Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys i have just bought an r33 gts-t. its got a pod exhaust and bov aprt rom that its stock as a rock how much boost can i run with a stock turbo??

also i read you dont have to piggy back the ECU if you change the spark plug gap from 1.1mm to 0.8 has any one tried this out?

any advice would be good i want to get it quicker with out spending a mint.

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/379078-where-to-go-from-stock/
Share on other sites

The stock turbo is generally a risk to say the least, a good flogging at high boost could blow it and it might take the motor with it. Stick to 9 or 10psi tops.

As for working it without spending a mint, you will need to spend about 3 grand to get a highflow, front mount and a remap.

Goodluck.

Hi guys i have just bought an r33 gts-t. its got a pod exhaust and bov aprt rom that its stock as a rock how much boost can i run with a stock turbo??

also i read you dont have to piggy back the ECU if you change the spark plug gap from 1.1mm to 0.8 has any one tried this out?

any advice would be good i want to get it quicker with out spending a mint.

cheers

I think you mean how much boost can the stock turbo run before blowing up. Mine has seen 20 psi a few times, 18 psi a few times, 16 psi quite a few times, 14 psi for ten months. It started leaking oil after ten months. Others haven't had my luck and their turbo has died rather quickly on far less boost.

As far as gapping the plugs go I'd say that almost everyone on this site has done it. Like GTScotT said you can get your turbo high flowed for around a grand, you can get a front mount from ebay with a pipe kit for $500 then put it in yourself, buy a second hand power fc and hand controller for a grand and get it tuned for around $500. On 12 psi this setup will net you around 190 rwkw. This will pretty much max out your injectors and your afm. So there is your $3000.

Then you spend another $500 on some refurbished injectors, $300 on a new z32 afm and a couple of hundred on a fuel pump and you'll be looking at closer to 250rwkw.

Or if you are like some others here you go out and spend $4.5k on a turbo setup that will rip you a new one.

You did say you wanted to keep it cheap tho. Run 9 or 10 psi with gapped plugs and it will go better.

yeah changing heaps of stuff down the track is good but for now ill just run 10 psi and gap the plugs and see how it goes im thinking of investing in a r34gtt intercooler apparently they bolt in where the stock one is and are good for 200rwkw should go a bit better with that stuff with out throwing hell cash at it for now

Or you could be like me and sell a car wanting a lot of money spent for a car with the money spent but job done shit lol.

Somehow I wish I had another stock as a rock car to only do what mods I wanted as well as I can actually do them.

Careful not to buy another persons problem!

sell it and buy one with the work already done, cheapest way to make power.

Indeed this. I got my r33 GTSt cheapish. $6500. Already had a hd clutch and catback. Rest was stock. Now its worth $14k to me and that's not including labour of which I have done all of it. I would have bought something already done up. Not that I regret doing up my car (I kept all the stock parts) but I could have bought a forged GTSt already done up.

My advice is this... If you want a fast, reliable, good handling skyline then sell your stock one and use the cash toward getting one already done up. Do the boos mod but don't waste any money on it. You will save easily $5k in the long run. In my case that is less than a year.

yeah changing heaps of stuff down the track is good but for now ill just run 10 psi and gap the plugs and see how it goes im thinking of investing in a r34gtt intercooler apparently they bolt in where the stock one is and are good for 200rwkw should go a bit better with that stuff with out throwing hell cash at it for now

Personally, because I've been there, I would run 8psi through it while you still have a stock ECU. Mine would not run properly at all on 10psi. Easiest thing to do would be the high boost mid with the stock solenoid. Just have to cut and earth one wire and you get 7psi all the time. When you get an aftermarket ECU then go for 10-12psi

Read the tutorial on here for it. If you cut the wrong wire you'll have 5psi all the time instead

Now that would just be funny. That tutorial is easy to read and anyone should be able to do this mod. It was the first thing I did when I bought mine.

If your looking for cheap improvements buy yourself a decent bleed valve and wind in 10-12psi, gap plugs to 0.8mm, buy a second hand SAFC for $200, spend $200 getting it tuned and you'll get around 190rwkw with heaps more midrange. Not as much flexibility as a full ECU but much less cost and unless you are going to the next stage of mods you won't need it. You'll start to see the standard SMIC getting heat soaked so factor in a bigger, higher flowing FMIC. Be prepared to outlay for a new HD clutch and maybe a set of decent coilpacks in the near future as the standard one's are at least 15 years old.

Z

  • 1 month later...

hey guys sorry to add to this at a later date .. but ive bought a boost controller cranked it to 10psi and regapped the plugs and changed to the r34gtt smic cooler... im now tossing up between an safc computer, z32 nistuned ecu and a full blown after market power fc or microtech setup. i plan on in the future going high flowed turbo fuel pump and injectors big front mount cooler would the cheap safc computer not be able to cope with theses mods?? i just dont want to buy stuff that i am going to have to update down the track. the z32 ecus nistuned are great but its just as dear as a 2nd hand power fc it seems....

i would go nistune over power fc but it all comes down to your tuner go ask him what he would prefer and do according theres been a lot of power fc vs nistune and it seems nistune is starting to build some steam...power fc has had it's day time to come into the 21st century ang go nistune

i would go nistune over power fc but it all comes down to your tuner go ask him what he would prefer and do according theres been a lot of power fc vs nistune and it seems nistune is starting to build some steam...power fc has had it's day time to come into the 21st century ang go nistune

For R32 and R34 I agree but for an R33 there a number of complications I believe with getting a nistune setup running well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...