Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Are people really trying to compare 550-580rwhp setups to a 730rwhp setup? That above plot looks damn encouraging with 300rwkws at 5,250rpm and hammer time all the way to 8,500rpm.

And mega fun....

Thanks guys.

Since I do have 5 gears it makes it around the road ok and fun to drive. I will make a few 110 oct pulls but I'm more about street power than were is the race fuel at. :no:

The race fuel result will be interesting.

No E85?

Would be interesting to see a dyno graph using 98 octaine, and E85 or C16 would be impressive.

Curious tho... I wonder how the the graph would compare using a more quality turbo like a HKS T51R SPL or Garrett GT42... Both 1000hp turbos

Tho the HKS T51r apparently spool faster than the Garrett equivalent range, HKS do use Garrett internals and have the most bad ass sounding noise but are a little out dated and cost mega $$$

Thats a twin scroll manifold, is this Precision turbo twin scroll? It doesn't say anywhere on the Precision site that it is...

So surely you would want a Twin scroll turbo for quicker spool time and to match your Full Race manifold, which looks like the Garrett GT45r would be a good match

Edited by HYBR3D

Would be interesting to see a dyno graph using 98 octaine, and E85 or C16 would be impressive.

Curious tho... I wonder how the the graph would compare using a more quality turbo like a HKS T51R SPL or Garrett GT42... Both 1000hp turbos

Tho the HKS T51r apparently spool faster than the Garrett equivalent range, HKS do use Garrett internals and have the most bad ass sounding noise but are a little out dated and cost mega $$$

Thats a twin scroll manifold, is this Precision turbo twin scroll? It doesn't say anywhere on the Precision site that it is...

So surely you would want a Twin scroll turbo for quicker spool time and to match your Full Race manifold, which looks like the Garrett GT45r would be a good match

Yes it's a twin scroll you can get both from Precision.

He's in canada, their 93 octane is our 98 octane.

I'm in the center of the USA.

guys its a Dynojet dyno, you can pretty much take 100hp off that figure comparing to the real dynos, think of it as a engine hp figure not whp.

Here in the states if you don't have a DynoJet you don't have a dyno. Not sure what you have.

Here in the states if you don't have a DynoJet you don't have a dyno. Not sure what you have.

dynojet dynos are junk, its well known the power figures are inflated. they read engine hp not whp.

"you don't have a dyno" lol we make some of the best dyno's in the world my friend. The best american dyno is a Mustang Dyno.

dynojet dynos are junk, its well known the power figures are inflated. they read engine hp not whp.

"you don't have a dyno" lol we make some of the best dyno's in the world my friend. The best american dyno is a Mustang Dyno.

What a ridiculous post, dude. For what its worth, from things I've observed so far in comparisons etc I find the Dynojets one of the most consistant and trust worthy dynos. Yes they read higher than DD (in saying that, there are heaps of people using DD dynos set up to read engine power - the results are coming out quite a bit higher than Dynojet read), but anyone with half a brain can take that into consideration - or just compare the results with other cars on the same kind of dyno,

What a ridiculous post, dude. For what its worth, from things I've observed so far in comparisons etc I find the Dynojets one of the most consistant and trust worthy dynos. Yes they read higher than DD (in saying that, there are heaps of people using DD dynos set up to read engine power - the results are coming out quite a bit higher than Dynojet read), but anyone with half a brain can take that into consideration - or just compare the results with other cars on the same kind of dyno,

thats his original point, the title is RWHP, Guilt-toy is pointing out that it will more likely than not, be reading closer to engine HP.

therefore, not being able to compare to other dynos that are setup up to read WHP.

So no one that posted has half a brain?

Edited by jangles

It was measured @ wheels, its rwhp. The fact that its closer to the engine hp than what a DD would give a reading for makes no difference, further from engine hp doesn't make it more accurate at all - just means its different and I think the collective are pretty offensive to continually slam anyone that runs a different dyno type to the minority here.... especially to the point of calling it junk. I personally feel that compared to MOST dyno brands the DD is the problem child, it reads far enough out from the "average" that it skews the whole ballgame, especially when DD fanbois act like all the others are "wrong" when thats BS.

