Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

For the past year I have run an Apexi pod filter in my R34 GTT, using a JJR shroud in an effort to seal it off from the engine bay heat. But I've never liked the shroud because it is not a perfect seal and would still allow a lot of engine bay heat in. I also hate the fact that it doesn't have a snorkel or some kind of duct feeding cool air to it - instead the air has to find its way through the small gap behind the headlight.

So I have decided to design a custom airbox which will be able to accommodate an Apexi pod filter and will be sized so that the stock airbox lid will clip onto it, and in turn allow the stock snorkel to slot in as well. I have come up with a design in CAD and have made a full scale model using thick cardboard to allow me to test fit - it still needs a few more small tweaks to get the AFM angle and position spot on before I consider making the final product. I am planning on using perspex but also considering aluminium and borrowing my friend's welder.

What are people's thoughts on this? Something which you guys would be interested in or not worth the effort?

I know there is a valid argument to simply sticking with the standard airbox and panel filter, but I'd miss the induction noise that you can only get with a pod. My time is free and the materials aren't exactly going to cost me very much. Thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/385725-r34-gtt-custom-air-box/
Share on other sites

Would be very interested to see the outcome, as I am also looking for a cold air solution. I also run a pod and have been thinking about getting the JJR shroud but like you I think its a little counter productive without fresh air feeding into it. I just love the induction noise too much to go to a panel filter.

Let us know how you go and would like to see pics!

Don't use perspex. It will stay nice and cool while the engine is running (because of the induction air going through it), but when you shut down a hot engine, the bay temps will rise and the perspex will get soggy and it will all go to crap.

Alright, I've sent an email off to a local plastics company to see if they have a product available to suit. I am hoping for a thickness of 2 - 3mm max.

The design of the actual box is almost spot on now, just have to adjust the shape a little bit to get more clearance between it and the stock intercooler piping. It's still going to take time though - I still have to design brackets so it bolts up to the stock mounting holes, and try and source some clips.

I also have to buy a standard airbox and snorkel to check the airbox is sitting at the right height, to meet up with the lid. At the moment I am just working with accurate lid dimensions and a rough position for where the stock airbox usually sits.

Edited by R34mac

I've been thinking about making something Custom for years. i've got a Apexi pod with the stock snorkel helping feed air in the direction of the pod but dont have anything other than that. It seems to go ok but fails when your not moving alot. I'm now thinking of going back to the stock airbox and use a highflow pannel filter. I've had my fun over ther years with induction noise but now im looking for something quiet that will still perform, the added bonus of one less thing to defect is a bonus as well.

Anyone know performance wise what the difference will be between the Apexi pod by itself and the stock airbox with snorkel and high flow panel filter?

I've been thinking about making something Custom for years. i've got a Apexi pod with the stock snorkel helping feed air in the direction of the pod but dont have anything other than that. It seems to go ok but fails when your not moving alot. I'm now thinking of going back to the stock airbox and use a highflow pannel filter. I've had my fun over ther years with induction noise but now im looking for something quiet that will still perform, the added bonus of one less thing to defect is a bonus as well.

Anyone know performance wise what the difference will be between the Apexi pod by itself and the stock airbox with snorkel and high flow panel filter?

I've heard 5kW but in reality I think the difference would be negligible. Most people think running a pod makes a big difference but I bet it just feels faster because of the induction noise.

Basically I love the induction noise and I'm trying to come up with a stock looking setup that lets me run a pod which isn't sucking in hot air from the engine bay, or stuck behind some half-arsed shroud. The actual kW gains between it and a stock airbox & filter are irrelevant to me.

Edited by R34mac

Hay guys i bought a k&n apollo kit (google) it, i gained 4KW aftera dyno run, works well. Entire Kit cost me $200.00 anyone interested in seeing some pics send me a pm with your number and i can txt u some pics, dont have any pics on my pc. So pretty much, remove the entire airbox from engine bay. Get a 3" afm adaptor from either autobarn or supercheap.

The kit comes with a duct kit, it than attachs to the adaptor, than i ran it through the bottom of the engine bay and mounted the pod filter box up in the passenger wheel guards and than has another peice of duct which i than brought out the front grill which gets its cold air from.

I would be happy to help anyone with their installation too if you choose to go down this path, it looks good and you can definitely feel an improvement from just having the old dodgy 3" pod filter sitting out in the engine bay receiving hot engine air.

I have plans to get a carbon fiber cold airbox from JJR & a GTR snorkel & cut a slot in the box for the snorkel to fit into, I am yet to try this or measure anything up so still not 100% sure if it will but if it does it should work pretty well.

