Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys

currently running 5-7psi on the stock turbo (rb25neo in a manual stagea)

just wondering if anyone has recommendations for my current situation.

I run 5psi most of the time and leave it set to that, my gf takes the car to uni a bit and i actually like to run it on lower boost and use more throttle and the natural torque of the engine

but at 7psi it was only dynoed at about 135awkw a couple of years ago (previous owner)

i want some more go and was thinking of taking the boost up to 10 or 12 psi

there is an eboost street going for about $250 locally to me that i was thinking about

or can i solder and redrill the restrictor out to allow more air to bleed off?

what do you think the best option is?

i'm also thinking about getting a nistune come summer, hence not wanting to run 10-12psi all the time

Thanks, Tom

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/379912-lower-pressure-boost-control/
Share on other sites

just get a bleed valve i bought one for 25 dollars and works a treat just make sure you have a aftermarket boost guage to set off. 10 should be fine i would do more mods before tune rather then everytime you make a change you need a tune but thats my opinion

yeah but i want to be able to run 2 pressures

one for me, one for everyone else

How do you want to be able to switch between these two pressures?

With the Bleed Valve you can work out your two points (5 and 10) and put markings on the bolt where it needs to be screwed in to for each setting.

Simple pop of the bonnet, unwind the screw until the mark, and you're on your new boost setting. Always go easy and keep and eye on the gauge for the first run after you adjust, to protect against overboosting.

Switching between two levels of boost on a daily basis wouldn't be a great option in my opinion though...

The Engine doesn't run as amazing as it could after a change in boost, you need to get it to relearn (disconnect battery to drain power from the system and reset the ECU) and adjust its maps a little bit to accommodate.

My ECU relearning experience comes from an RB25DET in a S2 33 GTST, so your results may vary...

Its possible, but not recommended imho.

how about doing the earthing mod to the solenoid and putting a switch in the car?

Sorry just reread the first post, scratch that idea.

sorry, i should have said, thats the method im using at the moment

its acutally a down grade for an rs4s as the stock ecu runs at 7 all the time, so my setup lets me force it down to 5 psi

i'll be driving from tas to qld again in about a month and its pretty good on the highway like that because on a big hill you can bury your foot and only use 5psi and the natural torque, this would also keep the air flow down and therefore stay on a leaner section of the fuel map

i might see if i can get the stock setup to bleed off a bit more on high boost with a slightly bigger hole in the stock restricter

i actually like to run it on lower boost and use more throttle and the natural torque of the engine

So by natural, you mean less – correct?

Because that’s what’s happening. Less boost = less torque. A lot of people that do the "wind down the boost" end up using full throttle everywhere and more RPM for the same cause. It’s a false economy really as more RPM more of the time is undue wear

The best boost controller on the market that I found was the right foot. You want more boost you simply press the foot further into the floor.

Works just the same for economy, you want better economy use less of the right foot. Regardless of if you run 5psi or 20psi the economy will be pretty much the same in off boost situations

So by natural, you mean less – correct?

Because that's what's happening. Less boost = less torque. A lot of people that do the "wind down the boost" end up using full throttle everywhere and more RPM for the same cause. It's a false economy really as more RPM more of the time is undue wear

The best boost controller on the market that I found was the right foot. You want more boost you simply press the foot further into the floor.

Works just the same for economy, you want better economy use less of the right foot. Regardless of if you run 5psi or 20psi the economy will be pretty much the same in off boost situations

yeah your right but i am not the only one using the car

im also thinking that the stock maps are really rich at high load, more boost = more load, less boost = less load

also the more open the throttle, the turbulence and resistance from the throttle body (pretty negligible thats the theory to the warm air intake thats popular in the states, gives slight fuel consumption improvements due to using less dense air etc, less power, more throttle, less resistance)

also, wouldnt more boost = more load?

so running lower boost on a day to day basis (if you kept the driving style the same) would also be better

I'll sell you my dual stage turbosmart boost controller. 2 boost settings changed by a switch in the cab. Hide the switch if you dont want anyone touching it.

PM Me if your interested. It worked fine when I was running stock boostish levels

could you have a boost Tee and a 3 port solenoid to by pass it at the flick of a switch to run gate pressure?

That's kind of what I have on mine.

Solenoid off = gate pressure.

Solenoid on = Boost controlled by ECU

but instead of an ECU or EBC doing the work have a TurboTech boost Tee? I had one on my skyline for a bit and still using one on my WRX, they're win.

Could be a cheaper option?

Yeah the Turbotech Original can flow a low psi but the V2 controller can't really go much under 9-10psi.

The 3 port solenoid option in conjunction witha t-pice and a manual gated controller is an easy set that works a treat on most systems. I can help there with a kit if need..

Mark

a hypergear rebuild is in the pipeline, just don't want to stress the turbo too much until i can afford to rebuild and tune

which could be a while unfortunately

i was thinking that a boost-t in the solenoid feed line would let me up the base pressure and then flicking the switch would bleed off some more pressure too

but then i'll only get the same rise as before

i've got a jaycar ebc, i just don't like that if the solenoid fails, it fails shut which = infinite boost

ok, so i've been thinking about it, and had a look on the interwebs

what about a setup like this?

post-51118-0-65270500-1320098862_thumb.jpg

when open, the stock solenoid allows all the pressure to reach the wastegate, when closed the turbotech controls the amount of pressure getting to the wastegate

Thoughts?

That will work, standard wastegate pressure, 5psi, with solenoid open, bleed valve boost when its closed. But I don't understand the need for dual boost.

Something to think about Tom, no matter what boost level you are running, when you plant the accelerator the ECU uses the last row on the fuel map. You don't see this on a map trace but it does it.

Without checking the table it is at about 3.8 - 3.9v TPS from 3000rpm and only about 2v TPS under that.

So at the lower boost level you are going to chew through unnecessary fuel at full throttle, which I can imagine with only 5psi on stock turbo you are going to do alot lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...