. That's on E85 though.

so what fuel did the 35r make that power on.

im also looking at a gtx 35r but i only can run pump because i live out in the sticks!

im making 470rwhp at 26psi thru a gt3582r on stock rb25det. u would crack 520+ with cams on a stock 26. on prob 22-24psi

Edited by methz
  • Like 2
Yeah definitely not as good as a GT35R. For similar power the 3788 still shits on the 6265 for response from what I have seen. It almost traced the same boost line. Noel (Fineline) ended up making 565 on 24psi I think but it's having some wastegate problems so the boost has been tapering off to 16 and making about 520. That's on E85 though.

Hey Dan isnt noel running elfex? I though it had a lower ocatance rating compare to straight sucrogen e85?

GT3582Rs don't like being pushed too hard because they have big frame/shaft sized wheels in a small frame/shaft sized cartridge . Garrett do make large frame ball bearing GT3576R and GT3582Rs as OE diesel spec turbos for Hino Isuzu etc but I'm not sure if the 6 year exclusive rights thing is up yet and they use larger GT40 family housings both sides - and the larger T4 International sized mounting flange .

As has been mentioned the large framed GT37BBs are probably good things for high outputs and you can look at them as a slightly smaller brother to the GT4088R .

With the BB37s you have three compressor options and from memory the mid sized one uses the same 82mm 56T wheel as the GT3582R , only this time the cartridge is larger longer with a bigger shaft and bearing section . Also from memory these larger frame units use a threaded bore compressor wheel rather than a plain bore and jamb nut .

The big frame units are beefier all round and pretty much push you towards that larger T4I flange and preferably twin scroll turbine housings .

Some even have twin integral wastegates , cheers A .

I dont have an ideal setup, so take this post with a grain of salt, but I've got a 6262 journal bearing with a .58 T4 rear on my RB30. Boost doesnt come on until ~3600. And then power is dropping off around 5500 due to the rear end. With a rear end that small, I was expecting something a whole lot more responsive. I'm not even going to bother with a different turbine housing, I'm ditching it in favour of a GT35R or GT30R.

I dont have an ideal setup, so take this post with a grain of salt, but I've got a 6262 journal bearing with a .58 T4 rear on my RB30. Boost doesnt come on until ~3600. And then power is dropping off around 5500 due to the rear end. With a rear end that small, I was expecting something a whole lot more responsive. I'm not even going to bother with a different turbine housing, I'm ditching it in favour of a GT35R or GT30R.

what sort of figures did it make?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah I suspect even if you hold airmass per cycle/cylinder constant if you get too far away from stock you're still going to have problems running the factory tune within the bounds of the factory load scale. Cams, different displacement/rod ratio, etc. I'm just lucky that the GTIII-SS with wastegate boost + CA compliance cats is pretty much equivalent to stock turbos. When I have actual space I can finally get it tuned and modify the fuel system for flex fuel to 100% handle any detonation concerns when cranking the boost to whatever those dinky turbos can put out.
    • I would say no, why, because my daughter, who also lives in Goulburn, hasn't recommended us going there Pity, as we miss all the German joints around in Sydney, actually, the restaurants are the only thing I really miss about Sydney, and a special mention to Ishibanboshi at Bondi Junction, their Kara-age Don is heart cloggingly deliciousness (always added a special boiled egg...or 2) 😋 
    • Does that German restaurant still exist in the old place out the NW end of Goulburn? When I say "out the NW end of"...I am really being vague. It was 1997 when I was last there, and the only point of reference I can recall is that it was on the opposite side of the main drag from the big merino. And when I say "opposite side of the main drag", I don't mean "on the main drag". It was either a couple of streets back from there, or might have even been out in the sticks a bit further. Was an old farm building or mill or somesuch. And when I say "the big merino" I might actually be thinking of a completely different part of town, because I just looked on maps and the big bugger is not where I remembered him to be! The food was good, consisting largely of various German mystery-meat sausage/loaf things and kartofflen.
    • So while the second sentence is completely correct and the whole point of the conversation, the first sentence bears consideration. If this bloke is just hoping to throw big turbos on and drive it around, because there are no helpful facilities at all in his tropical paradise** then he likely has zero chance of even knowing what the TP is on the last column in the stock maps, let alone know whether the ECU is operating anywhere near it or past it. So the point is very very moot. And, per what I said before, at stock boost on those turbos, you may well be off the end of the map. **I'm just back from Vanuatu, so I know exactly what small Pacific nations can be like wrt paradise without requisite facilities. But it's not even that simple. I put a high flow on my car and had to drive it around without a proper tune because of the lack of opportunity*** to put the bigger AFM and injectors into it to allow it to be tuned. I had to turn the boost down to less than I had before, and back off the boost controller's ramp, because it was exploring parts of the map that it didn't drive in before, and really couldn't access for tuning on the dyno either, and so was pinging. It was still well within the last column, because when I first**** set up the Nistune on the Neo I rescaled all axes of the maps to give some more space to explore. ***Family dyno was broken ****This was 13 years ago, and the TIM thing wasn't a thing then and so TP would definitely grow when pushing past the stock tune's limits.
    • Yep, this bit another local owner. I caught it before putting the transmission back into the car, what I noticed was the pressure plate fingers weren't flat and even. It's more obvious with the pull style clutch because the throwout bearing ring was visibly not flat once everything is put together. Nismo should really update their instructions to call out this specific detail. I'm not even sure the clutch as-shipped orients everything properly.
×
×
  • Create New...