I used perspex, it never went soggy. Good stuff and easy to work with. If you really want a tight seal from the engine bay you need to use some neutral silicone or something else to seal around the edges of the box facing the engine. Ill be making one once I know for sure that my intake pipe isn't going to be modified. I'll be using some aluminium checker plate which I will line the inside with something to deter heat. A full perspex box isn't a good idea. If anything, build it like a computer case, have a mostly metal frame with a piece of perspex in the top panel for looks.

Haha.

Ive never seen the point in a cold airbox if you have a decent intercooler. The turbo is going to superheat the air regardless of how many degrees the intake is at the filter. Be it a couple of degrees cooler..

Sitting in traffic isnt going to do shit. The air moves so slowly through the pipework, even if it came in at -10'C it would still be 50+'C after a little while idling.

The second you give the engine some revs, and get the air moving the temps will plummet. airbox or not. Tried it a million times lol.

Try this too, get on the freeway, cruise at 100km/h and throw it in neutral. Watch the intake temps rise just as much as they do in traffic. If i remember ill even post a video of this over the weekend.

Haha.

Ive never seen the point in a cold airbox if you have a decent intercooler. The turbo is going to superheat the air regardless of how many degrees the intake is at the filter. Be it a couple of degrees cooler..

Sitting in traffic isnt going to do shit. The air moves so slowly through the pipework, even if it came in at -10'C it would still be 50+'C after a little while idling.

The second you give the engine some revs, and get the air moving the temps will plummet. airbox or not. Tried it a million times lol.

Try this too, get on the freeway, cruise at 100km/h and throw it in neutral. Watch the intake temps rise just as much as they do in traffic. If i remember ill even post a video of this over the weekend.

I believe the boxes do jack shit. If you measure the temperature of your intake charge I am fairly sure it will be fairly warm to hot, as compressed air normally is. I really doubt shielding that bit of heat from the engine is going to make more than a bees dick of difference. But hey, it looks cool.

Surely the point is to make the engine as efficient as possible? Haters gonna hate :glare:

Regardless, here's a screenshot of my design. I made a full size test version out of thin plastic and it sits comfortably in the engine bay and clears the stock intercooler pipes nicely. I can't really progress until I buy a stock airbox and make sure it sits in the exact same position, so the snorkel and lid line up with it perfectly. It is worth noting that I have designed it around an Apexi power intake so pod filters which are any bigger will most likely not fit.

I also plan on revising the design to minimise the amount of individual pieces it is constructed out of.

post-45310-0-98828700-1324027459_thumb.jpg

Edited by R34mac

Ah, you see, here's the deal.  All those who are saying there is no benefit to a cold air intake if you have a good intercooler are missing one rather important point.  It's not how cold the air is that reaches you engine, it's how much of it there is.  And this is why a cold air intake is a good thing, even with a perfect intercooler.

Let's say that the air temperature outside the car is 25°C.  That air has a density of 1.18 kg/m3 at sea level.  If the air under the bonnet is say, 60°C, then it has density 1.06 kg/m3.  That makes the ratio of those two densities equal to 1.113.  ie, the cooler air is 11.3% more dense than the hot air.  You get 11.3% more air in every given volume.  Now, the maximum amount of air you can pull through the turbo inlet is limited by the sonic velocity.  Let's say you're at the limit (and this is what restrictors in competition classes are all about, so it does happen).  At 25°C, the speed of sound is 346 m/s.  At 60°C the speed of sound is 366m/s.  That's a ratio of 0.945.  ie, the cool air has a sonic velocity that is 94.5% of the hot air.  If you multiply our 2 ratios together, you get that at limiting flow, the turbo can ingest 1.113*0.945 = 5.2% more air mass.

That holds true at lower flow rates than the limit too.  Turbos are like most pumps (including the engine).  They breathe on a volumetric basis, but they do work (and consume power from the turbine) and give benefit to the engine on a mass basis.  Clearly it is in your best interests to give the coolest air to the turbo inlet.

And all this is before we even get to the question of pressure ratios.  For any given power level the engine must consume a certain mass of air.  If the air is less dense getting to the turbo inlet, then you have to pump it up to a higher pressure (and hence pressure ratio) to get the required amount of mass into the engine than if it arrived in a cooler, more dense state.  Higher pressure ratios are usually located at lower efficiency lines on a compressor map (for a well sized and matched turbo).  QED.

Edited by GTSBoy

Surely the point is to make the engine as efficient as possible? Haters gonna hate :glare:

Regardless, here's a screenshot of my design. I made a full size test version out of thin plastic and it sits comfortably in the engine bay and clears the stock intercooler pipes nicely. I can't really progress until I buy a stock airbox and make sure it sits in the exact same position, so the snorkel and lid line up with it perfectly. It is worth noting that I have designed it around an Apexi power intake so pod filters which are any bigger will most likely not fit.

I also plan on revising the design to minimise the amount of individual pieces it is constructed out of.

So all that effort for what is the same as a stock airbox???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...