Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I didn't say it was similar....just that it was better value. Why many spend hundreds or a couple thousand on rebuilding (or building) an RB20, when that money gets you a good portion of the way to a 25?

How is spending $800 on getting new rings and bearings in a bottom end similar to spending $6000 on sticking a second hand rb25 into the r32?

Its never only a little bit extra to do a motor swap in a skyline. The entire drive line will end up being swapped out once you start hunting for that "extra"

Not to mention engineering certs cos a 25 is over 15% bigger than a 20,

the 20 is cool id stick with it too

If you really care so much about power and speed get a sportbike, you will never go faster.

I like my 32 cos i can eat and drive and stay out of the rain, not cos its super fast.

Nothing wrong with a 20.

post-89755-0-25772300-1329614607_thumb.jpg

20s are fun but 25 is a better motor but unless you want to start making big power the 20 will just keep going

When my 20 eventually pops, I was going to go with a 30, what's so great about 25's?

Edited by Missileman

Yeh, RB20s are terrible! Here is a comparo from a few years ago ... The RB20 gives away 500cc, half a point of compression and variable timing on the inlet cam ... AND is an older engine. So on paper where you dont have to pay for things or get them registered it seems a no brainer. But in the real world where your folding stuff is what you are handing over, and you want to get the car registered with correct engine numbers etc

med_gallery_462_50_14883.jpg

BassJunky R34: GCG Hi Flow, Poncams same tuner and dyno as me

Abo Bob R34: GCG Hi Flow, built engine, think he had Poncams as well. Different dyno, different tune

My setup: Std RB20, std plenum, a TD06-20G setup

Main reason for the difference is the R32s higher final drive ratio adn 17" wheel vs 18s of the R34...but all are 4th gear pulls. Even if you only compare BassJunky's result and mine as they are both from teh same dyno and tuner....you can readily see that when you open up the taps why the RB20 easily keeps pace with the RB25NEO with a Hi-Flow GCG turbo.

So not saying the RB25 isnt superior...but I sure as hell have made the decision to keep my money in my bank account and spend the money on tyres, fuel, oil and driving it at the only place you can legally and safely enjoy the performance.

So getting back to the OP, fix the bolt on gremlins and ascertain the health of the engine. In which case a $600-800 wrecker motor with warranty is your quickest, cheapest and safest fix. If you have the budget to rip it all out and start again with a later model engine then go for it...just talk to industry people as it is not as cheap as many people make out

PS...i will add both R34 engines popped at that power. One going forged internals after melting a ring land and Bass Junky's car having another engine put in...neither saw as much let along more track work then my car...though they both probably see more road kms than my car. Not to say their cars were inferior, both tops cars and modded carefully/well. A large part of the reason my engine is still running is luck, but a part of it is testament to the strength of the RB20

But how annoying was it before it came on boost?

I have had this setup since early 2003. You would think I dont find it too annoying when you consider I have ran this setup for 9 years! :thumbsup: I appreciate its not for everybody...but sticking with the 20 is definitely the cheapest, very reliable and easiest option.

I don't hate the RB20. I've had mine since 1999. But that whole time the total lack of any torque before it comes on boost (and that's with the standard turbo!) followed by the chance of it breaking traction (will it, or won't it? wiil it or won't it? Will or won't it?) has bothered me. A bigger engine that actually makes some torque and does some acceleration before it comes on boost is a much nicer thing.

The reason I say an RB25 is a good thing (and not an RB30) is simply because it's all that much harder to do the RB30 thing. Both from the point of view of putting it together, and from the legal side.

But sucks to all you guys who have to get an RB25 engineered in the eastern states. Here in SA you just roll up to Regency with with 25 in (and everything else legal enough to pass) and put over the pits. Sure, maybe you have to go back if they bust you on something. But all the same....

  • 3 weeks later...

Ahhhh, the 'ol 20 vs 25 thread again hey? SHould have seen this coming nyaanyaa.gif

Have been away for the past few weeks so just got back and stuck into it. Compression test results were;

1 - 140

2 - 140

3 - 137

4 - 140

5 - 142

6 - 140

I understand that to be a farily healthy RB20? Hardly any variance between the cylinders would indicate that its just an older engine wearing evenly? The cluster has 180xxx on it so i think its about right. Should i get a leakdown test done as well if there doesnt seem to be anything wrong with the compression test?

When pulling off the throttle body intake pipe to do the compression test i noticed lots of oil in there, sorry for all the noob questions but what does having oil in your intake pipes mean? Surely it cant be a good thing haha, f**ked turbo seals? There was also one other thing i found when poking around in the engine bay, all the turbo->manifold nuts had come undone, even with locking tabs! So i decided i will pull the turbo off to have a look at it to decide how healthy it is. It will be good to know in what sort of condition everything is before i go stupid with the mods and find my engine or turbo is in shit confition! Will post pics of said turbo when its off :)

OdOUM.jpg

Prb14.jpg

have you put new plugs in it lately?

as for the smoke id say its fried rings-with it having blowby.

