Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all.

Just compiling my parts that I need for future upgrade.

I have stumbled a cross these

http://www.vividracing.com/catalog/deatschwerks-flow-fuel-injector-750cc-nissan-skyline-rb26dett-8902-p-108463.html

Just wondering if anyone here knows anything about them? The fuel pump I hear is good but I find nothing in google about the injectors.

I'm leaning towards these mainly because sard 700cc injectors are discontinued and I do not wish to go 800cc because I have to solder new plugs on.

Whereas above said injectors are drop in see ya later.

Thoughts? Opinions?

Thanks

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The DW 740cc injectors used to be high flows. DW have since told me they have these manufactures specifically for them and they are not high flows.(This is atleast true for the side feed injectors not sure about the top feeds)

I have a set of 740's will let you know when I finish my car and get it tuned.

Plenty of EVO's 35 GTRS are using DW injectors so they can not be that bad

Hmmm... Haha

I'm pretty sure these are high flow. But what do I know haha.

Guilt toy, of you wouldn't mind, do you care to elaborate why they are so terrible on you're eyes?

Of the other platform tuners are running them then they can't have such a bad rep.

I have a set of Deatschwerks 550s which I ran in my RB25DET and now in my RB30/25 going fine.

If I get my engine forged and go to E85 and big kw I would upgrade to ID1000 or ID2000 but not because there was anything wrong with my Deatschwerks.

I'm running a set in my R34 GTT and they work fine, no complaints from the tuner either. I liked the idea of direct fitment and retaining the quad orifice spray design.

I'm running a set in my R34 GTT and they work fine, no complaints from the tuner either. I liked the idea of direct fitment and retaining the quad orifice spray design.

+1 running 600cc's in my R34 GTT with 340HP atw, Idle is smooth as and they work well on the power end.

Tuner was very happy with them.

if only the forum had a tag function like FB..... ARTZ needs to see this

guilt toy your being sarcastic right?

Lol...yeah i see it...some reason my crappy phone doesnt want me to log in...

But anyways, after harrassing a few members on here (:cheers: guys) for info and asking Trent, Im getting the DWs..1000cc FTW... :thumbsup:

just trying to find out how much postage from the US is gunna be as we speak..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...