Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ithink the 6265 would be a better choice i have -5 o mine with 2.7 stroker full boost at 4000rpm with eflex fuel.i think the 6265 will be similar (-5)but with more kw.that ill be my choice when i go single set up

good luck ith build mate

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Pretty sure this is Wei's old car. Check me though, if im right the vin would be 6U9000BNR34005487.

Aparently Eugene from JDM performance used to own it.

Looked good when i last saw it, congrats on the purchase and best of luck with the build.

Pretty sure this is Wei's old car. Check me though, if im right the vin would be 6U9000BNR34005487.

Aparently Eugene from JDM performance used to own it.

Looked good when i last saw it, congrats on the purchase and best of luck with the build.

Yeah mate you'd be right, I bought this off Wei about 6 months ago... Best thing I ever spent my cash on haha

Yeah, I just got off google looking into the 6265 and 6765 comparisons and I think the 6765 is more suited to a 3L...

The 6265 is rated at 520kw so we'll see how we go haha

Quick update...

Just bought a Powertune twin in tank fuel pump, and two walbro pumps rated at 1000hp for the GTR.

Want something that's not going to be noisy or smell of fuel, plus hidden from the fuzz haha :thumbsup:

I would spend more time on google understand turbo's. I would like you to look at compressor maps then choose one of the shelf. Turbo's that are HP rated , this only tells you the entry hole size that equals to how much air flow through the hole size.

If you need some good info let me know.

Geez my old car is still alive and is going to be an animal! I just read the whole thread, sorry to hear what happened to your car Brad. I loved this car when i had it and got it running well with its old -5 setup. I can tell the car went to a good owner and hope the mods get done soon and make it more of a monster :)

Update...

Just finished at Knight engines, pulling the engine down and the crank is F#%£ED!!!

1# piston took the brunt of the oil surge and the bearing was completely fried, had a 10c piece sized chunk missing... :whistling:

So from here, a 2.8L crank is being ordered and the precision billet 6765 with T4 divided rear will be ordered also...

Kyle from 6boost is doing up one of his twin scroll steam pipe manifold with dual external watsegates to go with this build so it's going to be insane.. Haha

Will post pics up tonight...

Cheers

Pics...

Scoring on the bore.

post-47369-0-71016700-1327122316_thumb.jpg

Butchered head where the 10c piece sized bit of bearing bounced around at 8000rpm.

post-47369-0-46935700-1327122428_thumb.jpg

#1 Piston top.

post-47369-0-49495500-1327122528_thumb.jpg

#1 Piston con rod (bottom of photo) cap is black... Torched haha

post-47369-0-31130300-1327122625_thumb.jpg

"Butchered head where the 10c piece sized bit of bearing bounced around at 8000rpm."

I dont quite understand how a piece of the bearing gets into the cylinder? :unsure:

None the less, good luck with the build and sorry to hear about the wheels mate, shit like that isnt even a bad joke.. what wheels were they? te37?

"Butchered head where the 10c piece sized bit of bearing bounced around at 8000rpm."

I dont quite understand how a piece of the bearing gets into the cylinder? :unsure:

None the less, good luck with the build and sorry to hear about the wheels mate, shit like that isnt even a bad joke.. what wheels were they? te37?

We were thinking the exact same thing, but the only piece of debris in the sump or oil filter or anywhere was one messed up bit of bearing so...? Couldn't tell you to be honest... It's the only thing there.. :blink:

The stolen rims were stock GTR rims. I should be receiving a set of 18x10.5 +15 TE37 SLs in two or three weeks though haha :bunny:

The piston to head clearence is about 1mm in the quench area (less at higher rpm due to rod stretch).

When the rod bearing went by by that clearence disappeared. Then the piston crown quench area collided with the head. Chain reaction effect.

The piston to head clearence is about 1mm in the quench area (less at higher rpm due to rod stretch).

When the rod bearing went by by that clearence disappeared. Then the piston crown quench area collided with the head. Chain reaction effect.

Oh I see, thanks for the insight mate..

Hey guys...

Due to the budget for this build not being unlimited, I have decided not to skimp on the reliability measures and save money by not getting the stroker kit and getting a new R34 crank from Nissan...

I'd rather have a bullet proof RB26 then a normal RB28.

:cheers:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...