It got 6 new BCPR6ES about 5 months ago and had not been having any issues. I did finally get the coilpack issue sorted out and it was a dead #4 coilpack. As i dont have lots of money to throw around at the moment i just bought a single coilpack off my mate and next time one goes will get some yellowjackets.

All six plugs looked like this, i have no idea if its running lean or not, anyone here know?

IuHyy.jpg

As for the smoke. Are you using oil? Do you run a catch can setup and is the factory PCV valve still plumbed into the rocker cover and turbo inlet? Is it smokey at idle or with a quick punch of the accelerator to 2k or so? Or is it only after load/boost and lift off? Also, do you run a boost gauge and do you know the boost its running? Have you pulled the kick panel off to see if the ECU has any stickers and things on it or other signs it has been tampered with...if so by who?

Yes, i am using oil haha. It got brand new fully synthetic Penrite 15-w40 the same time as spark plugs, so about 5 months ago. No i dont run a catch can or anything like that, and im not sure what the PCV is, is the the breather hose looking things on the top of the cam covers? What do they do/where are they supposed to run to? And it was only smokey after coming off boost. It goes up to 14psi and then drops to about 13-13.5psi

I have had a quick look at the ECU before but didnt open it up or anything like that, will get some pics up here for you :)

wholly!! 8500 rpm, talking about raping lol!! got cams????

Nope standard cams as far as i am aware haha, sounds nucking futs but im sure it cant be good for it haha

Yeh, RB20s are terrible! Here is a comparo from a few years ago ... The RB20 gives away 500cc, half a point of compression and variable timing on the inlet cam ... AND is an older engine. So on paper where you dont have to pay for things or get them registered it seems a no brainer. But in the real world where your folding stuff is what you are handing over, and you want to get the car registered with correct engine numbers etc

BassJunky R34: GCG Hi Flow, Poncams same tuner and dyno as me

Abo Bob R34: GCG Hi Flow, built engine, think he had Poncams as well. Different dyno, different tune

My setup: Std RB20, std plenum, a TD06-20G setup

Main reason for the difference is the R32s higher final drive ratio adn 17" wheel vs 18s of the R34...but all are 4th gear pulls. Even if you only compare BassJunky's result and mine as they are both from teh same dyno and tuner....you can readily see that when you open up the taps why the RB20 easily keeps pace with the RB25NEO with a Hi-Flow GCG turbo.

What difference does the 17" v 18" wheels make, just moves the power curve backwards on the dyno sheet? IE your doing less speed when making the same power, or does it add more/less power to your graph when it's not really there?

PS, sorry if this post is all over the place, just woke up from and big night haha

Yeah I was just thinking the cheap way buy a neo and drop it in using all the 20 gear but yeah. Some people are happy with there rb20s

dam straight i had mine built, had a rb26 crank put it to stroke it to 2294cc aka rb23, i dont putter around in it. and she cops a thrashing once or twice a week on the old pac. bigger pistons, blueprinted, yes its a redtop. but for all of that comes a price when it goes bang it will go in a big way to make way for the rb31det

Okay, i got the turbo off, can anyone confirm that it is from a R34 GT-T? Im sure it is because of the OP6 rear housing, pics can be found Here!

56XG9h.jpg

After doing a bit more reading i can answer some of your questions, yes i am still running the stock PCV and lines. I was talking to one of my mates and he was saying that blowing the dip stick out is commonly cause by a blocked/stuffed PCV, and that i should check and clean the PCV. So i took it out and cleaned it with carby cleaner. Do i have to take the rocker cover breathers off and clean them as well? If so ho do you take them off, do they unscrew from the rocker cover? My PCV is still set up like factory ie;

PCV into intake manifold --> drivers rocker cover --> link to passenger rocker cover --> turbo intake after afm

Hopefully cleaning the PCV and lines will sort the issue, car is going in for a leakdown test on thursday anyway, gives me an idea of how healthy the engine is (:

Op6 = r34 gtt neo turbo

Or old 300zx turbo

Ah so OP6 does not strictly mean its from a 34 GT-T? I have a feeling that this would have come off a GT-T thought because it has practically zero shaft play vertically/horizontally and about 1mm at the most forwards/backwards.

Feel free to jump in guys as I may be wrong but the oil in your intake pipe could be fixed by running a catch can?

Yeah thats what my understanding is, but what is causing it is more my issue haha.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...