Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

non turbo silvias an skylines never hit puberty.

Pretty much anything will be better.

But hey, if you want one, get one, just make sure when you add nos you strengthen your floorpan as the last thing you wanna see is it ripping off as a result of damaging your manifold

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

apprently they're worse on fuel then skylines/silvia's, so i;ve been told..

skylines chew fuel faster, and have bigger tanks, the 4 bangers imprezza have smaller tanks and get roughly same k's its not all about the ks its about the amount of $ it takes to fill the tank too.

Edited by sultanaz

cops cant really get me for anything if i've got nothing illegal on my car..

and im not really into doing drifts, races, burnouts on public roads, thats what im mates bushbasher is for...

Cops Target Skylines and Silvias whether or not they are defective. If they wanna finger you, they will find some sort of defect in your car whether it be frayed seat belt,missing grill,no third brake light, or even smaller stuff. Just because they are not fond of the type of car you chose as a daily for driving to work.

And you can say "oh but my car wont have these things" and i will say "maybe so but they'll find something if they want to ;) "

And i re-iterate the part where i say "if they want to".

my n/a 34 uses about 11-12L/100km for driving around town .. if ive beeen out for long drives and lots of freeway action it gets to about 10 or so at best. not particularly the most fuel efficient cars.

if you dont want a falcodore cos their common, you prob wont be wanting a magna or anything of the sorts - but imo for your kinds of purposes they would be the best .. especially if theyve got LPG conversions. theres usually a reason why their common though - consider that.

my next recommendation would be something like a civic or as marc said a SSS pulsie .. but you dont like FWD

why? you've said yourself you leave the burnouts and drifts for your mates bushbasher - so whats the problem with a nice FWD car?

ive driven SSS pulsars and VTEC civics, i love em. their pretty good fun, and imo could well be more fun than my n/a skyline.

all mine does is look pretty and handle well and comfortably with a set of decent coilovers and good tyres. you could make a FWD handle just as well with similar mods, which you'll probably get for cheaper too!

oh and your eardrums will blow if you exhorst it - again, not the best choice for a daily.

and btw lol at the 121 bubble bros thumbsup.gif

jono your car looks siccckkk

jono your car looks sickk

jono your car looks sickk

jono your car looks sickk

jono your car looks sickk

jono your car looks sickk

jono your car looks sickk

jono your car looks sickk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...