Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok so, my car is shit, that's a good start.

but seriously

I always road tune my car, just do it myself with the data logit package etc.

Thought, hey why not throw it on the dyno and have a quick look at where i am at.

I'm about to upgrade the exhaust and thought it would be interesting to see what difference is made and was thinking of helping out this site with some real world data etc.

my car ......

R32 GTR

R33 rb26 stock bottom end

JUN 264 9.7mm

700cc sards

z32 AFM's stock airbox, KnN panel

2860-5's

exhaust is...

HKS copy dumps

some no name s/s front pipe 63mm x 2 into 3"

3" decat

HKS super dragger

The dyno i used is a Dyno Dynamics with latest software etc, owned privately.

The owner has tuned a few cars but, he left me to my own to use his dyno etc and just go for it.:teehee:

This is great for me, because i love playing with this sort of stuff etc. Not awsome for when i would like support.

When i went i hadn't slept for 23 hours, because of night shift, yep, shit idea, so i really wasn't on the ball on the day either, :wacko:

any way, results....

Top graph boost and tourqe

bottom kw and AF

dont laugh......

IMG_0478.jpg

IMG_0477.jpg

Edited by blue_vl_t
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/380762-my-laughable-dyno-results/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You think so?

I was thinking i was running 1.5 bar, i have a 1.5 bar gauge and upped the boost until i thought it was at the top of the gauge,

so was quite shocked to see what his dyno had to say, assuming i was running 22 psi max, i assume his sensor is reading ok???

I will fit a better gauge soon anyway to see for sure.

I really think the top of the graph is really flat.

perhaps indicating an exhaust upgrade, which i will be doing regardless.

one other thing i was thinking, with the stock air box, i only run the stock air feed, i will remove the 'chamber' from the botom of the box to see if the extra 3" hole makes much difference.

really looks like a restriction to me, the power just rises and stops dead, then flat lines......

I have my theories, but i'm keen to see what people think if could be

I have some HPI 3" dumps and twin 3" into 4" system to go on, just needs a few more bit modified etc. should be soon

Also i do have some cam gears, but not fitted, mostly because they are ebay ones, and i'm unsure if i should trust them???

true, i only have a cheap ass turbotech valve on it too.

Before a retest i will

remove the chamber from the air box

install a EBC, probably Profec B 2

install the new exhaust.

Triple check the cam timing and base ignition timing.

funny thing is, with any more than 14 degrees of timing the power seemed to drop, unless the heat soak make s a huge difference??

Ahh the joy of learning :laugh:

It also looks a bit lazy onto boost... I know -5s aren't exactly punchy on a 2.6L but surely you should be hitting 20psi a bit earlier than that?

I was thinking this also, "big" (lol) rush of power seems very close to 5000rpm on the street :unsure:

Edited by blue_vl_t

Ill bet with the new exhaust you will be able to run a heap more timing and pick up some response to boot.

lets hope so.

I really wanted to do a before/after test, will be good for me and the forum, if it makes the difference to push power over 350rwkw where it should be i will be quite shocked!!!

true, i only have a cheap ass turbotech valve on it too.

Im just running off actuators and a bleed, on much sooner than you are :)

Fix the exhaust, also check the cams are correctly dialled in, that can often be a problem.

Get 20psi holding rather than falling away to 15psi and you'll be right.

Im just running off actuators and a bleed, on much sooner than you are :)

Fix the exhaust, also check the cams are correctly dialled in, that can often be a problem.

Get 20psi holding rather than falling away to 15psi and you'll be right.

on the top graph, the boost is dropping from 27 to 25 psi, fairly sure thats right.............

Oh yes indeed, looking from my phone again, i should stop doing that :(

The boost graph is even lazier then than i thought now im looking from my PC.

Definately exhaust and get the boost control sorted so it comes on much earlier like it should. It still could indeed be the cams not dialled in correctly too.

on the top graph, the boost is dropping from 27 to 25 psi, fairly sure thats right.............

No thats wrong, thats your torque. Notice it starts way off the charts for what you could consider vacuum? Whereas the other one is accurate for what you expect.

Your boost is hitting 20 and bleeding down to 15.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I drive the Tiguan much harder than the Skyline in all conditions, because it just grips and hooks, unlike the R33 shit box
    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
×
×
  • Create New...