Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i think im driving round 2 much lol...even getting pics taken of me lol

danieltangtc: ah yes i rem, u turned near the bp? i live just few more streets up...

nozila: lol

DC GTST: sorry dude id have wound down the window but wasnt sure if it was u, cos had some other wierdo in a 32 stare me out when i nodded at him b4 lol...u drive that way much? im always heading home from work at that time...catch up :laugh:

last nite on my little outing on hindley, followed a 33 and a s14 down anzac, and this s14 looked stock as, no exhaust or fmic and it killed me!!! ;) time 4 a power fc! (i couldnt change gears good enough cos of my plaster lol)

last nite on my little outing on hindley, followed a 33 and a s14 down anzac, and this s14 looked stock as, no exhaust or fmic and it killed me!!! ;) time 4 a power fc! (i couldnt change gears good enough cos of my plaster lol)

from memory was the S14 a red colour hes running a T28 roler bearing steel wheel turbo @ 16psi i had a drag with him but i took him for 1st and 2nd and then he took me :laugh: story of my life too much weight in the GTS-4

No.. Not too much weight not enough power. ;)

Nice little gcg highflow or hks3037 similiar should sort the weight issue out. :D

wot 1680kg isnt too much

other optons sound expensive .. i tend to spend money on my pc rather than car :D least having a fast PC wont make me loose my license :laugh:

lol..

No doubt u overclock the sucker? Bit like winding up the boost really. :P

lol naw dont really need to yet :D

x1900xtx runs pretty fast in a P4 3.4 i have OC a little but i prefer to just run it stock as with over boosting u can run into trouble with hardware too

Ahh... you see thats your problem.

You have bought a little P4 (4cylinder) that is required to rev to 3400mhz in order to have similiar performance of an AMD (V8) @ 2200mhz. :P

lol

Not really related to overclocking... lol

On that note I'm soon in need of an upgrade. I'll be heading the P4 route this time. This little AMD 2100+ @ 3200+ has lasted 4years.

Ahh... you see thats your problem.

You have bought a little P4 (4cylinder) that is required to rev to 3400mhz in order to have similiar performance of an AMD (V8) @ 2200mhz. :P

lol

Not really related to overclocking... lol

On that note I'm soon in need of an upgrade. I'll be heading the P4 route this time. This little AMD 2100+ @ 3200+ has lasted 4years.

lol thats a good analagy anyways my next computer is going to be AMD not sure wot core though

im looking @ this mobo though

DFI lanparty

Be sure to researc the board plenty as amd boards ALWAYS seem to have annoying issues due to chipset. Probably the same with intel, just I haven't experienced it yet. :P

I went an ABIT, and would most definitely go one again.

One reason I am going an intel chipset board with a P4 next time around.

I'm considering a P4 dual core, I'm hoping I can hang out until they get the mem controller on chip. :D

sorry can't agree with you there Joel - this is my 4th AMD and they all have run perfect. Have had it 2 years and is an XP2500+ running at 2.2Ghz (ie. like a 3000+) no probs whatsoever. You HAVE TO HAVE decent cooling though.

ahh they do indeed have their little idiosyncries.

i.e returning out of standby issues, dead bios issues etc.. Otherwise.. Rock solid.

Not processor related, more so chipset and motherboard manufacturer related.

They aren't that bad but what I was getting at is 'some' of the amd boards are indeed quite bad. I can't say I like MSI, I forget the model, it was a little quirky with ram and didn't like to overclock. I'm sure there's similiar examples within the intel range.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...