Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What is transient/part throttle response like though, not everyone spends all day at WOT,

I would bet my left nut the 2835 poo's all over the Hypergear stuff at normal street loads and rpm

So you mean cars with result that made less power on WOT all over the rev range should drive heaps better on street load? If that is the case then no one would be dumping money in R&D for better response and power delivery.

I can take you for a test drive if you are in Melbourne.

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I appears the Joey, myself and others that are running the 2835 seem to be getting ~280 @ about 18-20psi (just generalizing/average) where the HG units seem to need 20-22 to get those figures.

Cough Cough Trent showed me Joeyjoey's dyno using the same correction factor that he uses for Tao's dynos and it made 268rwkw. It only makes 280rwkw when you change the correction factor...

Plus Joeys result is full boost at 3500rpm, not 3200rpm like your dyno shows Dave.

When using the exact same dyno the SS1 on my car made 244rwkw and 20psi by 3200rpm. The SS1PU fits very closely to the SS1PU ~270kw and 3500rpm full boost and the SS2 very closely to the 3076 280-300rwkw and 3800rpm full boost.

huh???? are you saying my tuner is falsifying my dyno readouts as well...??? wtf

Hmmm cant remember saying that. Your setup has a few more mods too RIPS aftermarket plenum and ARC super induction box.

Midread sorry. So why does he change correction factors?

All on same dyno same correction etc

2835 made 277kw full boost 3200

Ss2 made 244kw 19psi

Ss1.5 made 259 19psi but didnt back it up. Ran 246 next

Atr43g3 made 232 kw 19psi maxed stock injectors at 6000rpm. This one feels strong as now with bigger injectors only road tuned but. Very curious to see what it makes

enough talk, overlay the dyno plots.... lets see which has more under the curve...

and not using some demo car thats been tweaked to get a curve.

Sounds good but back to back on the same dyno using the same correction factor etc.

So you mean cars with result that made less power on WOT all over the rev range should drive heaps better on street load? If that is the case then no one would be dumping money in R&D for better response and power delivery.

I can take you for a test drive if you are in Melbourne.

NO!

I am saying that WOT means very little on a street car,

a car that can make +ve inlet pressure at 20% throttle and 3000rpm is better than a car that needs 50% throttle to make +ve inlet pressure at 3000rpm etc

Midread sorry. So why does he change correction factors?

All on same dyno same correction etc

2835 made 277kw full boost 3200

Ss2 made 244kw 19psi

Ss1.5 made 259 19psi but didnt back it up. Ran 246 next

Atr43g3 made 232 kw 19psi maxed stock injectors at 6000rpm. This one feels strong as now with bigger injectors only road tuned but. Very curious to see what it makes

Well clearly the 3 Hypergear turbos have other issues that are holding the turbo back.

Dave's setup is pretty damn awesome, lots of additional parts and effort have gone into that car. Engine bay looks unreal.

Dont think its comparing apples with apples.

You have tuned 3 Hypergear turbos and Trent would have tuned 50+.

NO!

I am saying that WOT means very little on a street car,

a car that can make +ve inlet pressure at 20% throttle and 3000rpm is better than a car that needs 50% throttle to make +ve inlet pressure at 3000rpm etc

Which we dont have any measurements on so basically you are just guessing.

Well clearly the 3 Hypergear turbos have other issues that are holding the turbo back.

Dave's setup is pretty damn awesome, lots of additional parts and effort have gone into that car. Engine bay looks unreal.

Dont think its comparing apples with apples.

You have tuned 3 Hypergear turbos and Trent would have tuned 50+.

That is correct no doubt, it may just be the difference between dyno's but we cant back the numbers up thats all. The ss1.5 i installed and made sure everything was done correctly including the 3inch intake etc. Its nice to drive sounds wicked but just didnt quite have the top end he was hoping for.

I new it wouldn't take long for you to call bullsh1t Harey, my post in which you quoted says that the HG seems to need a little more boost to make the same figures that is all.

