Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1992 R32 GTS-T Type M - Manual

-Bosch 040 with relay

-300x600 front mount

-Pod filter with cold air box

-Superspark coil packs

-3 inch dump back exhaust

-Turbotech boost controller

143.5 rwkW @ ~11psi (Several months ago)

Recently embarked on a further set of upgrades

-Bosch Z32 AFM

-Denso 550cc injectors (bought second hand, cleaned and tested by KPM)

-Nistune computer

-Garrett GT2871R in RB25 housings

-3 inch Advance dump pipe

-Gutted cat

-New spark plugs (NGK platinum 7s)

Tuned on Thursday - 170 rwkW @ 16psi

Ran out of time at the dyno due to wasting most of the day with faulty computers and AFMs and I'm due back first thing on Tuesday (only got half an hour on the dyno by the time we got a working computer).

Very anxious as I was led to believe this setup should put out ~200 rwkW at ~16 psi and would be capable of 220kW plus at safe boost levels.

Dyno technician mentioned the carbon blowing out of the exhaust could indicate injectors not atomising correctly - how could this be? how much would this effect peak power?.

Current tune is quite laggy and rich, runs like a bitch when cold and stalls easily - still feels better than 143.5 and spins up much easier.

Is this purely a result of lack of dyno time and therefore rectified on Tuesday?

Any comments on this performance?

Cheers

Luke

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/397278-r32-turbo-upgrade-not-performing/
Share on other sites

I'm waiting to borrow a mates compression tester at the moment.

What's bothering me is I was already making 145 with the stock turbo and could've made 170 on stock turbo, injectors and AFM if i was willing to run a bit more boost...

I had a shit copy which was giving funny voltage signals so borrowed the tuners car to go pick up a genuine one, intend to get my money back on the crap one.

The tuner intends to keep working on it but 170 kW at 16 pound isn't very comforting.

Not at all mate

Stock cars with just a nistune pull figures close to 200kw

Something must be causing a restriction somewhere.

Is the rest of the exhaust 3 inch?

Also is the power figure limited by knock, is this why he doesn't want to push it further or it just won't pull further?

Not at all mate

Stock cars with just a nistune pull figures close to 200kw

Something must be causing a restriction somewhere.

Is the rest of the exhaust 3 inch?

Also is the power figure limited by knock, is this why he doesn't want to push it further or it just won't pull further?

Kasko a rb20 wont make 200kw with just a nistune

Exhaust is 3 inch all the way, empty cat, muffler with twin tips,overall power figure was limited by time mainly, a mate who went to the same tuner had a similar setup wound out to 237 kW @ ~20 psi, just can't see why I should be making 170 kW @ 16 psi, is this just a lack of tuning or an inherent problem with my setup (i.e. will they be able to make up ~30 kW at the same boost just through tuning).

Edited by Luke HCR32

I had a shit copy which was giving funny voltage signals so borrowed the tuners car to go pick up a genuine one, intend to get my money back on the crap one.

The tuner intends to keep working on it but 170 kW at 16 pound isn't very comforting.

Are u 100% sure the afm was a fake? Does it have the nissan logo on it?

Yeah it was sold as a non genuine AFM which was apparently "as good as genuine" no stickers or anything, dodgy looking filament, mesh only on one end of the tube, tuner said they've dealt with them before and they're rubbish.

The one I have now is a Bosch and has the orange Z32 JECS sticker on it, not sure about a Nissan logo but has the same build quality as my stock R32 AFM.

Yeah just go through the usual shit.

Check the timing, ensure the belt isn't off a tooth or similar. Comp test and so on.

You've already said it stalls so likely VAC leaks somewhere as well which won't be helping matters.

Could be many things really, just have to work at it slowly. Hardly anything to worry about yet.

Find the issue and you'll be sorted. Wind in 20psi and you'll see 200-220rwkw. In fact if you did that now, and tuned it. You'd be around 200-210rwkw which realistically isn't "that" far off the mark. Hard call when you aren't using genuine housings.

Stop worrying and let the tuner finish his work.

I had a ~40 RWKW difference between a finished "Tune", and then a check/small touch up tune. Bare in mind, this was on an RB30DET but still goes to show what some extra time/work can do.

The problem with my original tune was:

a) not enough timing overall

b) not enough fuel coming on full boost to stop detonation when running extra timing

c) some rough patches in the tune which made the car a little less drive-able.

Funnily enough it made more power everywhere once the above was fixed up.

Those 2871R's arnt that brilliant, especially in rb25housings, well on the rb25 anyway

i had one and it was not easy to tune , i had the stock actuator on there and the tuner had problems getting it to hold boost at the top end, that was the 56trim version

i made 214kw on a rb25 with power fc and usual mods using an avcr to hold 18psi, 170psi in each cylinder compression

200kw must be an awesome result for a rb20 with this turbo.

To be honest your 143rwkw@11psi is on the low side. The stock turbo's don't do anything special power wise past 12psi anyway so i'd say you were already 20rwkw down. Cant say if it's the dyno or the car.

From what you've said the car is currently running like a bag of crap, which i'd expect with half an hour to play with. It shouldn't have much done beyond a bit of light load tuning and maybe a run up to check that it's safe. Plenty more in it.

Also, re the 200@16 comment. Unless someone has had it on an RB20 i'd be doubtful. On an sr20 yeah, on an rb25 yeah, maybe less boost, on an rb20 no, they just seem to need a bit more boost to make the same numbers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
×
×
  • Create New...