For what its worth I've seen the odd comparison made between Dynojets and engine dynos and have seen results of 10-20% discrepancy between the number made on the engine dyno versus the DJ chassis dyno. The Dynojet software does NOT inflate anything (well it probably will do a little for SAE/whatever correction, as will DD/Dynapack/another other decent dyno software).

I know damn well Guilt Toy has more than half a brain, which is a good part of the reason I was so incredulous at what he said - this place is about sharing info and I feel that it was quite a "brain disengaged" type of comment to make, this place should be about sharing knowledge, experience and such forth. This guy has what could prove to be very useful "stuff" to share with us, and whether you guys like it or not he is using a dyno which is very likely to be far more proven and respected internationally ((certainly in the US) than DD and thus has really no reason to be treated as though he is an ignoramus for doing so. That kind of culture is what trains people who actually have experience worth sharing and would otherwise be inclined to into shutting up, and letting the empty cans prattle on and propegate misinformation further than it already has - and it clearly frustrates me.

On the other hand, the very thread title is claiming a particular HP, which means that dyno accuracy would make a difference. Not that i disagree with the fact that it really doesn't matter what actual number they put out, aslong as they do so consistantly (i guess you could say i disagree with brandishing a numbe about). Afterall dynos are for tuning cars. What has been done to it, and how it drives, are what is important

Accuracy is not an issue in this case anyway, DJ are really really consistant. How generous (or not) the dyno is the only point worth baring in mind here imho. In anyone's language this car is making a LOT of power, I'd be picking this car would still be making over 500rwkw on a DD dyno. I'm a bit iffy about the spool in this case, though - I'd have hoped to see better on a 2.8.

This thread has turned pointless, considering that here in Australia I can get one dyno reading at shop a then one at shop b and they will be very different, the only true comparison is using the same dyno in the exact same conditions.

If the op had supplied a before and after you probably wouldn't care as much about the end result , more the difference the mods made. I still think that is a nice power figure.

Edited by lilcrash

We just had a factory 2012 Camaro on a few weeks ago made the power GM said it should make 1 hp off.

As for the we part what dynos do you make?? You work for the company or what?

I wouldn'thave a Mustang dyno to many people saying they're wrong in the states nobody likes to hear Mustang numbers high low whatever. I just tune with it sorry if it's not the one you like. :no:

dynojet dynos are junk, its well known the power figures are inflated. they read engine hp not whp.

"you don't have a dyno" lol we make some of the best dyno's in the world my friend. The best american dyno is a Mustang Dyno.

Edited by Weapon X

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • just an update to this, poor man pays twice  Tried sanding down the pulleys but it didnt do the trick. Chucked another second hand alternator in the na car which I got for free off my mate and its fixed the squelling. Must have been unlucky with the bearings.    As for my turbo car, I managed to pick up a cwc rb alternator conversion bracket + LS alternator for 250 off marketplace, looked to be in really good nick. Installed it , started the car and its not charging the battery.... ( Im not good with auto elec stuff so im not sure if this was all I needed to do but I verified such by using a multimeter on the battery when the engine was running and I was only getting 12.2v )   I had to modify the earth strap for the new LS alternator , factory earth strap was a 10mm bolt which did not fit the bolt on the LS alternator which was double the size so I cut it off , went to repco bought some ring terminals that fit, crimped it onto the old earth strap and bolted it up to the alternator , started the car and same issue. Ran like shit and was reading 12.2 at the battery.  For a "plug and play" advertised kit thats not very plug and play but alas.  My question is , am I missing something ? Ive been reading that some people recommend upgrading the stock 80 amp alternator fuse to a 140 amp but I dont see how that would stop the alternator charging especially at idle not under load.  Regardless ive pulled it out and am going to get it bench tested by an auto elec tomorrow but it would be handy to know if ive missed something silly or have done something wrong.   
    • My wild guess is that you have popped off an intake pipe....check all of the hoses between the turbo and the throttle for splits or loose clamps.
    • Awesome, thanks for sharing!
    • To provide more specific help, more information is needed. What Android screen? What is its wiring diagram? Does the car's wiring have power at any required BAT and ACC wires, and is the loom's earth good?
    • So, now all you need to do is connect the 2 or 3x 12v feeds into the unit to permanent 12v, ACC 12V and IGN 12V that you can find in the spot behind the stereo, and the earth, and then it will switch on with the car.
×
×
  • Create New...