Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i think people are confussed it had a full tune for all the bolt ons but for a gt3071 then all he did was change the turbo nothing else still somewhat a full tune

its not like he took his stock turbo off ran a gt42 and turned the boost up

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i think people are confussed it had a full tune for all the bolt ons but for a gt3071 then all he did was change the turbo nothing else still somewhat a full tune

its not like he took his stock turbo off ran a gt42 and turned the boost up

I need to link the facepalms again....

Edited by Cowboy1600

hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

I want to see a boost graph, my guess is it's got a whole guts full at 140km/hr

The power to rpm ratio is wores then my 3540 mokup (hypergear atr45) while 160kws short. Looks very lazy and not making much power either. Not a very good turbo.

well there must be something wrong with the tuner/turbo or engine cause it was very close power very close dyno to not much difference at all across the whole board

lets just think its a $400 turbo hg are 1500 so its not a bad power figure for the price

Have you seen a dyno graph for a 3071? That dyno graph up there is disgusting. Sags and flops and makes power at what about 5krpm then falls off all the way to red line. I bet that housing on the turbo will glow red after a couple runs.

If I had to do it all over again, knowing what I know now, I would still go hypergear over this turbo. Keep it for a Civic, a skyline deserves more.

Edited by SargeRX8

yeah i kno but its not mine and not in a skyline his goin to a gt3076 just wanted to do this at a laugh

and i know his dyno graph of the gt3071 i was there and watched it

not goin to name names but the tuner is known for bad tunes he has done a fair few shitty tunes here in melbourne

sayin that he might goto a different tuner and try another power run of a new fresh tune

his 3071 was pretty much the same as the dyno i put up there not much difference at all so giving the 3071 dyno sheets are better then this then it clearly rules out the turbo

so its either engine/ or tuner

i know you want this to be the most awesome turbo in history, but face facts... it isn't.

at this point you cant really say anything about the tune/tuner as it doesn't have one.

yes you DO need to tune for the different turbo, even if it makes similar power. also the kw figure is probably the least important part of the tune, and not the reason we tune cars. it's not how many kw you make, but how you make them

this is what a ~280rwkw turbo on an RB 25 SHOULD look like:

med_gallery_36777_3194_109738.jpg

note the response.

yeah i know what your saying joey , i kno its not the best turbo but what im trying to say with the tuner who tuned his engine using a gt3071 the dyno graph looked excatly the same as the one i posted which seems to tell me its the tuner as it didnt look very good even with the garrett turbo with a full tune

i dont want to name the guy who tuned it but i kno alot of people have had problems with him maybe i should tell my mate to go visit trent and get a REAL tune done

  • 2 weeks later...

i guess thats there opinion as i dont really have one as its not mine i couldnt care less only stating that its still goin strong for a shitty $400 bolt on turbo with no tune

its booked in for a tune next week so i guess we will see what its like

1328700312[/url]' post='6224982']

i guess thats there opinion as i dont really have one as its not mine i couldnt care less only stating that its still goin strong for a shitty $400 bolt on turbo with no tune

its booked in for a tune next week so i guess we will see what its like

Kudos to him for at least giving it a go, after all it's not that often you see proper results of a eBay turbo posted up. It may not be as good as a legit garret, but at least it's making some sort of boost...then technically it's doing what it's meant to do...in saying that though I would have waited for the proper one...and he can't sell it and make any means of profit off it...it's already a cheap turbo, a used eBay one you'd probably have to pay someone to take it away haha...

Nice job anyway. Like others have said a photo of the turbo on the car would be nice...Cheers!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...