Personally I couldnt care less anymore if you think all of us "2835 fanboys" as you have called us before just like to get our tuners to play around with ramp rates blah blah blah so we can show a dyno graph that is more impressive than yours. That's just absurd.

You seem to be o e of the biggest HKS/Garrett haters on these forums.

Fact: the HG turbos are great bang for buck and stoa does great work.

Fact 2: hks turbos are also a great turbo but you pay for it

Fact 3: if you were to have some kind of race with bolting up the HG compared to the hks I can promise you the hks will be on and strapped up on the rollers while you are still working out what to do with you water lines and wondering why the dump is fouling on the air con drain.

Sorry man but this is just how it is, not trying to start a war.

Hmmm cant remember saying that. Your setup has a few more mods too RIPS aftermarket plenum and ARC super induction box.

Hang on a sec, your saying a front facing plenum and an aftermarket air intake is maybe allowing me to make more power... huh

there are heaps of thread on SAU saying these mods make no more power... so which is it???

Im not saying bullsh!t, I think they are fantastic turbo. I am just showing the other side and I dont think the difference is quite what a few of you make it out to be.

Fact 4 you will have to work for another month to pay off the additional hks pricetag :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Increasing overlap will bring the torque down earlier (and make your idle sound sick lol). Worth a shot (if you dyno time) to experience a bit (providing you are confident your valves won't kiss your pistons). Is to just take off 5 degrees across the boosted area of the map, and then retard the exhaust cam let's say, 3 degrees at a time and then overlay all the runs with VCT on all the way and VCT off as soon as you make positive pressure. Ideally you would have a total of 6x overlays to looks at 0 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve 0 exhaust & VCT on all the way -5 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve -5 exhaust & VCT on all the way -10 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve -10 exhaust & VCT on all the way Just leave your O2 wideband closed loop on for all of the boost area & RPM, and hopefully there isn't too much fuel correction needed and the Haltech is fast enough to compensate (I do this, then apply the correction to the main table). Getting that overlay data should give you a good indication of what to aim for.
    • So, my main limitation here is that the car does not have an oil pressure sensor by default, just a switch. As part of my tune I bought an oil pressure sensor upgrade so I now have access to oil pressure levels and logging rather than just the boolean behaviour of the switch but this means I need to use the tuning app to display this value. So, this rules out using any other app on the iPad. The app will also flash when pressure drops which is a nice feature. I have replaced the centre screen with an Android one, which is awesome for Android Auto, but I think it might be too far away and out of my line of sight. I might add some gauges to it this weekend and just see. I guess if its just temp and oil pressure I can make them massive! 🤣  
    • This is what the look like normally. Except we only got the 2 doors locally
    • Back pressure is not really a function of the exhaust itself, but the turbine/housing. So the question/point remains valid. I would be fitting an EMAP tapping point and seeing what is going on in the exhaust manifold before committing to throwing boost at it. Flow. No intercooler is actually rated for continuous operation at any power level wrt temperatures, as they are no actually capable of shifting the required amounts of heat on a continuous basis. They get hot during a pul, then dump some of that heat into the external air (and some back into the internal air) during off load moments/periods). You probaby do need a bigger core, given the power level you're already at is somewhat above the "rating" of the cooler. Put pressure tapping points either side of the core (which possibly you already have, if you have a boost source near the compressor outlet and tapping near the throttle for existing purposes) and report on delta P across the core.   I haven't done the mass flow calculation to see where you would be sitting on the compressor map at the ~450is rwkW level we're talking here, but if you look just at the PR you're running at, which is ~2.8-2.9, then you have a really really wide swath of the compressor map to run in, and so long as you were making between about 45-75 lb/min of flow, you should have really good comp efficiency, with the ideal being betweem 55 and 65. I can't see the need to shift drastically on the map to get better results.
    • Welcome 🙂 The ER34 wheels and slight lowering suit the R33 sedan really well. I'm firmly in the 'keep it stock, at least on the outside' camp.
×
×
  • Create New...