Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 886
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm running an atr43 ss1. I was hoping for 240kw, but i am happy with the result, it drives really well, it's only running 14psi so it makes me think it's even safer. I'm not sure where the temp sensor was, the booth was a constant 24 degrees so I guess that would help a bit though.

Il post up the dyno later. But needless to say there was some big holes in the old tune. It was pinging on 7psi.

Do you realise that this is a completely new engine, better compression, and the CAS is probably in a completely different spot?

Don't get me wrong im very happy with it, I just expected to be running 18-20 psi like most other people.

Did you just randomly pick those numbers?

Do you know what boost the turbo is actually capable of producing efficiently?

I was actually referring the fuel maps having massive holes in them, the new maps are nice and smooth.

The turbo was built by stao to run 20psi, am I wrong to think it would do differently to what it was built for?

Considering youve got a SS1 not the SS1PU i think thats a really good result.

It comes on really well and had a good usable powerband. I cant see it falling off up top at all.

Take this from a Hypergear follower: that turbo is doing exactly what its meant to do. You should be very happy with that result, good work.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...